https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

The term "watchman" is a term that you have stolen from goodness knows where that has its origins in the Middle English language. It is derived from the combination of two words: "watch" and "man." The word "watch" refers to the act of keeping guard or being vigilant, while "man" simply means a person.

The term "watchman" was first used around the year 1400 to describe a guard, sentinel, or lookout. It was also used figuratively to refer to a guardian or protector. In the context of law enforcement, watchmen were organized groups of men authorized by a state, government, city, or society to deter criminal activity and provide law enforcement.

In modern usage, a watchman is commonly understood as a person who keeps guard over a building at night to protect it from fire, vandals, or thieves. In the past, watchmen also patrolled the streets at night to maintain public safety.

Numerous websites on the internet claim to be "Watchmen for Jesus". Therefore, using this terminology is not original and could be seen as copyright infringement, which has happened many times before in your instance. However, in your situation, it's not entirely accurate. Instead, you should refer to yourself as a "watchman" and advocate for Judaism and Israel rather than for Jesus. 

You believe in Christ, but you are not actively spreading or defending your faith as a watchman for Christ.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

The idea of showing a mugshot at the beginning of a presentation as you have done in this presentation can vary depending on the context and the purpose of it being there. Here are a few potential reasons for including a mugshot at the beginning of a presentation:

Engagement: Using a mugshot can capture the audience's attention and create a sense of intrigue or curiosity, prompting them to pay closer attention to the content that follows.

Storytelling: A mugshot might be used as part of a storytelling technique to set the stage for the presentation, introduce a narrative, or provide context for the topic being discussed.

Relevance: If the presentation is related to law enforcement, crime, justice, or a similar topic, showing a mugshot at the beginning can be relevant to the subject matter and help to establish the theme of the presentation.

Impact: In some cases, a mugshot might be used to create an emotional impact or convey a particular message related to the content of the presentation.

It's important to consider the appropriateness and sensitivity of using a mugshot in a presentation, especially if it pertains to real individuals and their personal experiences. The context and purpose of the presentation should guide the decision to include such imagery.

However, no one wants to see what you look like as you hide behind dark glasses to cover up your deformities.You look to me as if you are almost blind?

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

A hearing on Friday concluded two days of arguments in a case brought by South Africa, a longtime critic of Israel's treatment of Palestinians, against Israel for the alleged crime of genocide against Palestinians. The case is being heard before the United Nations' International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands. The court's 15 judges were joined by one judge each from South Africa and Israel.

In nearly three hours of testimony, lawyers and experts on behalf of South Africa presented evidence arguing that Israel's three-month-long military campaign in Gaza has gone beyond war with Hamas — the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, killing 1,200 people and taking 240 hostages, according to Israel. The South African legal team argued Israel's offensive now includes all 2 million Palestinians who reside in Gaza.

"The level of Israel's killing is so extensive that nowhere is safe in Gaza," South African lawyer Adila Hassim said to the court.

"As I stand before you today, 23,210 Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces during the sustained attacks over the last three months," said Hassim, "at least 70% of whom are believed to be women and children."

Hassim said the Israeli military dropped 6,000 bombs a week on Gaza in the first three weeks of its campaign and dropped 2,000-pound bombs onto areas declared safe by Israel, including refugee camps.

As a result, she said, more than 1,800 families in Gaza have lost multiple family members, and 85% of all Gazans have been forced to flee their homes.

"This killing is nothing short of destruction of Palestinian life," Hassim said. "It is inflicted deliberately. No one is spared. Not even newborn babies. The scale of Palestinian child killings in Gaza is such that U.N. chiefs have described it as a 'graveyard for children.' "

South Africa's delegation insisted that genocidal intent is shown not only by the way Israel has launched its military campaign but by comments from leaders like Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. In late October in an address to Israeli forces, Netanyahu invoked the story of Amalek, a figure in the Hebrew Bible who tried to destroy the Jewish people.

"This refers to the biblical command by God to Saul of the retaliatory destruction of an entire group of people," said South African legal scholar Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, who said Netanyahu's reference was meant to justify genocide.

Netanyahu responded swiftly to South Africa's testimony. "The hypocrisy of South Africa knows no bounds," he said in a video statement immediately following the first day of testimony in The Hague. "The state of Israel is accused of genocide at a time when it is fighting genocide."

In Israel's opening arguments before the court on Friday, Israeli lawyer Tal Becker said Israel is "singularly aware" of why the Genocide Convention was adopted, referring to the systematic murder of 6 million Jews in the Holocaust, which gave birth to the convention invoked in these proceedings.

"The applicant has now sought to invoke this term in the context of Israel's conduct in a war it did not start and did not want," Becker said, "a war in which Israel is defending itself against Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and other terrorist organisations whose brutality knows no bounds."

While the court proceedings unfolded, demonstrators outside the Peace Palace made their voices heard. Palestinian and Israeli protesters gathered, watching the trial on large screens. In a tense atmosphere, Palestinian protesters expressed their dissatisfaction with Israel's defense by chanting slogans such as "Yalancı" (liar).

The trial, which has garnered international attention, will now await further developments as the court evaluates the arguments presented by both parties.

However, there is no doubt at all that Israel is guilty of some of the worst atrocities committed by any nation in history against another nation. All one has to do is turn on the television to see what is taking place daily to know that reality. The IDF are monsters impersonating as men and surely they must be brought to justice for their horrible war crimes. What they are engaged in is far worse than anything Hitler ever did to the Jews in the Second World War. 

Storming a building taking out all the men and shooting them in the back is inexcusable. They all had families and small children. Anyone who condones these sorts of actions are just as bad as the perpetrators themselves. All of this is an abomination against the whole of humanity, not just Palestine.

The bombing is never ceasing and goes on day and night, while they are virtually being starved to death due to Israel blocking their supplies of water, food and medicine at the border. Worse still is that the whole world knows what is going on with the United States blocking one UN resolution after another which allows the bombing to continue. If they get Trump as their next president there can't be any doubts they will get what they deserve.

 Let us hope and pray that these Israeli behemoths get what they have coming to them as they must, according to the prophecies of the Bible.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk 

It's important to approach the war between Israel and Gaza with sensitivity, considering the complex and sensitive nature of the conflict. The current situation has a long history and is deeply rooted in geopolitical, historical, and religious factors. The conflict has resulted in significant human suffering and loss on both sides.

It's crucial to recognize that finding a solution to this conflict is incredibly challenging and requires a deep understanding of the complexities involved. Many individuals and organisations are working tirelessly to find a peaceful resolution and alleviate the suffering of those affected by the conflict.

It's also important to acknowledge that discussing this topic may evoke strong emotions and differing perspectives. It's essential to engage in constructive dialogue and seek to understand the experiences and perspectives of all those involved.

Ultimately, achieving peace in the region will require sustained efforts, dialogue, empathy, and a commitment to finding a just and lasting resolution that respects the rights and aspirations of all affected parties.

Unfortunately for them, Israel is never going to win the war against Gaza. They can continue with their current brutality against the Palestinians for decades and decades, fueling the industrial war machine of the United States for as long as they like: forever if they wish. 

However, the Bible tells us that there is going to be a year covenant signed by the Antichrist, which will lead to a temporary type of peace that will remain in place until the return of the Lord. Accordingly, Israel is doomed to ultimate failure. Most insist that there will be a two-state solution. Even though Netanyahu does not agree to this ultimate solution, he is just one man whose days are numbered.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

I want to make it clear that I have complete control over my comments on this platform. It's my decision what I choose to say here and I don't want anyone to interfere with my content. I am entitled to express myself freely on the internet without any censorship or manipulation from external parties. Deleting or not showing my comments is not an option, as it goes against my right to free speech.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

I am surprised to see that these books are still available for purchase when they should have expired a long time ago. It cannot be because of high sales, but rather because no one wants them. How cheeky it is to try and sell this outdated material!

However, there could be several reasons why these books are still in stock. Firstly, they might not be popular, so they remain unsold for longer periods. Secondly, some books are printed only when they are ordered, so they never go out of stock. Thirdly, certain books cater to specific audiences, and although they may not sell in large quantities, they are still valuable to those interested in the subject matter. Finally, books that serve as reference or educational material may remain in circulation even after newer editions are released.

Different people have different opinions about the value of books. While some may think that certain books are outdated, others may still find them valuable for historical or sentimental reasons. Therefore, it's essential to be considerate and respectful of varying perspectives when donating or discarding books.

If you want to dispose of books that contain outdated or irrational information, it's crucial to do so in a sensitive manner. Instead of throwing them away, consider donating them to an organization or individual who may find them useful.

Alternatively, if you find that these books are not worth the time of day, it's best to avoid ordering them altogether. That is my best advice with reference to the books that are for sale at this channel.

Ultimately, the decision to order and keep, donate, or dispose of books should be made thoughtfully, considering the potential impact and respecting differing viewpoints.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

There are some developments in the Israel-Gaza conflict that indicate progress towards a resolution. 

Here are some key points:

1. It seems that the European Union (EU) has been discussing the Israel-Gaza conflict and the possibility of a peace treaty. Here are some relevant details:

2. Israel's foreign minister avoided discussing a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict during a meeting with European officials.

3. The EU's foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, has been pressing Israel on the need for a two-state solution and expressed concerns about the effectiveness of Israel's plan to destroy Hamas in Gaza.The EU has drafted a 10-point plan for a "credible, comprehensive solution" to the Israel-Palestine conflict.

4. Qatar has also been actively involved in seeking a peaceful resolution to the Israel-Gaza conflict. Qatar has played a significant role in mediating between Israel and Hamas, the governing authority in Gaza. Qatari negotiators have facilitated agreements between the two parties, including the positioning of Israeli tanks during truces. Qatar has also been engaged in diplomatic efforts to renew humanitarian pauses and expressed hope for building upon the progress made in resolving the conflict. Qatar's assertive diplomacy and business connections have positioned it as a centre for conflict resolution in the region. The country's role as a U.S. ally has allowed it to influence Hamas and play a mediating role with Israel.

Blessings

 https://duckduckgo.com/?q=James+Key&t=operav&ia=web

It's important to note that if Trump wins the Republican nomination, that doesn't necessarily mean he is the Antichrist. Similarly, even if he wins the next election, it doesn't prove he is the Antichrist. The real issue is not about Trump winning but rather that as Biden is not a satisfactory candidate he may lose and Trump may win if nominated. 

Let's wait and see who the Democrats will nominate. They may still have a surprise candidate up their sleeve. One thing is for sure: the race is never over until it's finished.

Speculating about the identity of the Antichrist is a topic that has been widely discussed in religious and theological circles. However, it's important to approach this topic with sensitivity and respect for different beliefs and opinions. Here are some points to consider:

The concept of the Antichrist varies across different religious traditions, including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. In Christianity, the Antichrist is often associated with a figure who embodies evil and opposes the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Speculating about the identity of the Antichrist can lead to unfounded rumors, fear, and division. It's important to approach discussions about eschatological figures with humility and a spirit of understanding.

Instead of focusing on speculation about the Antichrist, many religious traditions emphasize the importance of living according to moral and ethical principles, showing compassion and empathy towards others, and striving for personal spiritual growth.

Ultimately, discussions about the Antichrist should be approached with care and respect for diverse beliefs. It's advisable to engage in meaningful dialogue and seek to understand different perspectives rather than engaging in speculation about specific individuals.

It's important to approach political discussions with objectivity and respect for differing viewpoints. The notion of someone being the Antichrist is a belief held by some individuals based on religious interpretations, and it's essential to recognise that this belief is subjective and varies among different religious and cultural traditions.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Epstein badly wanted a 'baby farm' to impregnate minor age girls for his ultra-rich buddies.

Prince Andrew

It's important to critically evaluate the credibility of sources, especially when the information is controversial and lacks corroborating evidence. In cases like this, it's crucial to rely on verified and reputable sources before accepting any claims as true.

It's also important to consider the reliability and credibility of the individual or organisation making the claim. In the case of controversial allegations, it's essential to seek information from multiple credible sources to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the situation.

Given the sensitive nature of the topic and the lack of concrete evidence, it's important to approach such claims with caution and verify their authenticity through reliable and trusted sources.

As such, I find a statement such as this very hard to accept when it only comes from one source that is hardly credible to begin with. That man is dead, and Epstein he took all his secrets to the grave with him.

It makes me wonder what sort of demon this website operates under when you come out with such outlandish statements. All of this is floundering within the realms of the unbelievable and ridiculous. It makes me believe you deserve to have Trump again for president, which is true enough.

Randy Andy had a family to begin with, so why would someone like him be interested in impregnating young girls? If there is an alleged list of the super rich involved in this activity publish a few more names added to Bill Clinton. You won't be able to because they do not exist. This is just a part of a sensationalist agenda to attract people to your site to sell books. 

This is pure bullshit: nothing more and nothing less.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCdrH550XDE 

In Christianity, the concept of repentance is often associated with the idea of turning away from sin and seeking forgiveness. When someone apologizes for their sins, it is an acknowledgment of wrongdoing and a desire to make amends. However, the idea of true repentance goes beyond a simple apology.

According to Christian beliefs, true repentance involves a deep and sincere change of heart and mind. It is not just about saying sorry, but about genuinely turning away from sinful behavior and seeking a new way of living. This is where the concept of being "born again" comes into play.

The phrase "born again" comes from a passage in the New Testament where Jesus speaks to a religious leader named Nicodemus. In this conversation, Jesus emphasizes the need for spiritual rebirth or transformation. This transformation involves a profound change at the core of a person's being, which is brought about by faith in Jesus Christ and the work of the Holy Spirit.

So, when someone says they are sorry or apologizes for their sins, it is an important step, but it is not the entirety of true repentance as described in the Bible. True repentance involves a genuine transformation of the individual's inner life, marked by a turning away from sin and a turning towards God.

It's important to note that different Christian denominations may have varying interpretations of these concepts, so individual beliefs and practices can differ.

In Judaism, the concept of repentance is important for seeking forgiveness. Saying sorry is just the first step in the process of repentance, but it is not sufficient on its own to be "saved." The process of repentance, or teshuvah, involves several steps, including:

Regret: Expressing sincere remorse for one's actions.

Cessation: Stopping the harmful behavior.

Confession: Confessing the wrongdoing and asking for forgiveness from those who were harmed.

Restitution: Making amends for any damage caused, if possible.

Resolution: Making a commitment not to repeat the harmful behavior.

In Judaism, the idea of being "saved" is not typically framed in the same way as in some other religious traditions. Instead, the emphasis is often on seeking forgiveness and atonement, both from other people and from God. The process of teshuvah is seen as a way to restore one's relationship with God and with others.

It's important to note that the specifics of repentance and forgiveness can vary among different Jewish denominations and interpretations of Jewish law.

I'm sorry, but suggesting that saying sorry or asking for forgiveness as the way to salvation is a teaching of Judaism, not Christianity. As a Christian, I believe that true repentance is the path to glory, and I have been saved because I have repented. While apologizing and seeking forgiveness is the first step taught by Jews, it's not sufficient for attaining salvation.

Do you understand the difference between forgiveness and repentance? I don't think you can, and that's why you will continue to believe in Judaism until your death. However, God will ultimately judge you based on what you teach, and it's wrong to teach that repentance is not necessary for salvation.

Blessings