https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHhMOv8Xggc

Speaking in tongues is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is often associated with certain religious practices. Here are some key points to consider:

Glossolalia: Glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, is a practice in which individuals vocalize speech-like sounds that are not easily understood. This phenomenon is often associated with certain religious or spiritual experiences.

Religious and Cultural Context: Speaking in tongues is a significant aspect of some Christian traditions, particularly within charismatic and Pentecostal communities. It is often viewed as a form of spiritual communication with a higher power. 

Allen Nolan

Diverse Perspectives: Views on speaking in tongues vary widely among religious scholars, practitioners, and skeptics. Some believe it to be a genuine spiritual gift, while others may interpret it differently.

Cultural Interpretations: In some cultures, speaking in tongues may be perceived as a genuine expression of religious fervor and connection to the divine, while in others, it may be met with skepticism or even concern.

Psychological and Anthropological Perspectives: From a psychological and anthropological standpoint, glossolalia has been studied as a cultural and linguistic phenomenon, with researchers exploring its origins, cultural significance, and potential psychological underpinnings.

Interpretation and Beliefs: Beliefs about speaking in tongues are deeply interconnected with religious, cultural, and personal interpretations. Individuals may view it as a profound spiritual experience, a learned behavior, a psychological manifestation, or something else entirely.

Speaking in tongues is not a natural or authentic phenomenon. It is usually feigned and may be a manifestation of evil within the person practicing it.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIWNii7tVfk

It's important to note that different Christian denominations may have varying beliefs and practices regarding public and private expressions of faith, repentance, and salvation. The concept of publicly acknowledging one's faith and repentance in front of a congregation is often associated with certain denominations and traditions.

Here are some points to consider regarding this topic:

Variety of Practices: Different Christian denominations may have different practices when it comes to public displays of repentance and acceptance of Christ's plan of salvation. Some may emphasize the importance of public confession and repentance, while others may place more emphasis on private, personal expressions of faith.

Biblical Perspectives: The Bible contains various teachings on the topic of repentance and salvation. Some passages emphasise the importance of openly confessing one's faith, while others speak to the significance of personal, private prayer and repentance.

Individual Beliefs: Personal beliefs and interpretations of scripture also play a significant role in how individuals approach the act of repentance and acceptance of Christ's salvation. Some people may feel called to publicly express their faith and repentance, while others may find a more personal, private approach to be meaningful.

Church Community: The dynamics of a specific church community can also influence how individuals approach the act of repentance. Some congregations may place a strong emphasis on public displays of faith, while others may prioritize a more private and personal approach.

It's essential for individuals to seek guidance from their religious leaders and to engage in thoughtful reflection and study of scripture to discern how they should approach the act of repentance and acceptance of Christ's plan of salvation. Ultimately, the decision to publicly or privately express one's faith and repentance is a deeply personal and spiritual matter.

Being "Born Again" in a public setting is often associated with religious or spiritual experiences, particularly within the Christian faith. The idea of a public spectacle in the eyes of God and men refers to an outward demonstration of one's faith or a public declaration of spiritual transformation.

In Christian tradition, being "Born Again" is linked to a personal commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, often marked by a public declaration of faith, such as through baptism or a public profession of faith in a religious gathering.

The concept of a public spectacle in the eyes of God and men reflects the desire for one's spiritual transformation to be witnessed and acknowledged by both the divine and the community. This public aspect can serve as a powerful symbol of personal renewal and a commitment to living out one's faith in a visible and tangible way.

It's important to note that interpretations of "Born Again" experiences and their public expression can vary widely across different Christian denominations and individual believers. The significance of the public aspect often depends on the specific beliefs and practices of a particular religious community.

As a general practice, Pentecostals do not engage in public displays of repentance and salvation. Instead, they prefer to do it privately while in a public setting. However, this can sometimes lead to the perception of Pentecostals as abnormal or unsaved, although these are not necessarily my views. When I was a teenager attending a Baptist Church 55 years ago, I went to the front of the church after the call was made and publicly repented and accepted Christ as my saviour.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

As a Fundamentalist Born Again Christian, I hold the Bible in high regard and consider it to be the ultimate source of guidance and truth. The belief that the Bible is the sole authoritative source of divine revelation is a fundamental tenet of many Christian denominations. Here are a few points to consider based on my statement:

Sola Scriptura**: The belief in "Sola Scriptura" (Scripture alone) is a key principle of many Protestant Christian traditions, emphasizing the Bible as the ultimate authority for faith and practice.

Interpretation**: Different Christian denominations and individuals may interpret the Bible in various ways, leading to diverse theological perspectives and doctrinal differences. This diversity can sometimes lead to disagreements about the interpretation of certain passages.

Ancillary Works**: While some Christians rely solely on the Bible for spiritual guidance, others may find value in supplementary works such as commentaries, theological writings, and historical context to aid in understanding the scriptures.

Personal Conviction**: Your belief in the sufficiency of the Bible is a personal conviction, and it's important to respectfully engage with others who may hold different perspectives on the role of extra-biblical works in understanding the scriptures.

It's important to acknowledge that Christians hold a range of views on the relationship between the Bible and other sources of spiritual insight. Ultimately, these perspectives are shaped by individual or denominational beliefs and interpretations.

It's important to approach the Bible with a discerning mind, considering various interpretations and perspectives while also comparing them to the actual text of the Bible. The Bible itself is considered by many to be the infallible word of God, and therefore, it's crucial to test any human interpretations or doctrines against the teachings and principles found within the Bible. This approach allows for a thoughtful and well-rounded understanding of the scriptures, acknowledging the potential for different interpretations while also prioritising the integrity of the biblical text.

It is also important to stick to one interpretation of the Bible without constantly searching for new verses in different versions of the Bible to support personal arguments. Some people believe in the importance of a single, consistent interpretation, I am of that school.

Others may see value in exploring different perspectives and interpretations. The use of original Hebrew or Greek texts for interpretation is also a subject of debate among scholars and religious communities. It's a valid perspective that the version of a text someone chooses to read can reflect their preference and that should be enough.

People may select a specific version based on factors such as language, cultural relevance, or personal interpretation. The decision to favour a particular version doesn't necessarily require proving one's choice by referring to the original texts to prove anything. This is especially true for literary works that have been translated multiple times, as different translations can offer unique insights and interpretations. Ultimately, the most important thing is to engage with the text in a way that resonates with the individual reader, regardless of the version they choose.

Ultimately, the approach to interpreting religious texts is deeply personal, and individuals often find meaning and guidance in different ways but going back to the original texts is not one of those ways because the translation has already been performed.

I am a King James reader (KJV): Also known as the Authorised Version, this is one of the most widely known English translations of the Bible, first published in 1611.

The New Living Translation (NLT) is a modern English translation of the Bible that aims to be both accurate and readable. The NLT is based on the most recent scholarship in the theory of translation, and the translators sought to render the message of the original texts of Scripture into contemporary English. It combines the latest biblical scholarship with a clear, dynamic writing style that aims to communicate God's Word powerfully to all readers.

While the NLT is available in numerous editions and study Bible editions, such as The Life Application Study Bible and The Life Recovery Bible, some readers may prefer to consult different versions of the Bible for various reasons. It's common for readers to refer to different versions of the NLT or other translations to gain different perspectives, compare translations, or explore different nuances of the text.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

The Bible is the inspired word of God and does not contradict itself. However, some people may misunderstand or misinterpret some passages that seem to say opposite things. To avoid this, we need to consider the context, the writer's viewpoint, the genre, the language, and the intended audience of each passage. We also need to compare Scripture with Scripture and use clear and explicit teachings to explain the implicit and unclear ones. The Bible itself warns us not to twist or distort its teachings (2 Peter 3:16). The Bible also tells us to study it carefully and correctly (2 Timothy 2:15). By doing so, we can discover the harmony and truth of God's word.

Unfortunately, that is what you are doing, and I refuse to have anything to do with whatever spirit you operate under. I will not watch you on YouTube again. However, you look as if you are doing quite well otherwise racking the money in.

A con man is an individual who deceives others by lying to them to obtain their money or property. The term "con man" is short for "confidence man" because they often gain the trust or confidence of their victims before defrauding them. Con men use a variety of techniques to manipulate people, such as pretending to be someone else, making false promises, creating fake documents, exploiting people's religious beliefs, or preying on people's emotions. Examples of con men include those who run pyramid schemes, lottery scams, romance scams, identity thefts, and even churches. Although most con men eventually get caught, they can often succeed for a time.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

The question of whether the Bible says there will be a third temple is not easy to answer. Different interpretations of biblical prophecies may lead to different conclusions. Some passages seem to imply that a third temple will be built in Jerusalem before the return of Jesus Christ, while others suggest that the temple is symbolic of God's people or presence.

One passage that is often cited as evidence for a third temple is Daniel 9:27, which mentions a "prince who is to come" who will make a covenant with many for one week and then put an end to sacrifice and offering in the middle of the week. Some Christians believe that this prince is the Antichrist, who will make a peace treaty with Israel and allow them to rebuild the temple, only to break the treaty and desecrate the temple after three and a half years. However, this interpretation is not universally accepted, and some scholars argue that the prince is actually a reference to Jesus or a historical figure such as Antiochus Epiphanes, who persecuted the Jews and defiled the second temple in the second century BC .

Another passage that is often used to support the idea of a third temple is 2 Thessalonians 2:4, which says that the "man of lawlessness" will exalt himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. Some Christians interpret this as meaning that the Antichrist will claim to be God in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, fulfilling Daniel's prophecy. However, others point out that the Greek word for temple (naos) can also mean a shrine or a sanctuary, and that it is used metaphorically in other parts of the New Testament to refer to the church or the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 3:16-17; 6:19; Ephesians 2:21). Therefore, it is possible that the man of lawlessness will not literally sit in a physical temple, but rather oppose and deceive God's people .

A third passage that is sometimes seen as a proof for a third temple is Revelation 11:1-2, which describes John measuring the temple of God and the altar, and counting those who worship there, while leaving out the outer court which is given to the Gentiles who will trample the holy city for forty-two months. Some Christians take this as a literal description of a future temple in Jerusalem that will be partially occupied by Gentile forces during the tribulation period. However, others argue that this vision is symbolic of God's protection and judgment of His faithful witnesses, and that the temple represents His presence among them. They also note that Revelation uses imagery from Ezekiel's vision of a restored temple (Ezekiel 40-48), which many believe is not a literal blueprint for a future building, but rather a picture of God's ideal relationship with His people .

In conclusion, there is no clear consensus among Christians on whether the Bible says there will be a third temple or not. Some see it as a necessary fulfilment of prophecy before Christ's return, while others see it as irrelevant or allegorical. Ultimately, what matters most is not the physical structure of a temple, but the spiritual reality of God's dwelling with His people through His Son and His Spirit and that is the temple the Bible is referring to.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

One of the most popular beliefs among some Christians is the idea of a rapture, a sudden and miraculous event in which faithful believers are taken up to heaven before the end of the world. However, this concept is not found anywhere in the Bible, and is based on a misinterpretation of some verses. The word "rapture" comes from the Latin word "rapere", which means "to snatch away". Some people use this word to translate the Greek word "harpazo", which appears in 1 Thessalonians 4:17. In this verse, Paul writes that "we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air". However, Paul is not describing a rapture, but a resurrection. He is talking about the second coming of Christ, when he will raise the dead and transform the living into immortal bodies. Paul is using the imagery of a royal visit, when people would go out of the city to welcome a king and escort him back. Similarly, Christians will go up to meet Christ in the air and then accompany him to the earth. This is not a secret or sudden event, but a glorious and public one. The Bible does not describe a rapture, but a resurrection.

John Nelson Darby is recognized as the father of dispensationalism later made popular in the United States by Cyrus Scofield's Scofield Reference Bible. Charles Henry Mackintosh, 1820–1896, with his popular style spread Darby's teachings to humbler elements in society and may be regarded as the journalist of the Brethren Movement. CHM popularised Darby more than any other Brethren author. As there was no Christian teaching of a “rapture” before Darby began preaching about it in the 1830s, he is sometimes credited with originating the "secret rapture" theory wherein Christ will suddenly remove His bride, the Church, from this world before the judgments of the tribulation. Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy. They believe that, while the methodologies of God may change, His purposes to bless Israel will never be forgotten, just as He has shown unmerited favour to the Church, He will do so to a remnant of Israel to fulfill all the promises made to the genetic seed of Abraham. I am not a dispensationalist; it is unbiblical and nor do I favour Israel. 

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

As a rule, it is Christian scholars and clergy who lead and teach the religious doctrine. However, you have had no official training whatsoever in Biblical theology. Although Jews can provide academic or historical information about Christianity, it is necessary to honor the boundaries of each religion and not cause conflicts between faiths.

As a Messianic Jew, you should not travel to different places to teach Christianity since it can be harmful to those who listen to your misguided perspectives. Your position may prevent you from seeing the world objectively and lead you to pass on your biased attitudes to others. That is what you are doing at your channel. In other words, you could be dangerous to the uninitiated.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

 Books that are classified as prophecy books include:

The Bible: Contains several books and passages that are considered to contain prophecies about future events.

Most importantly, The Bible contains a significant amount of prophecy. Many books in the Bible contain prophecies about future events, including the coming of Jesus Christ, the end times, and the future of Israel. Here are some key points about prophecy in the Bible:

Prophecy in the Old Testament: The Old Testament contains numerous prophecies about the coming Messiah, the establishment of the kingdom of God, and the fate of nations. For example, the books of Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel contain extensive prophecies about future events.

Prophecy in the New Testament: The New Testament also includes prophecies, particularly in the book of Revelation, which describes future events leading up to the return of Jesus Christ and the establishment of God's kingdom.

Fulfillment of Prophecies: Many prophecies in the Bible are believed by Christians to have been fulfilled, particularly those concerning the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The fulfillment of these prophecies is a cornerstone of Christian faith.

Importance of Prophecy: Prophecy is considered important in the Bible as it demonstrates the divine inspiration of the text and provides a framework for understanding God's plan for humanity

The Quran: Contains prophecies about future events and the end of the world.

Nostradamus's Prophecies: The writings of Nostradamus, a 16th-century French astrologer and physician, are often considered prophetic but should not be treated with any seriousness.

These are some examples of books that are often classified as prophecy books, known for containing accounts of prophetic or apocalyptic visions and predictions.

Books written by men can be considered prophetic, as the concept of prophecy is not limited to a specific gender. The term "prophetic" is often associated with the ability to predict or inspire future events, social changes, or spiritual insights. Many influential works written by men have been considered prophetic due to their ability to foresee or inspire significant developments in various fields. Here are a few examples of books written by men that are often considered prophetic:

"1984" by George Orwell**: This dystopian novel has been widely regarded as prophetic due to its portrayal of a totalitarian society and its themes related to surveillance, propaganda, and authoritarianism.

"Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley**: Another influential dystopian novel, Huxley's work has been seen as prophetic in its exploration of a future society controlled by technology, consumerism, and psychological manipulation.

"Fahrenheit 451" by Ray Bradbury**: This classic novel is often considered prophetic for its warnings about censorship, the impact of mass media, and the consequences of intellectual suppression.

"The Singularity Is Near" by Ray Kurzweil**: In this non-fiction work, Kurzweil discusses the concept of technological singularity and its potential implications for the future of humanity, making bold predictions about the merging of human intelligence with artificial intelligence.

These examples illustrate how books written by men can indeed be considered prophetic, offering insights into future possibilities, societal trends, and technological advancements.

The guidelines for calling a book "prophetic in nature" can vary depending on the context in which the term is used. In general, when referring to a book as "prophetic," it often implies that the book contains insights, predictions, or messages that are believed to have a divine or inspired origin.

Here are some general guidelines to consider when characterising a book as "prophetic in nature":

Content: The content of the book should contain messages or insights that are considered to be of a prophetic nature. This can include predictions about future events, moral or spiritual guidance, or insights into the human condition.

Inspiration: The book should be perceived as having been inspired by a divine source or as conveying messages from a higher power or spiritual realm. This inspiration can be explicit within the text or widely accepted by a particular religious or spiritual community.

Impact: Consider the impact of the book on its readers or followers. A prophetic book often has a significant influence on individuals, communities, or even entire societies, shaping beliefs, practices, and worldviews.

Context: Assess the cultural, historical, and religious context in which the book was written and received. Understanding the context can provide insights into why the book is considered prophetic and how it has been interpreted over time.

Recognition: Consider whether the book has been officially recognised or accepted as prophetic within a specific religious or spiritual tradition. Official endorsement by religious authorities or traditions can play a significant role in labeling a book as prophetic.

Interpretation: Recognise that the designation of a book as "prophetic in nature" can be subjective and open to interpretation. Different individuals and religious communities may have varying perspectives on what constitutes a prophetic text.

It's important to note that the criteria for labeling a book as prophetic can differ across religious and cultural traditions. Some well-known examples of books considered prophetic in nature include the Bible, the Quran, the Bhagavad Gita, and the Book of Mormon, among others.

Prophecy can be a complex and subjective topic. It's often associated with predicting the future or delivering messages from a divine source. The interpretation of prophecy can vary widely among different belief systems and individuals.

In the context of the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, prophecy can encompass various elements, including:

Foretelling the Future: Many prophecies in the Hebrew and Christian Bibles are indeed about predicting future events. These can range from specific historical events to broader themes related to the future of humanity.

Divine Messages: Prophecy can also involve delivering messages from a divine source, often with guidance, warnings, or teachings for people to follow.

Interpretation and Application: The interpretation of prophetic writings can be a subject of debate and discussion among scholars and believers. Some may view certain passages as directly prophetic, while others may interpret them symbolically or metaphorically.

Fulfillment: Another aspect of prophecy is the concept of fulfillment, where certain events or conditions are seen as fulfilling the predictions or messages of previous prophecies.

It's important to acknowledge that interpretations of prophecy can vary widely, and different individuals and religious traditions may have diverse perspectives on what constitutes prophecy and how it applies to their beliefs and practices.

However, your writings do not contain anything of a prophetic nature. Rather, they relate to the interpretation of the Hebrew and Christian Bibles only.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

The term "watchman" is a term that you have stolen from goodness knows where that has its origins in the Middle English language. It is derived from the combination of two words: "watch" and "man." The word "watch" refers to the act of keeping guard or being vigilant, while "man" simply means a person.

The term "watchman" was first used around the year 1400 to describe a guard, sentinel, or lookout. It was also used figuratively to refer to a guardian or protector. In the context of law enforcement, watchmen were organized groups of men authorized by a state, government, city, or society to deter criminal activity and provide law enforcement.

In modern usage, a watchman is commonly understood as a person who keeps guard over a building at night to protect it from fire, vandals, or thieves. In the past, watchmen also patrolled the streets at night to maintain public safety.

Numerous websites on the internet claim to be "Watchmen for Jesus". Therefore, using this terminology is not original and could be seen as copyright infringement, which has happened many times before in your instance. However, in your situation, it's not entirely accurate. Instead, you should refer to yourself as a "watchman" and advocate for Judaism and Israel rather than for Jesus. 

You believe in Christ, but you are not actively spreading or defending your faith as a watchman for Christ.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

The idea of showing a mugshot at the beginning of a presentation as you have done in this presentation can vary depending on the context and the purpose of it being there. Here are a few potential reasons for including a mugshot at the beginning of a presentation:

Engagement: Using a mugshot can capture the audience's attention and create a sense of intrigue or curiosity, prompting them to pay closer attention to the content that follows.

Storytelling: A mugshot might be used as part of a storytelling technique to set the stage for the presentation, introduce a narrative, or provide context for the topic being discussed.

Relevance: If the presentation is related to law enforcement, crime, justice, or a similar topic, showing a mugshot at the beginning can be relevant to the subject matter and help to establish the theme of the presentation.

Impact: In some cases, a mugshot might be used to create an emotional impact or convey a particular message related to the content of the presentation.

It's important to consider the appropriateness and sensitivity of using a mugshot in a presentation, especially if it pertains to real individuals and their personal experiences. The context and purpose of the presentation should guide the decision to include such imagery.

However, no one wants to see what you look like as you hide behind dark glasses to cover up your deformities.You look to me as if you are almost blind?

Blessings