https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX2cpl4L5os

The 10-nation confederacy in the Bible is a prophetic concept that refers to a future alliance of ten kingdoms or regions that will oppose Israel and God's people in the end times. The idea is based on several passages in the books of Daniel and Revelation, where a beast with ten horns or a statue with ten toes represents the final form of the Roman Empire, revived and influenced by a powerful leader known as the Antichrist. Some interpreters identify the ten nations with current or historical countries in Europe or the Middle East, while others see them as symbolic of all the enemies of God throughout history. According to the Bible, this confederation will wage war against Israel and the saints, but will be ultimately defeated by the return of Christ and his heavenly army.

It is important to note that the interpretation suggesting that the USA is behind a ten-nation confederacy, which fulfils the biblical prophecy of Daniel Chapter 7 and Revelation Chapter 13 Verse 1, is a simplistic and inaccurate view. This belief lacks historical and geographical evidence, contradicts other prophetic passages, and is inconsistent with the symbolic meaning of the beasts and horns. A careful and contextual study of the biblical texts reveals that the ten-nation confederacy, which some believe is related to the ancient Roman Empire and its future revival, is not related to the USA, but rather to the ASEAN union headed by China and backed by Russia. As per this view, Putin is considered the Antichrist. Therefore, it is important not to be misled by this erroneous view, but rather to seek to understand the prophecy in light of its original context and purpose.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX2cpl4L5os&t=640s

The proposed Middle East two state solution is a framework for resolving the conflict between Israel and Palestine by creating two independent states for the two peoples. The idea is based on the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine of 1947, which was not implemented, and the principle of land for peace, which emerged after the 1967 Six-Day War. The two state solution would establish a Palestinian state on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, with East Jerusalem as its capital, and recognize Israel's right to exist within secure borders. The exact boundaries and other issues, such as refugees, security, and water, are still subject to negotiation and dispute. The two state solution has been endorsed by the international community, including the United States, the European Union, the Arab League, and the Quartet on the Middle East. However, it faces many challenges and obstacles, such as Israeli settlements, Palestinian political division, violence, and extremism. Both sides have expressed support for a two state solution at different times, but also have doubts and reservations about its feasibility and desirability.

According to the Christian eschatological doctrine, Christ will return to Jerusalem in the future to establish his millennial kingdom on earth. This event, also known as the Second Coming or the Parousia, is based on various biblical prophecies and interpretations. Christians believe that Christ will come back in glory and power, accompanied by his angels and saints, to judge the living and the dead, and to fulfill God's plan of salvation. The exact timing and manner of Christ's return are unknown, but many Christians anticipate it with hope and joy, while others warn of the tribulations and persecutions that will precede it.

The focus of Israel is to annihilate the entire state of Gaza so they don't have to share Jerusalem with the proposed Middle East two-state solution and sign a peace covenant. The impediment to peace in the Middle East has always been Israel. There will be a two-state solution and Israel will have to share Jerusalem with Palestine. Accordingly, no matter what form of action Israel takes against Gaza it will not change what God has ordained.

There is a lot of diversity in the world, and people often have different perspectives and opinions on various topics. However, not all opinions are equally valid or supported by evidence. Some opinions are based on false assumptions, logical fallacies, biases, or prejudices. These opinions are not only wrong, but they can also be harmful to others or to society as a whole. Therefore, it is important to critically examine the sources and arguments of different opinions, and to challenge them when they are incorrect or unjustified.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX2cpl4L5os

What you have just engaged in here with this posting is a particularly malicious attack against the Palestinians by highly favouring Israel in their genocide of the Palestinians. You have not shown one ounce of empathy, favour or compassion to the citizens in Gaza being butchered daily. As a confessed Jew, you have presented a biased and incomplete account of the current situation in Gaza leaving out important facts and details that do not support your argument.

You have ignored the perspectives and experiences of other people who are affected by this issue, and you have cherry-picked the evidence that suits your agenda. You have failed to acknowledge the complexity and nuance of the problem, and you have oversimplified it to fit your narrative. You have shown only the side of the current situation that suits you, omitting the entire picture altogether. This is malevolent reporting to the extreme and this sort of gutter journalism should be condemned by the entire world. Do not identify yourself as a Christian to do so is an insult to the very nature of the Lord God.

Favouritism in reporting is a serious ethical issue that can undermine the credibility and trustworthiness of journalists and media outlets. Favouritism can occur when reporters show a preference or bias towards certain sources, topics, perspectives, or outcomes, either intentionally or unconsciously. Favouritism can also be influenced by external factors, such as political pressure, corporate interests, personal relationships, or social norms. Favouritism in reporting can have negative consequences for the public, such as misinforming, misleading, or manipulating the audience, creating or reinforcing stereotypes, polarizing or dividing the society, or eroding the democratic values and principles. Therefore, journalists and media organisations should strive to avoid favouritism in reporting and adhere to the professional standards and codes of ethics that promote fairness, accuracy, balance, diversity, and accountability.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AX2cpl4L5os 

The United State alone has been responsible for supplying weapons to Israel and if they were to stop doing so there would be peace and maybe Israel would stop killing babies and children.

The Guardian reported that the US has been giving military aid to Israel without checking the human rights record of the Israeli army. The US has sent more than 70,000 weapons, such as planes, tanks, rockets, and bombs, to Israel through military aid from 1950 to 2022. The US Defense Secretary, Lloyd Austin, said that the US will keep giving Israel the weapons and ammo it needs for its fight with Hamas in Gaza.

It is hard to say if peace would happen if the US stopped giving weapons to Israel. But it is important to mention that the US has been selling tank shells to Israel directly, without asking Congress, which some Democrats have condemned.

However there is no need to look further to see God's judgement on the United States for doing so than Revelation Chapter 18.

Revelation Chapter 18 is the eighteenth chapter of the Book of Revelation, which is the last book of the New Testament in the Christian Bible. It describes the fall of Babylon, the great city that symbolizes the world system of evil and oppression. The chapter begins with an angel announcing the doom of Babylon with a loud voice, saying that it has become a dwelling place of demons and a haunt of every unclean spirit. The angel calls God's people to come out of Babylon, so that they will not share in her sins and plagues. The chapter then describes the lamentations of the kings, merchants and sailors of the earth, who mourn over the destruction of Babylon, which was the source of their wealth and luxury. They stand at a distance, afraid of her torment, and say, "Woe, woe, the great city, Babylon, the strong city! For in one hour your judgment has come." The chapter ends with another angel throwing a great millstone into the sea, saying that Babylon will be thrown down with violence and will never be found again. The chapter also declares that the blood of prophets, saints and all who have been slain on the earth will be avenged on Babylon.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30-YWEGBZ5c

Trump may have a chance to challenge the decision of Colorado to exclude his name from the voting papers in the high court and get it reversed, but that does not necessarily imply that other states would have to follow the same precedent as Colorado and also take his name off the ballot papers.

He would face a long and arduous legal battle to regain his eligibility in each state, as they have different rules and procedures for ballot access. This process could drag on for the entire year of 2024, leaving him with little time and resources to challenge every state's decision. He would have to tailor his arguments to each state's specific circumstances, as there is no universal solution for his situation.

A more effective strategy for the Democratic Party would be to nominate a competent and appealing candidate who can challenge Trump in the electoral arena, rather than relying on legal battles to undermine his legitimacy. This approach would not only avoid the risk of further polarizing the public and the judiciary, but also demonstrate the party's confidence and vision for the future of the country.

Predicting the outcome of any election is a risky endeavor, especially in the United States where the electoral system is complex and unpredictable. I would not presume to declare that Trump is a sure winner, as there is still a possibility that the democrats could prevail despite his apparent advantage. I have learned from experience that the outcome of any election in the United States is not determined by polls, pundits or preferences, but by factors that are often beyond the control or knowledge of the general public.

If does not win there is no possibility that he is the Biblical Antichrist which will them make those who say he is now look very foolish indeed.

Those who are ready to risk everything and expose themselves to such a situation deserve our best wishes. It is not an easy decision to make, nor a simple task to accomplish. They are showing courage, determination and commitment in pursuing their goals, despite the challenges and uncertainties they may face. We hope that they will succeed and achieve their desired outcomes but nothing is ever set in concrete except for the word of God.

One of the most challenging aspects of biblical studies is the interpretation of future prophecies. The Bible contains many passages that describe events that have not yet occurred, such as the return of Christ, the resurrection of the dead, the judgment of the world, and the establishment of God's kingdom. These prophecies are often expressed in symbolic or figurative language, which requires careful analysis and comparison with other biblical texts and historical contexts. Moreover, different schools of thought have developed over the centuries, offering various frameworks and methods for understanding the meaning and timing of these prophecies. Some scholars adopt a literal approach, while others prefer a more allegorical or spiritualized one. Some emphasize the continuity between the Old and New Testaments, while others stress the discontinuity and contrast. Some focus on the fulfillment of prophecies in the past or present, while others look forward to their future realization. These diverse perspectives can lead to different and sometimes conflicting interpretations of the same prophecy, which can cause confusion and disagreement among Christians. Therefore, it is important to approach future prophecies with humility, respect, and openness, recognizing that no human interpretation is infallible or complete. It is also essential to seek guidance from the Holy Spirit, who inspired the biblical writers and who can illuminate our minds and hearts to discern God's will and purpose for his people and his creation.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

This is a very sensitive and tragic topic that deserves respect and compassion, not exploitation or manipulation. The situation in Gaza is alarming and unacceptable. The escalation of violence and the indiscriminate attacks on civilians have caused immense suffering and loss of life. The international community has a responsibility to protect the human rights and dignity of all people in the region, and to support the efforts to end the conflict and achieve a lasting peace. A ceasefire is urgently needed to stop the bloodshed, prevent further deterioration of the humanitarian crisis, and create the conditions for dialogue and negotiation. We call on all parties to respect international humanitarian law, refrain from any actions that could escalate the tension, and show maximum restraint. We urge them to agree to an immediate cessation of hostilities and to engage constructively with the mediation efforts of the United Nations and other regional and international actors. Only a political solution can address the root causes of the conflict and ensure the security and well-being of both Israelis and Palestinians.

Most of the world is now sick and tired of turning on our televisions at night and seeing the killing, torture and humiliation of Palestinians in Gaza. The worldwide global outrages and protests testify to that fact. They show that people are not willing to accept the status quo of injustice, oppression and inequality. They demand change, accountability and justice. They challenge the systems and structures that perpetuate violence, discrimination and exploitation. They seek a better world for themselves and future generations. They are not alone in their struggle. They are joined by allies, supporters and sympathisers from different backgrounds, cultures and countries. They are part of a global movement that transcends borders, boundaries and barriers. They are the voice of the voiceless, the hope of the hopeless, the power of the powerless.

The Palestinians are the victims. Israel is the perpetrators who are committing these unmentionable war crimes against unarmed citizens. Who can blame them for their intense resentment of anything to do with Israel after what has been done to them all in the name of vengeance for the October 07th resistance fighters' attacks on Israel that have now turned into the genocide of an entire nation?

The Palestinians are a people who have suffered a lot of injustice and oppression in their history. They have been displaced, occupied, and denied their basic rights and dignity. Despite all these hardships, they have not given up on their aspirations for freedom and self-determination. They have not succumbed to hatred or violence, but have resisted with courage and resilience. They have shown the world that they are not a threat, but a partner for peace and coexistence. They have a bone of compassion, not hatred, in their bodies. Instead, it is the Jews who are full of hatred and revenge who will have to pay the ultimate price for their depravity and violence at the battle of Armageddon.

The battle of Armageddon is a term used in some Christian traditions to refer to the final conflict between the forces of good and evil before the end of the world. According to some interpretations of the Book of Revelation, the battle will take place in a valley near the ancient city of Megiddo, also known as Armageddon. The outcome of the battle will be the defeat of the JEWISH Antichrist and his allies, and the triumph of Jesus Christ and his followers.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The Dome of the Rock is a historic and religious site in Jerusalem that was built by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik in the late 7th century CE. It is the oldest surviving Islamic monument and one of the most recognizable landmarks in the city. The shrine is located on the Temple Mount, a sacred place for Jews, Christians and Muslims. The Dome of the Rock covers a large rock that is believed to have various associations with the Abrahamic faiths, such as being the place where God created Adam, where Abraham was about to sacrifice his son, and where Muhammad ascended to heaven. The shrine has a distinctive octagonal shape and a golden dome that reflects the sunlight. The interior and exterior walls are decorated with marble, mosaics and metal plaques that feature Arabic inscriptions and geometric and floral patterns. The Dome of the Rock is a masterpiece of Islamic architecture and art that reflects the cultural and religious diversity of Jerusalem.

The third temple is a term that refers to a future temple that will be built in Jerusalem according to some interpretations of biblical prophecy. The first temple was built by King Solomon and destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BC. The second temple was rebuilt after the return from exile and later expanded by King Herod, but it was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD. The third temple is expected to be built before or during the tribulation period, when the Antichrist will defile it and proclaim himself to be God. The third temple is mentioned in several passages of the Bible, such as Daniel 9:27, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, and Revelation 11:1-2. Some Christians believe that the third temple is necessary for the fulfilment of end-time prophecies, while others believe that it is not required or that it symbolises the church or the body of Christ.

Some people have argued that the only way to rebuild the third temple in Jerusalem is to demolish the Dome of the Rock, a sacred Islamic shrine that stands on the Temple Mount. However, this view is based on a misunderstanding of the historical and religious significance of both structures, and it would only lead to more violence and conflict in the region. The Dome of the Rock is not only a beautiful architectural masterpiece, but also a symbol of the shared Abrahamic heritage of Judaism, Christianity and Islam. It was built in the 7th century CE by the Umayyad caliph Abd al-Malik, who wanted to honer the site where Muslims believe that the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven during his night journey. The dome covers a rock that is also revered by Jews as the Foundation Stone, where Abraham was prepared to sacrifice his son Isaac, and where the first and second temples were erected. The third temple, according to Jewish tradition, will be built by the Messiah when he comes to usher in an era of peace and justice. Therefore, destroying the Dome of the Rock would not only be an act of sacrilege against Islam, but also a violation of Jewish faith and prophecy. Rather than seeking to erase the past, we should respect and celebrate the diversity and richness of our cultures and religions, and work together for a peaceful and harmonious future.

Some people claim that the prophecy of a third temple in Jerusalem is a sign of the end times and the return of Christ. For that to take place the Dome of the Rock must be destroyed. However, there is nothing in the Holy Bible mentioning a third temple ever being built and so the Dome of the Rock will never be destroyed to make way for something that will never be built. The only references to a temple in the New Testament are either about the historical temple that was destroyed in 70 AD, or about the spiritual temple that is the body of Christ and his church. The idea of a third temple is based on a misinterpretation of some Old Testament passages, such as Ezekiel 40-48, that describe a visionary temple that symbolizes God's presence and glory among his people. There is no reason to expect a literal fulfillment of these visions, especially since they contradict other biblical teachings about the final state of God's kingdom. Therefore, Christians should not be distracted by speculations about a third temple, or the blowing up of the Dome of the Rock, but rather focus on living as faithful witnesses of the gospel in the present age.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

According to various sources, there has been a worrying increase in the number of hate crimes targeting Muslims in different parts of the world. These incidents range from verbal abuse and harassment to physical assault and vandalism of mosques and Islamic centers. The perpetrators of these crimes are often motivated by prejudice, ignorance, or fear of Islam and its followers. Some of the factors that may contribute to this rise in anti-Muslim sentiment include the spread of misinformation and propaganda, the influence of extremist groups, and the lack of interfaith dialogue and education. Hate crimes against Muslims not only violate their human rights and dignity, but also threaten the social cohesion and diversity of the communities they live in. Therefore, it is imperative that governments, civil society organizations, media outlets, and religious leaders work together to combat this phenomenon and promote a culture of respect, tolerance, and peace among all people.

Freedom of speech is not freedom to spread racial hatred on the Internet. Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that protects the expression of opinions and ideas without fear of censorship or retaliation. However, freedom of speech is not absolute and does not include the right to incite violence, discrimination or hatred against others based on their race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or any other protected characteristic. Racial hatred is a form of hate speech that targets people because of their skin colour or ethnic origin. It is harmful, divisive and illegal in many countries. Racial hatred on social media can have serious consequences for individuals and communities, such as psychological distress, physical harm, social isolation and radicalisation. Therefore, internet platforms have a responsibility to prevent and remove racial hatred from their sites, and users have a duty to respect the dignity and rights of others when they post or share content online. Freedom of speech is not a license to abuse, harass or threaten anyone. Freedom of speech is a privilege that comes with responsibility and accountability.

To effectively counter online hate rhetoric, it's crucial to take action by completely cutting off any support to such groups, including financial support. By doing so, we can send a clear message that their hateful online rants against any particular group won't be tolerated. Only then can we hope that they will eventually realize the error of their ways and stop spreading hateful messages online.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3U58R-KYxI&t=385s 

In a stunning decision, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump is ineligible to appear on the state's 2024 presidential ballot. The court found that Trump violated the state's constitutional provision that limits the number of terms a person can serve as president to two. The ruling, which is likely to be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, has significant implications for the 2024 election and the future of American democracy.

The court's majority opinion, written by Chief Justice Monica Márquez, argued that the Colorado term limits amendment, which was approved by voters in 1990, applies to any person who has served as president, regardless of whether they were elected or appointed, and regardless of whether they served full or partial terms. The court rejected Trump's argument that he should be allowed to run for a second term because he was impeached twice and acquitted by the Senate, which he claimed nullified his first term.

The court also rejected Trump's argument that the Colorado term limits amendment violates the U.S. Constitution, which sets the qualifications for presidential candidates and does not explicitly prohibit a third term. The court said that the U.S. Constitution allows states to impose additional qualifications for presidential electors, as long as they do not conflict with the federal requirements. The court cited previous cases where states have imposed restrictions on presidential electors, such as requiring them to pledge to vote for the winner of the state's popular vote.

The ruling is a major blow to Trump's political ambitions and his loyal supporters, who have been hoping for his comeback in 2024. Trump has not officially announced his candidacy, but he has repeatedly hinted at his intention to run again and has maintained a strong grip on the Republican Party. He has also continued to spread false claims that he won the 2020 election and that it was stolen from him by widespread fraud.

The ruling could also have a ripple effect on other states that have similar term limits provisions in their constitutions or statutes. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 23 states have some form of presidential term limits, though some of them only apply to state-funded primary elections or are not enforced. If other states follow Colorado's example and bar Trump from their ballots, it could severely limit his chances of winning enough electoral votes to secure the presidency.

The ruling is likely to face legal challenges from Trump and his allies, who will argue that it violates his constitutional rights and disenfranchises millions of voters who support him. They will also contend that Colorado's term limits amendment is inconsistent with the 22nd Amendment, which was ratified in 1951 and limits the president to two terms. The 22nd Amendment was passed in response to President Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four-term presidency, which ended with his death in 1945.

The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of state-imposed presidential term limits, and it is unclear how it would decide such a case. The court currently has a 6-3 conservative majority, which includes three justices appointed by Trump. However, the court has also shown some independence from Trump in recent cases, such as rejecting his attempts to overturn the 2020 election results and upholding the Affordable Care Act.

The Colorado ruling is a reminder that the 2024 election is already shaping up to be a contentious and unpredictable one, with many legal and political uncertainties ahead. It also raises important questions about the balance of power between the states and the federal government, and the role of the courts in resolving electoral disputes. As the nation prepares for another presidential race, it will have to grapple with the consequences of this historic decision and its impact on the future of American democracy.

The Beast that was and is but now is now looks as if he will never be able to run for the presidency again. This is the conclusion of many political analysts who have observed his decline in popularity and influence over the past few years. Once a formidable force in the political arena, he has now become a marginalized figure who faces legal troubles, internal divisions and public backlash. His loyal supporters are dwindling and his enemies are growing. His attempts to regain power have been met with resistance and ridicule. He has lost his charisma, his credibility and his control. He is no longer the Beast that he once was, but a shadow of his former self.

A You Tube channel going down the gurgler such as this is a sad sight to see. It can happen for many reasons, such as losing subscribers, getting demonetised, facing legal issues, or simply losing relevance. Sometimes, the creators try to revive their channel by changing their content, collaborating with other You Tubers, or engaging more with their fans. But other times, they just give up and move on to other projects. 

You have had it coming for a long time, but I do not feel sorry to see your imminent demise.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ZEOpqzef9U

This advertisement was published at this time last year. It seems like a profitable time for those looking to spread the word of God.

One of the most thoughtful gifts you can give to your loved ones is a book that reveals the truth about the end times. There is only one book that has the authority and accuracy to do that, and it is the Holy Bible. Among the many versions of the Bible, I recommend the King James Version, because it preserves the original meaning and beauty of the inspired words of God.

When giving books as gifts, it's important to consider their sources, especially those with conspiracy theories or prophecies.

Blessings