https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=1s

Monster

 

Monsters among men is a phrase that refers to the worst examples of human cruelty and evil. It is often used to describe people who commit atrocities, such as genocide, torture, rape, murder, or terrorism. Some examples of monsters among men are Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Osama bin Laden, Ted Bundy and now Benjamin Netanyahu. These people have caused immense suffering and death to millions of innocent victims, and have shown no remorse or empathy for their actions. They are considered to be beyond redemption and unworthy of any sympathy or respect.

Monsters among men are not born but made. They are the product of various factors, such as psychological disorders, traumatic experiences, ideological indoctrination, social influences, or personal ambitions. They may also have some genetic or biological predispositions that make them more prone to violence or aggression. However, these factors do not justify or excuse their behaviour, as they still can choose between right and wrong. They are ultimately responsible for their actions and the consequences they bring.

Monsters among men pose a serious threat to the security and well-being of humanity. They often have followers or supporters who share their twisted views or benefit from their crimes. They may also have access to weapons of mass destruction or other means of causing harm on a large scale. They must be stopped by any means necessary before they inflict more damage or inspire others to follow their example. They must be brought to justice and held accountable for their crimes, either by legal systems or by moral forces. They must be exposed and condemned by public opinion and the media, and their legacy must be erased from history. The Jews who occupy Israel are a prime example of this kind of scenario, monsters they are.

I am not referring here to the average run-of-the-mill Jew but to the unholy trinity of the Israeli war cabinet. The Israeli war cabinet was established on October 11, 2023, which was five days after the start of the 2023 Israel-Hamas war. The war cabinet is comprised of Benjamin Netanyahu as the prime minister, Yoav Gallant as the defence minister, and Benny Gantz, former Chief of the General Staff. There are two observers, namely Gadi Eizenkot and Ron Dermer. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinian militant groups, led by Hamas, is known as the 2023 Israel-Hamas war.

At this stage, there does not appear to be any way of stopping these brutes from their ongoing cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people as they wage an all-out -apartheid war of attrition against every living person in Gaza.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY11mVLeqsg

You have stated the birth mother of Christ was Jewish which would determine Christ as Jewish according to the custom of the mother of a Jew having to be Jewish. `

According to your statement, the biological mother of Jesus was a Jewish woman, which implies that Jesus was also Jewish by the tradition that the mother's identity determines the child's Jewish status. This is a common argument used by some Christian groups to claim a connection between Christianity and Judaism, but it is not universally accepted by all Jewish or Christian authorities. There are many factors that influence the religious identity of a person, such as their beliefs, practices, community, and historical context. Therefore, it is not accurate or respectful to simply assume that Jesus was Jewish based on his maternal lineage alone. The Bible does not give a direct answer to this question, but it provides some clues that can help us infer her ethnic and religious identity.

First, we need to understand that the term "Jewish" can have different meanings depending on the context. It can refer to a person's ancestry, culture, religion, or nationality. In the time of Jesus, there were different groups of Jews who had different beliefs and practices, such as the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, and the Zealots.

Second, we need to examine the biblical evidence that relates to Mary's background. The most obvious clue is that she was a descendant of King David, as shown in the genealogies of Matthew 1 and Luke 3. This means that she belonged to the tribe of Judah, one of the twelve tribes of Israel. She was also a relative of Elizabeth, who was a descendant of Aaron, the first high priest of Israel (Luke 1:5, 36). This implies that she had a priestly lineage as well.

Third, we need to consider the cultural and religious environment that Mary lived in. She was born and raised in Nazareth, a small town in Galilee, which was a region that had a mixed population of Jews and Gentiles. However, she was betrothed to Joseph, who was also a descendant of David and a devout follower of the law of Moses (Matthew 1:19-20). She also visited the temple in Jerusalem with Joseph and Jesus when he was twelve years old (Luke 2:41-52). She also participated in the Jewish festivals and rituals, such as the Passover (John 2:13), the Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:2), and the purification rites after childbirth (Luke 2:22-24). She also expressed her faith in God and his promises to Israel in her song of praise, known as the Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55).

Based on these clues, we can conclude that Mary was Jewish in terms of her ancestry, culture, and religion. She was part of God's chosen people who were waiting for the Messiah to come and fulfill his covenant with them. She was also privileged to be the mother of Jesus, who was not only the Son of David, but also the Son of God and the Savior of the world.

A possible objection to this view is that it relies on a situational analysis rather than a direct reading of the biblical text. The argument assumes that the context and the circumstances of the original audience are more important than the literal meaning of the words. This may lead to a distortion or a misapplication of the scriptural message, especially if the situation changes over time. A more faithful approach would be to examine what the bible actually says, without imposing any external or subjective factors on the interpretation. The Bible does not state Christ's Jewish identity, which is determined by the mother's Jewishness.

According to the Gospel of Matthew, Joseph, Mary, and Jesus fled to Egypt to avoid Herod's order to kill all children under two years old. After some time, an angel told Joseph in a dream not to go back to Judea because the new ruler, Archelaus, was Herod's son. Instead, they traveled north to Nazareth in Galilee, where Jesus grew up. Matthew says that this was to fulfill what prophets had foretold, that "He shall be called a Nazarene". However, this hypothesis is not universally accepted, especially by Messianic Jews. The term Nazarene is derived from the name of the city of Nazareth, where Jesus was raised. It is possible that the term Nazarene also refers to those who strongly adhered to, and defended the Mosaic Law but does not mean Christ adhered to these laws. It is important to note that these are based on religious beliefs and interpretations that may not be shared by everyone. Lastly, it is important to clarify that Christ was not a Jew and neither does the Bible identify Christ as a Jew.

The Mosaic Law is a set of religious and moral codes that God revealed to Moses on Mount Sinai, according to the Hebrew Bible. The Mosaic Law consists of the Torah, or the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, which contain various laws and commandments for the Israelite's to follow. The Mosaic Law can be divided into three categories: moral, ceremonial, and civil. The moral laws include the Ten Commandments, which are universal principles of righteousness and justice. The ceremonial laws include the regulations for worship, sacrifices, festivals, and rituals. Civil laws include the rules for social and political life, such as property rights, inheritance, marriage, and crime. The Mosaic Law was given to Israel as a covenant between God and his chosen people. It was designed to show them God's holiness, their sinfulness, and their need for a Savior. The Mosaic Law also foreshadowed the coming of Jesus Christ, who fulfilled the law by his perfect obedience and sacrifice. Christians are no longer under the Mosaic Law as a rule of life, as that only applies to the Israelite Jews of the Old Testament, but they can learn from its wisdom and apply its moral principles to their lives.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=295s 

You are mistaken, Jews did not write all of the Bible and I will explain why. The authorship of the Bible is a topic that has been widely debated and discussed by scholars and religious leaders. Although the exact origins of the Bible remain shrouded in mystery, it is generally accepted that the Bible was written by many different authors over centuries. The Old Testament, also known as the Hebrew Bible, provides a historical account of the people of Israel over around a thousand years. It begins with God's creation of the world and humankind and contains various stories, laws, and moral teachings that form the basis of religious life for both Jews and Christians.

For a long time, Jewish and Christian traditions held that a single author wrote the first five books of the Bible, known as the Torah and Pentateuch. These books are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Moses, the Hebrew prophet who led the Israelites out of captivity in Egypt and guided them towards the Promised Land, was believed to be that single author. However, after years of study and research, scholars still have many questions about the Bible's origins and authorship. While various theories have been proposed about who wrote the Bible, there is still no definitive answer.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=295s 

Hezbollah is a political and military organization of resistance fighters based in Lebanon that participating in the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The resistance has a strong military branch and is known for its use of unconventional methods such as suicide attacks, killings, and abductions of foreign soldiers, but not with the same ferocity as Israel. That said, What other option do the Hezbollah resistance fighters have in their defense of Palestine other than to fire a few puny rockets over Israel that are usually intercepted anyway by the Israeli Iron Dome defense system?

It is not inappropriate to talk about or support violent actions that could harm people or groups of people in the manner of Israel. However, it is important to encourage peaceful dialogue and non-violent solutions to conflicts but that is not something the Israelis wish to engage in and never have.

I suggest we talk about ways to foster peace and understanding between different groups of people and not take the one-sided stance you have displayed here. This is a constructive and respectful way to express your disagreement with someone's opinion or perspective. You are not attacking or dismissing their views, but inviting them to engage in a dialogue that can broaden both of your horizons. You are also acknowledging that there are multiple sides to any issue and that you are willing to listen and learn from others. By suggesting to talk about ways to foster peace and understanding, you are showing that you care about the common good and the well-being of all people, regardless of their differences. You are also implying that you have some ideas or suggestions on how to achieve this goal, which can spark a productive and meaningful conversation. You fail to do this.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c

This is a monster, not a man

Displaying anger at the beginning of this presentation violates the norms of professional communication and conduct and could damage your relationships, reputation and trust. I will not reciprocate with a similar form of emotion. Calm down.

Indeed, you are not a prophet who can foresee the future with divine inspiration. Instead, you are a futurist who analyses present trends and patterns and extrapolates them to possible future scenarios using scientific methods, data and evidence. Your predictions are not based on faith, intuition or the Bible. You understand the complexity and uncertainty of the future and do not make absolute or dogmatic predictions. Instead, you offer multiple perspectives and possibilities. Your goal is to inform, inspire and challenge your audience. However, you aim to manipulate, deceive or coerce your audience into believing a one-sided perspective that portrays Israel as faultless in the current conflict. The whole world knows of the war crimes they have committed in Gaza. Sugarcoating anything will not change facts.

Palestinians have not been trying to wipe out Israel. A statement such as that is fictitious. What you are engaged in here is a negative stereotype about every Arab nation in the Middle East and Israel by putting all of them into one boat by falsely stating they are all out to get Israel as if to excuse their current brutality.

Some analysts argue that the main source of hostility towards Israel in the Middle East is not the Palestinian issue, but rather the Iranian regime. They claim that Iran has been pursuing a radical agenda of spreading its influence and ideology across the region, and that it views Israel as a major obstacle to its ambitions. They point out that Iran has supported various militant groups that oppose Israel, such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and that it has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. They also cite Iran's nuclear program as a serious threat to Israel's security and existence. Therefore, they suggest that resolving the conflict with Iran is a more urgent and effective way of achieving peace and stability in the region than focusing on the Palestinian question.

The relationship between Iran and Israel has been tumultuous for many decades. The history of their relations can be divided into four main phases: the period of uncertainty from 1947 to 1953, a friendly period during the reign of the Pahlavi dynasty from 1953 to 1979, a worsening period post the Iranian Revolution between 1979 to 1990, and an ongoing period of open hostility since the Gulf War ended in 1991. In recent news, Iran has been accused of sponsoring and supporting the Palestinian resistance fighters in their recent attack on Israel on October 07th. Additionally, the UK Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps, has warned Iran to stop encouraging the Houthis to intervene in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza. It is important to note that the conflict between Iran and Israel is a complex issue with a long history, and it is not possible to provide a comprehensive overview in a single response.

I fully support Iran if they can finally bring peace to the Middle East when all attempts to broker peace with Israel by the United Nations passing one resolution after another have failed to achieve anything.

However, I do not advocate violence in the Middle East, nor do I support any parties or factions that resort to it. I believe that the only way to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region is through dialogue, cooperation and respect for human rights and international law. Violence only breeds more violence, and creates a cycle of hatred and revenge that harms innocent civilians and undermines the prospects of a peaceful resolution. I urge all sides to renounce violence and to engage in constructive negotiations that address the root causes of the conflict and the legitimate aspirations of all people. I also call on the international community to play a positive and impartial role in facilitating such a process and providing humanitarian assistance to those in need.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

God Thundered from His Throne: "But whosoever shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

There is nothing I could agree with more. But oh Israel, how many innocent children have you killed in Gaza and all in the false name of revenge, thousands, and how severe will your punishment be? I would not be in your shoes for all the money in the world.

The kind of Hypocrisy the Cutting Edge Ministries displays is the act of pretending to have beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually have. Hypocrisy is thus a kind of lie. Hypocrisy can also refer to the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticises another person. For example, a person who claims to be an environmentalist but drives a gas-guzzling car is a hypocrite. Hypocrisy can have negative effects on individuals and society, such as eroding trust, undermining moral values, and creating cynicism and resentment. 

In this instance pretending to have compassion for innocent children victimized by Pedophiles while at the same time edifying Israel for butchering thousands of children in Gaza is the height of intolerance.

You refuse to listen to or respect the views and beliefs of others, even when they do not agree with them. Intolerance is a form of discrimination that can lead to violence, oppression, and injustice. Intolerance can be based on religion, ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, or any other aspect of human diversity. Intolerance is harmful to individuals and societies, as it erodes trust, cooperation, and peace. Intolerance is also contrary to the values of democracy, human rights, and pluralism. To overcome intolerance, we need to foster a culture of dialogue, understanding, and mutual respect among people of different backgrounds and perspectives. We need to challenge stereotypes, prejudices, and hate speech that fuel intolerance. We need to promote education, awareness, and empathy that celebrate diversity and inclusion. We need to stand up for the rights and dignity of all people, regardless of their differences. Intolerance has no place in a civilized world. Surely you are not Christians but wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Wolves in sheep's clothing such as Cutting Edge Ministries are people who pretend to be good or trustworthy, but are actually malicious or deceitful. They use their disguise to manipulate, exploit, or harm others, often for their own benefit. Wolves in sheep's clothing can be found in many contexts, such as politics, business, religion, or personal relationships. They may appear to be friendly, helpful, or sincere, but their true intentions are hidden behind a mask of lies. Wolves in sheep's clothing can cause a lot of damage to the people they target, such as ruining their reputation, stealing their money, or breaking their hearts. Therefore, it is important to be careful and vigilant when dealing with strangers or acquaintances who seem too good to be true. One should always verify the facts, ask for references, and trust their intuition before trusting someone who claims to be a friend or an ally. Wolves in sheep's clothing are dangerous and cunning predators who prey on the innocent and the naive. They should be exposed and avoided at all costs.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Israel has been taken to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) by South Africa over its alleged violations of international law in the occupied Palestinian territories. South Africa, which has a history of opposing apartheid and colonialism, claims that Israel's policies and practices amount to racial discrimination, oppression and domination of the Palestinian people. South Africa also accuses Israel of violating the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter, and several human rights treaties. Israel denies these allegations and argues that the ICJ has no jurisdiction or authority to hear the case. Israel maintains that it is engaged in a legitimate self-defence against terrorism and that its actions are consistent with international law. The ICJ, which is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, is expected to hear oral arguments from both parties in the coming months and issue a ruling within a year. The ICJ's decisions are binding on the parties involved, but they have no enforcement mechanism and depend on the political will of the states concerned. The case is seen as a significant test of the role and influence of international law in resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The outcome of what is now taking place in the Hague could finally see the end of Israel’s illegal occupation of Gaza and see the signing of the covenant of Daniel Chapter 9 Verse 27 by the Antichrist. The end will then come.

Daniel 9:26 states that: And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself: and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined. KJV

Daniel 9: 27: And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.

The United States can call upon Blinken, Biden or Joe Bloggs but nothing will change what God has ordained, and no matter what type of slant, biased websites such as this put forward for Israel or the Republican party, the end of the United States is assured. A fatalistic and hostile attitude towards the United States and its allies is implied because it warrants a religious justification for violence because of what the United States has been engaged in for decades in the Middle East and right around the world. See Revelation Chapter 18.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The concept of a chosen people by God is a delicate and intricate issue. Some people hold the view that Jews are the chosen ones by God, while others contest this claim. It’s essential to keep in mind that God values everyone equally, no matter their racial or ethnic background. The Scripture says “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus”. Hence, it’s not suitable to imply that Gentiles are less than Jews. Rather, we should appreciate our diversity and respect our differences. 

That is why I find it to be incredibly offensive for Cutting Edge Ministries to call the Jews who occupy Israel God’s chosen people. That insinuates that Gentiles are not chosen by God or are inferior to Jews. I was a Gentile before I became a Born Again Christian, but after I was saved I became one of God’s chosen people while I remain a Gentile. Only a Jew would consider themselves as one of God’s chosen when most Jews are not saved.

Despite that fact after the atrocities that have been committed by Israel in Gaza global antisemitism has risen over 800%. And Benjamin Netanyahu and his team of thugs have made the greatest mistake of their lives if they believe the genocide they are committing in Gaza will remain unpunished. God does not make mistakes, only men make mistakes. This is a fundamental truth that we must accept and live by. God is perfect and infallible, and His will is always good and righteous. Men, on the other hand, are imperfect and fallible, and their will is often corrupted and sinful. Men make mistakes because they have free will, and they can choose to disobey God or follow their own desires.

But God never makes mistakes, because He knows everything and He always acts according to His plan and purpose. Therefore, we should not blame God for the problems and evils in the world, but rather acknowledge our own responsibility and accountability. We should also not question God's wisdom or justice, but rather trust His sovereignty and grace. God does not make mistakes, only men make mistakes. This is a statement of faith and humility that we should affirm and practice every day.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Cutting Edge Ministries has falsely claimed that America is close to having the disinterested voters they always wanted just before they staged their 'Christ'!

Some US presidents have used the term new world order to describe their vision of how international relations and cooperation should be shaped after major historical events or challenges. For example, President George H. W. Bush used the term to try to define the nature of the post-Cold War era and the spirit of great power cooperation that he hoped might materialize.

President Joe Biden used the term to refer to the shifting sands of geopolitical relations in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and the need for the US to lead and unite the rest of the free world in imposing sanctions and diplomatic pressure on Russia. The term new world order is not a fixed or official doctrine, but rather a rhetorical expression that reflects the aspirations and challenges of different presidents in different times.

The claim that the United States is involved in creating a New World Order or preparing for the Antichrist's arrival is a baseless allegation. It is a product of conspiracy thinking and religious distortion that exploits the fears and beliefs of the American public. There is no evidence or scriptural support for this assertion in the Holy Bible.

Blessings.

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The protocols of the elders of Zion is a notorious antisemitic hoax that has been used to incite hatred and violence against Jews. It is a fabricated document that claims to reveal a Jewish plot to dominate the world. The protocols have no basis in reality and have been exposed as a forgery many times. However, some people still believe in them and use them to justify their anti-Jewish views and actions. This video is one example of such propaganda, which tries to present the protocols as a credible source of information. The video is produced by Doc Marquis, a self-proclaimed former Illuminati member, and distributed by Cutting Edge Ministries, a Christian organization that promotes conspiracy theories. The video is full of lies, distortions and inaccuracies that have nothing to do with the truth. Anyone who takes this video seriously is either ignorant of the history and nature of the protocols, or deliberately spreading hate and misinformation. It is hard to say who is more reprehensible: Doc Marquis for creating this video, or Cutting Edge Ministries for selling it.

Blessings