https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U3nlfTHQfs

Scammers in the comments section of YouTube channels can be a concerning issue. While it is not limited to YouTube or specific channels, scammers often pretend to be the YouTuber or the channel creator in order to deceive viewers. They may use cleverly edited videos or misleading comments to trick people into falling for their scams.

Some common types of scams found in YouTube comments include:

1. Crypto Scams: Scammers may promote fraudulent cryptocurrency schemes, promising high returns or exclusive investment opportunities. They often ask viewers to send them money or personal information.

2. Adult Site Scams: These scams involve luring viewers to adult websites by posting explicit or enticing comments. The scammers may claim to offer free access or special deals, but their intention is to collect personal information or spread malware.

3. Giveaway Scams: Scammers may pose as the channel creator and announce fake giveaways in the comments section. They ask viewers to provide personal information or pay a fee to participate, but there is no actual prize or giveaway.

4. Other Scams: YouTube comments can also be a hotspot for various other scams, such as phishing attempts, fake product promotions, or pyramid schemes. Scammers are constantly finding new ways to exploit unsuspecting viewers.

It is important for YouTube creators and viewers to be vigilant and aware of these scams. YouTube has implemented measures to combat scammers, but it is challenging to completely eliminate them. If you come across suspicious comments or scams, it is recommended to report them to YouTube and avoid engaging with the scammers.

Remember to exercise caution and scepticism when interacting with comments on YouTube channels. Be wary of any requests for personal information, money, or suspicious links. It's always better to be safe than sorry.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1U3nlfTHQfs

The recent developments regarding the recognition of a Palestinian state by Norway, Ireland, and Spain, as well as the context of the Two-State Solution, are significant in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict with other European nations sure to follow.

Norway, Ireland and Spain said Wednesday they would recognize a Palestinian State, in a historic move that is far from symbolic in a move that further deepens Israel’s isolation more than seven months into its grinding war against Hamas in Gaza. More nations within the EU are sure to follow. Israel immediately denounced the decisions and recalled its ambassadors to the three countries.

Palestinian leaders welcomed the announcements as an affirmation of their decades-long quest for statehood in east Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip — territories Israel seized in the 1967 Mideast war and still controls.

While some 140 countries — more than two-thirds of the United Nations — recognize a Palestinian state, Wednesday’s cascade of announcements could build momentum at a time when even close allies of Israel have piled on criticism for its conduct in Gaza for the mass murder they are committing.

The Two-State Solution refers to the proposal for the creation of two separate states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and security. This solution aims to address the long-standing Israeli-Palestinian conflict by establishing an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. Here are some key points about the Two-State Solution:

Purpose of the Two-State Solution:

1. Peace and Stability: The primary goal of the Two-State Solution is to bring lasting peace and stability to the region by addressing the grievances of both Israelis and Palestinians.

2. Self-Determination: It seeks to fulfil the aspirations of both peoples for self-determination and sovereignty.

3. End of Occupation: The solution aims to end the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories and establish secure borders for both Israel and Palestine.

4. Security: It focuses on ensuring the security and safety of both Israelis and Palestinians by establishing mechanisms for cooperation and mutual recognition.

Misconceptions:

1. Not About Destroying Israel: The Two-State Solution is not about the destruction of Israel. On the contrary, it recognizes Israel's right to exist as a secure and recognized state.

2. Coexistence: The vision of two states living side by side is based on the principles of coexistence, mutual respect, and peaceful relations between the two peoples.

3. Peaceful Resolution: The goal is to achieve a peaceful resolution to the conflict through negotiations, dialogue, and compromise, rather than through violence or military means.

4. International Consensus: The Two-State Solution has been endorsed by the international community as the most viable path towards a just and lasting resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Importance of Peace in the Middle East:

1. Regional Stability: A resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is seen as crucial for overall stability in the Middle East region.

2. Addressing Root Causes: By addressing the root causes of the conflict and providing a framework for coexistence, the Two-State Solution can help reduce tensions and promote peaceful relations among neighbouring countries.

3. Humanitarian Considerations: The solution also takes into account the humanitarian needs of both Israelis and Palestinians, including issues such as refugees, access to resources, and human rights.

The Two-State Solution is a diplomatic framework aimed at achieving peace, security, and stability for both Israelis and Palestinians. It is about finding a just and equitable resolution to a complex conflict, rather than seeking the destruction of any party involved.

Regarding the authority of Saudi Arabia to arrest citizens of other nations for not complying with favoritism towards Israel online, (if any) you have expressed in this posting it is essential to note the following:

Saudi Arabia does not have formal diplomatic relations with Israel, and there is no official treaty between the two countries. However, in recent years, there have been reports of behind-the-scenes cooperation and warming relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel due to shared concerns about Iran's influence in the region.

• Saudi Arabia's laws: Saudi Arabia has strict laws governing online activities, including those related to expressing opinions or views that go against the government's policies. Criticizing the government, its allies, or their policies online can lead to legal consequences in Saudi Arabia.

• Extraterritorial reach: Some countries have laws that allow them to prosecute individuals for online activities conducted outside their borders if those activities are considered to violate their laws. However, the extent to which Saudi Arabia can enforce such laws on citizens of other countries is limited and would depend on various factors, including the legal frameworks in place.

• International implications: Arresting citizens of other nations for not complying with favoritism towards Israel online could have significant diplomatic implications and could be seen as a violation of international norms and principles of free speech.

In summary, while Saudi Arabia may have laws that restrict certain online activities and criticisms of its policies or those of its allies, the direct authority to arrest citizens of other nations for not complying with favoritism towards Israel online is subject to legal and diplomatic considerations that may limit its practical application.

It is clear that Israel’s war of horror in Gaza has now turned against both the United States and Israel and that Netanyahu has lost the plot. Some specific YouTube channels have not only lost touch with reality, but they are also deliberately distorting facts by falsely reporting the global pariahs that Israel has now become.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The situation between Israel and the Palestinian people is complex and sensitive. Here is a summary of some consequences of the conflict for Israel:

International Criticism: Israel has faced significant international criticism for its treatment of the Palestinian people, with many countries and organizations condemning its actions as human rights violations. Diplomatic Isolation: The conflict has led to Israel facing diplomatic isolation in some international forums and organizations, with some countries distancing themselves from Israel due to its actions in the Palestinian territories. Security Concerns: The ongoing conflict with the Palestinians has created security concerns for Israel, leading to the need for a strong military presence and security measures to protect its citizens from attacks and threats.Economic Impact: The conflict has had economic repercussions for Israel, with resources being diverted towards defense and security instead of other areas such as infrastructure and social welfare. Social Divisions: Within Israeli society, the conflict has also created social divisions between those who support a hard-line approach towards the Palestinians and those who advocate for a peaceful resolution to the conflict. Psychological Impact: The conflict has taken a toll on the mental health and well-being of both Israelis and Palestinians, with generations growing up in a state of conflict and hostility.

There are ongoing protests in Israel calling for the removal of the Netanyahu government. These protests are not specifically related to the issue of bringing home hostages. Thousands of people have gathered in front of the Knesset in Jerusalem to express their dissatisfaction with the government and demand Netanyahu's resignation. The protests are among the largest demonstrations in Israel since the war began. More protests are expected, and the Israeli assault on Rafah has drawn international condemnation. Additionally, students from right around the globe have begun hunger strikes in protest against Israel's war in Gaza. The worldwide protests reflect the global concern and opposition to the ongoing conflict.

One of the killers of Palestinians Former Israeli Defense Minister and Netanyahu rival Benny Gantz has stated that he will resign from Israel's war Cabinet on June 8  (the sixth month) unless a new plan for dealing with Gaza is developed. Gantz's ultimatum comes as a response to the ongoing conflict and challenges in the region, particularly about Gaza. This move could have significant implications for the political landscape in Israel and the handling of security matters in the region. However, that date still gives Netanyahu time to completely take over Gaza and kill thousands of innocent civilians. 

U.S Secretary of State Antony Blinken was repeatedly interrupted by protesters condemning the US policy towards ally Israel and its war on Gaza. Protests against Israeli action in Gaza have been notably large across the entire globe and in particular the Arab world. Since the war began on October 7, 2023, the number of casualties has exceeded a significant number. 

Separate from the ICC case against Israel, the South African case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) against Israel for genocide in Gaza was brought before the court on December 29, 2023. South Africa accused Israel of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip as part of the Israel-Hamas war. The case was centered around the application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip. The ICJ's ruling on the case is ongoing. It is important to note that the case raised significant legal and humanitarian concerns regarding the situation in Gaza.

In response to the genocide in Gaza, the International Criminal Court Prosecutor's Office has requested arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as for three Hamas leaders: Yahya Sinwar, Mohamed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh. The warrants are for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during and since the Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7th last year, which resulted in the deaths of about 1,140 Israelis. The charges against Netanyahu and Gallant include "causing extermination, causing starvation as a method of war, including the denial of humanitarian aid" as stated by the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor. In response, Blinken has run to the US Congress to apply sanctions on the ICC in a weak attempt to force the ICC to withdraw its charges. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is an independent body and its decisions are based on the rule of law. Sanctions and pressure tactics are not likely to influence its decisions. It's important to respect the legal process and allow the ICC to conduct its investigation and reach its conclusions which can only be the issue of the respective arrest warrants.

The war in Gaza has affected the Israeli government's international standing in trade and commerce as well as their economy. Israel's conduct in Gaza has resulted in damage to the country's reputation on the global stage. The pursuit of military actions in Gaza has led to historic damage to Israel's international standing. The Israeli government's actions in Gaza have caused a loss of global credibility. The war has led to increased humanitarian assistance to Gaza and EU sanctions against Hamas, which can impact trade relations. Economy. The war has had significant economic implications, not only for Israel but also for the global economy. In the fourth quarter, Israel's economy experienced a 19.4% drop, with a 26.9% decrease in private spending and an 18.3% fall in exports. The war has had a huge impact on both the Israeli and Palestinian economies. The Bank of Israel estimated the war's "gross effects" on Israel at 198 billion shekels ($53 billion). The mobilization of reservists, who represent about 8% of Israel's workforce, has also affected the economy. Overall, the war in Gaza has had negative consequences for Israel's international standing in trade and commerce, as well as its economy.

Blessings

 https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The war in Gaza has affected the Israeli government's international standing in trade and commerce as well as their economy. Here are some key points:

International Standing in Trade and Commerce:

• Israel's conduct in Gaza has resulted in damage to the country's reputation on the global stage.

• The pursuit of military actions in Gaza has led to a historic damage to Israel's international standing.

• The Israeli government's actions in Gaza have caused a loss of global credibility.

• The war has led to increased humanitarian assistance to Gaza and EU sanctions against Hamas, which can impact trade relations.

Economy:

• The war has had significant economic implications, not only for Israel but also for the global economy.

• In the fourth quarter, Israel's economy experienced a 19.4% drop, with a 26.9% decrease in private spending and an 18.3% fall in exports.

• The war has had a huge impact on both the Israeli and Palestinian economies.

• The Bank of Israel estimated the war's "gross effects" on Israel at 198 billion shekels ($53 billion).

• Mobilization of reservists, who represent about 8% of Israel's workforce, has also affected the economy.

Overall, the war in Gaza has had negative consequences for Israel's international standing in trade and commerce, as well as its economy.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1U-0XP5elg

The concept of the Rorschach test, is a psychological test in which subjects' perceptions of inkblots are recorded and then analyzed using psychological interpretation. Here are some key points related to your observation:

• The painting of King Charles you posted evokes varied interpretations and responses from those making comments, similar to how the Rorschach test works.

• Through analyzing what individuals see in the painting, it can offer insights into their perceptions, emotions, thoughts, and personal experiences.

• Just like with the Rorschach test, different people may see different things in the painting based on their unique perspectives and subconscious associations.

• This process can sometimes reveal aspects of a person's personality, emotions, or even potential mental health concerns, although it's important to note that interpreting art in this way is not a diagnostic tool.

It's fascinating how art can spark such diverse reactions and interpretations, providing a glimpse into the complexity of human perception and psychology. I noticed that you saw a crown while I saw both a demon and Satan, horns and all. Clearly that was what the painting interned to portray, symbolism, and you fell for it hook, line and sinker. You did get a lot of comments out of it though and so that should help with your subscriber base.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1U-0XP5elg

Johnathon Yeo’s portrait of the king is replete with all his vices. It is technically superficial and unfelt. There’s no insight into the king’s personality here, just a weird allegory about a monarch butterfly that Yeo says symbolizes his metamorphosis from prince to king. 

Nice flattery. So it’s no surprise King Charles was said to be pleased with his first official portrait since being crowned. As he courageously copes with cancer, who’d begrudge any pleasure this glowing red homage gives good old King Charles? But the pleasing effect of joy and uplift as Charles’s red military uniform melds with a pinkish psychedelic splurge that was bought at the price of any genuine artistic perceptiveness or purpose. 

Yeo’s art is formulaic, and this one follows the formula. He does a pedantic study of someone’s features then – daringly! – collides this staid depiction with a free burst of lurid abstract wallpaper. 

He did Cara Delevingne in a vague subaqua setting and Taron Egerton in purple and pink rain. This is an evasion of actual portraiture based on acute, and hard observation. Royalists want portraits that look at their idols too astutely. 

Only one great artist in recent times has been allowed near a royal head: Lucian Freud’s searching, cruelly honest portrait of Queen Elizabeth II will never be loved by sentimentalists because it dares to treat the regal personage as just another person. And to be fair, Yeo has seen Charles in the same way he sees everyone – blandly. 

I would say his portrayal of that kindly face adds nothing to what we see of Charles in photos and TV images, except that it is not fair to photographers and camera people who often capture awkward, complex moments in the royal interaction with reality. Even the deferential coverage of the accession gave us those less-than-jolly glimpses of Charles infuriated by a pen. 

It’s tempting to laugh at this painting, but if you care about art, it’s a little sad as well. Yeo seems to be saying that the painting is just a cheery bit of fakery and razzle-dazzle. Who cares about the truth when you can beautify? A serious portrait would look hard and long at Charles (or anyone), not combine facile pseudo-portraiture with the cheery serotonin of random colour. We all know the king is more complex than this. The king knows he is more complicated than this.

When the portrait was unveiled it should be noted that this was not what King Charles expected as he twinged slightly when he first saw it. It was commissioned before the coronation in consultation with Charles while he was still a Prince. So unless he specifically requested what we now see it is still just the interpretation only of the artist that now leaves everyone to gasp at its shock and aware effect which is likely what he intended rather than a conventional portrait. 

 It is a masterpiece of shallowness by an artist so ludicrously upbeat that he should be called Jonathan Yeo!

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The International Criminal Court Prosecutor's Office has requested arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his defence chief Yoav Gallant, as well as for three Hamas leaders: Yahya Sinwar, Mohamed Deif, and Ismail Haniyeh.

The warrants are for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during and since the Hamas attack on southern Israel on October 7th last year, which resulted in the deaths of about 1,140 Israelis.

The charges against Netanyahu and Gallant include "causing extermination, causing starvation as a method of war, including the denial of humanitarian aid" as stated by the International Criminal Court's chief prosecutor. 

The ICC is seeking an arrest warrant for Gallant in connection with the same allegations as Netanyahu, alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied Palestinian territories.

This development is significant and indicates that legal action is being taken against these individuals.

These arrest warrants are part of the ICC's efforts to address alleged crimes committed in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It is important to note that the ICC's jurisdiction and the issuance of arrest warrants can be subject to various legal and political considerations and may take months to implement.

In the meantime any of the accused (the accursed) can freely travel to wherever they like, until the arrest warrants are approved. After that, they can and will be arrested.

Israel’s bombardment and ground invasion of the Gaza Strip, which has continued for more than seven months since that attack, has killed more than 35,000 people, mostly women and children, with thousands more lost and feared dead under the rubble.

In his statement, Khan praised the panel of experts he had convened to review the evidence and provide legal analysis to support these arrest warrants. He said its members have “immense standing in international humanitarian law and international criminal law”.

In an article for the Financial Times, the panel of experts collectively wrote that this is not the first time an international prosecutor has convened such a panel to seek advice regarding conflict and that it is not unusual for a prosecutor to invite external experts to participate in an evidence review.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has 127 member nations, but Israel and the United States are not members. Once warrants are issued, the five individuals mentioned will be subject to arrest if they travel to any of the 127 member territories. They can also be brought to trial at The Hague at any time.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The number 7 holds significance in the Bible as it is often seen as complete and perfect. It is mentioned 524 times throughout the Bible, with various symbolic meanings attached to it. However, it's important to note that it  is speculative to interpret specific events, such as the October 7th attack by Hamas on Israel, as a sign of the end times based solely on the occurrence of the number 7 in the Bible.

While the occurrence of the number 7 in the Bible is indeed significant, I'm not attempting to conclude that what happened on October 7th aligns with established theological principles and the end times until I observe further developments in the Middle East. 

One of the killers of Palestinians Former Israeli Defense Minister and Netanyahu rival Benny Gantz has stated that he will resign from Israel's war Cabinet on June 8  (the sixth month) unless a new plan for dealing with Gaza is developed. Gantz's ultimatum comes as a response to the ongoing conflict and challenges in the region, particularly about Gaza.

This move could have significant implications for the political landscape in Israel and the handling of security matters in the region. However, that date still gives Netanyahu time to completely take over Gaza and kill thousands of innocent civilians. 

In the Bible, the number 8 is often associated with new beginnings, resurrection, and regeneration. Here are some symbolic meanings of the number 8 in the Bible:

New Beginnings: The number 8 is often seen as symbolizing a new start or a new era. In the Bible, the eighth day represents a new beginning beyond the natural order. For example, Jesus was resurrected on the first day of the week, which symbolizes a new beginning for humanity.

Resurrection: The number 8 is connected to the concept of resurrection because Jesus rose from the dead on the first day of the week, which is the eighth day counting from the Jewish Sabbath.

Regeneration: Just as the number 8 symbolizes new beginnings, it also represents regeneration or renewal. It signifies a transformation or a fresh start in one's spiritual journey.

Covenant: Circumcision, a sign of the covenant between God and Abraham, was to be performed on the eighth day after a male child's birth. This ritual symbolizes the covenant relationship between God and His people.

Completeness or Fulfillment: In some interpretations, the number 8 is seen as representing completeness or fulfillment. It can signify the completion of a cycle or the fulfillment of a promise or prophecy.

Overall, the number 8 in the Bible carries rich symbolic meanings related to new beginnings, resurrection, regeneration, covenant, and completeness.

I am still searching and waiting for the fulfillment of the prophecy in Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27. Gantz's actions could signal its confirmation by the Antichrist. In this process, forget about Third Temples and Red Cows.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

I was sorry to hear about the tragic news of the death of the Iranian president in a helicopter crash. It is indeed a sorrowful event. Such incidents are always deeply distressing and significantly impact a nation and its people. The loss of a leader can have far-reaching consequences both domestically and internationally. Our thoughts and prayers are with the people of Iran during this difficult time.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huMNtG1RL7Q

The term "god of forces" is mentioned in the Bible in the book of Daniel, specifically in Daniel 11:38 (King James Version). In this verse, it refers to a deity or power worshiped by a king who exalts himself above all gods. However, it does not specifically name this deity as "Apollyon."

"Apollyon" is a different term mentioned in the Bible, specifically in the book of Revelation. In Revelation 9:11 (King James Version), Apollyon is described as the king of the demonic locusts that emerge during the fifth trumpet judgment. Apollyon is often interpreted as a symbolic figure representing destruction or the angel of the bottomless pit. Therefore, "god of forces" and "Apollyon" are distinct terms found in different parts of the Bible with different contexts and meanings. 

Do not take the Bible out of context and add meanings or verses that are not there to begin with. To do so, you are summoning a curse upon yourself.

Blessings