https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-Io25ZetIY

Bob Mitchell of the Last Days Watchman Channel has had his books removed from Amazon for sale. Consequently, he is concerned that he does not have sufficient funds to live on apart from his pension. A pension should be more than enough for anyone to live on, coupled with any savings they should have accumulated by now after a lifetime of lies and deception.

Amazon is simply telling Mitchell his books are an outdated load of misinformation. It is doubtful he will ever get your books back for sale at any publisher again anywhere, and so all he has been on about for so long has been nothing more than a complete waste of time. Mitchell has failed in almost every endeavor ever attempted. Accordingly, the outcome he now faces is a fitting punishment. He is now asking for money via his PayPal account. There will be no money forthcoming from me for anything.

It seems that many have reached a point of exhaustion and frustration with Bob Mitchell’s content. There is a general sentiment that some of his work has not met expectations for accuracy, and Amazon's decision to remove his books is seen by some as an important moment of accountability.

To provide a bit of objective context on the situation:

The Reality of Self-Publishing Platforms

• Content Policies: Amazon (KDP) has become increasingly strict regarding "Quality Standards" and "Misleading Content." While they rarely cite "misinformation" in a political sense, they frequently remove books for poor formatting, recycled content, or claims that violate their specific health and metadata guidelines.

• Financial Shift: For many independent creators, losing a primary distribution hub like Amazon is a significant blow, as it's the largest marketplace in the world. Transitioning to private sites or smaller publishers rarely yields the same revenue.

Regarding the "Waste of Time"

It’s understandable that many feel disappointed when the "end goal" of a creator's message does not materialize. However, such frustration can serve as motivation to pivot toward content that feels more grounded, evidence-based, or personally fulfilling, rather than continuing in the same direction as Bob Mitchell.

Blessings 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Bz9QUNPkoI

The sensationalist headline from Bob Mitchell’s Last Days Watchman Channel reads: SPIELBERG'S NEW UFO MOVIE: CHANNELING THE DEMONIC REALM? But what is the truth behind such a broad statement? Is this more of Bob Mitchell's recurring pattern—copying or plagiarizing others' work to attract the naive to his channel, which is full of content of this kind, even after being warned severely by Google?

The sensational headline from Bob Mitchell’s Last Days Watchman channel is a classic example of theological alarmism—a specific lens that interprets sci-fi through the "Collins-Boeche" or "Final Events" theory.

The "truth" behind such a broad statement is that it’s not based on the actual plot of the movie, but on a specific worldview that views all non-human intelligence as "interdimensional deception."

1. The Real Movie: Disclosure Day (2026)

While Bob Mitchell’s channel hints at demons, the actual film—officially titled Disclosure Day—is a grounded sci-fi drama.

• Release Date: June 12, 2026.

• The Story: Written by David Koepp (Jurassic Park), the film centres on the global repercussions of the government's official admission that aliens exist.

• The Vibe: Early reactions and trailers suggest a return to "classic Spielberg" (think Close Encounters of the Third Kind), focusing on human emotion and societal panic rather than horror or "demonic" tropes.

2. Where the "Demonic" Claim Comes From

The "channelling the demonic" narrative isn't unique to Bob Mitchell; it stems from a group of UFO researchers (like Nick Redfern in his book Final Events) who suggest that some elements of the U.S. government believe UFOs are "Non-Human Entities" (NHEs) that are spiritual or demonic in nature rather than extraterrestrial.

The Last Days Watchman channel applies this theory to Spielberg for a few reasons:

• Influence: Spielberg is often accused by conspiracy theorists of being a "propaganda tool" for "soft disclosure"—essentially "priming" the public to accept aliens.

• Theology: In some eschatological (End Times) circles, any extraterrestrial life is categorised as "the Great Deception" mentioned in the Bible. By making a movie about "Disclosure," Spielberg is viewed by these commentators as perpetuating that deception.

3. Fact vs. Sensationalism

Theme	Spiritual warfare / Demonic portal	Global disclosure / Human connection
Intent	Malicious "brainwashing"	Blockbuster entertainment / Art
Content	Secret occult symbols	Emily Blunt as a meteorologist

The Bottom Line

The "truth" is that Bob Mitchell is providing a religious critique, not a movie review. He is interpreting the topic of UFOs as inherently demonic based on his theological framework. Spielberg, on the other hand, is making a summer blockbuster about the human experience of a world-changing event, which makes Bob Mitchell's headline seem less relevant to the film's actual content.

Blessings

I Thessalonians Chapters 14-16.

14 For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:

15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

16 Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-16.

In these verses, Paul is writing to the young church in Thessalonica (modern-day Greece) to encourage them. They were facing heavy persecution, and Paul wanted them to know they weren't alone.

Verse 14: The Pattern of Suffering

Paul points out that the Thessalonian Christians have become "followers" (imitators) of the early Judean churches.

• The Connection: Just as the first Christians in Jerusalem were persecuted by their peers, the Thessalonians were being mistreated by their own neighbors and countrymen.

• The Comfort: Paul is essentially saying, "What you are going through is a sign that you are on the right path. You are sharing the same struggle as the very first believers."

Verse 15: The History of Opposition

Paul pivots to a very blunt critique of the religious authorities in Judea who opposed the Gospel. He lists four specific "charges":

1. They killed the Lord Jesus.

2. They killed their own prophets (referring to Old Testament history).

3. They persecuted the Apostles (driving Paul and his team out of town).

4. They do not please God and are "contrary to all men." This last phrase suggests that by opposing the Gospel, they were acting against the best interests of the entire human race.

Verse 16: The "Full Cup" of Sin

This is the most intense part of the passage. Paul explains how they are being contrary to all men: by trying to stop the Apostles from preaching to the Gentiles (non-Jews).

• Preventing Salvation: Paul views the attempt to silence the Gospel as a spiritual crime because it blocks people from being saved.

• Filling up their sins: This uses a common biblical metaphor that sin "accumulates" like liquid in a cup. Once the cup is full, judgment follows.

• The Wrath to the Uttermost: Paul suggests that by reaching this "limit," divine judgment is no longer just a possibility—it has become inevitable.

Contextual Note

It is important to read this in its historical context. Paul (who was Jewish himself) wasn't attacking a race of people, but specifically the religious establishment of that day that was actively using violence to stop the spread of the message of Jesus. He was grieving the fact that his own people were hindering a message meant for the whole world.

Key Takeaway: 

For the Thessalonians, this was a "hang in there" speech. It served to validate their pain and remind them that those who oppose God’s work eventually face the consequences of their actions. The passage also discusses the opposition faced by early Christians, including actions taken against Jesus, which are presented in the context of historical events.  

However, it proves that Jews are historically and still are Antichrist right throughout history, just as they still are to this day. They have proven this by killing the Lord Jesus Christ and hanging him on a cross. That is why so many Jews and lovers of this Satanic religion attack organizations like the Roman Catholic Church because of their unbridled disdain for anything do with Judaism, often labeling Jews as “Christ Killers”. I am a fundamentalist Born Again Christian and neither a Jew nor a Roman Catholic.

While the historical context of Paul’s writings often centres on specific local conflicts and internal Jewish debates of the era, my conclusion touches on a very old and heavy historical label. This is the "deicide" charge, or the "Christ Killer" narrative.

To address the historical and statistical realities of these groups today, it is helpful to examine how these dynamics have evolved in the modern world.

Modern Demographics and Religious Landscape

Since I identify fundamentalist Born Again Christians, and based on my perspective on both Judaism and Roman Catholicism, here is a breakdown of where these groups stand globally today:

Christianity (Total)	~2.4 Billion	Global (Americas, Europe, Africa)
— Roman Catholic	~1.3 Billion	Latin America, Europe, Philippines
— Protestant/Evangelical	~800 Million - 1 Billion	USA, Sub-Saharan Africa, Brazil
Judaism	~15.2 - 15.7 Million	Israel (7.2M), USA (6.3M)

Historical and Statistical Context

Regarding my claims, it is worth noting a few historical and statistical points that provide a broader view of these relationships:

• The "Christ Killer" Label: This term was historically used by various groups throughout the Middle Ages. However, in the modern era, most major Christian denominations have officially moved away from this. Most notably, the Roman Catholic Church officially repudiated the "deicide" charge against the Jewish people in the 1965 document Nostra Aetate.

• Jewish Views on Jesus: Statistically, modern Judaism does not focus on Jesus as a central figure of opposition. For the vast majority of the 15 million Jews worldwide, Jesus is viewed as a historical figure or a Jewish teacher, but not as an "Antichrist" figure, even though the bible describes the Antichrist as a Jew. In modern Israel, for instance, public opinion surveys show that the primary concerns are national security and secular-religious balance rather than opposition to Christianity.

• Violence and Persecution: While I mentioned the religious establishment using violence in Paul’s day, historical data shows that in the centuries following, the power dynamic shifted. During the Crusades and the Inquisition, Jewish populations were often the ones facing systemic violence from state-sponsored religious institutions in Europe.

The Role of Fundamentalism

As a Born Again Christian, I belong to one of the fastest-growing segments of global Christianity. Fundamentalist and Evangelical groups now make up a significant portion of the nearly 1 billion Protestants worldwide. Interestingly, within this group, there is a wide spectrum of views: some hold views similar to mine, while others identify as "Christian Zionists" and are among the strongest political and financial supporters of the Jewish state of Israel, and these are the largest group who oppose peace in the Middle East. At the same time, they still condom the genocide taking place right now against unarmed and defensiveness Palestinian men, women and in particular innocent children. These are the Zionists, but not genuine Christians.

Blessings