https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xgdCG1rgWYc

Presidential Hopeful Donald Trump

Religious misinformation such as you are propagating at your channel by calling Trump the Antichrist refers to false or misleading information that is spread about religious beliefs, practices, or institutions. It can take various forms, such as rumours, conspiracy theories, or deliberate distortions of religious teachings. Religious misinformation can be spread through various channels, including social media, websites, or even in-person conversations.

It can have harmful effects by promoting prejudice, intolerance, or misunderstanding among different religious groups. Examples of religious misinformation include false claims about religious texts, misrepresentations of religious rituals, or the propagation of stereotypes about certain religious communities. It is important to critically evaluate information and seek reliable sources to avoid being misled by religious misinformation.

Religious misinformation has a brief lifetime and generally soon fades, especially in today's interconnected world where information spreads rapidly. However, some misinformation can persist for longer periods with exceptions like the fake Rapture. 

Donald Trump continues to be a prominent figure in global news due to a variety of reasons, including his previous presidency, his potential future political aspirations, and his controversial actions and statements. 

This ongoing attention has naturally led to significant interest and discussions about him in various comment sections across different media platforms. The combination of his past actions and his potential influence on future events ensures that people continue to closely follow his activities and express their opinions about him.

There has been speculation that Donald Trump could be the Antichrist, but this belief is likely to fade away after the upcoming U.S. elections. Even if he wins, he may not fulfil the prophecies of the Bible, such as the confirmation of the treaty mentioned in Daniel Chapter 9:27. Therefore, interest in this topic may significantly diminish. The amount of time you have left with this scam is limited. 

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

The situation in Gaza is a complex and sensitive issue. The ongoing conflict has led to the loss of many innocent lives, including women and children. It's important to acknowledge the suffering and loss experienced by the people in the region.

The situation in Gaza is deeply political and has historical, cultural, and religious roots. It's a result of a long-standing conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, and finding a peaceful resolution is a challenging task. The loss of innocent lives, especially women and children, is a tragedy that affects everyone.

It's important for the international community to work towards a peaceful and sustainable solution to the conflict in the region. This involves respecting human rights, protecting civilians, and promoting dialogue and negotiation as a means to resolve differences.

It's crucial to approach discussions about such sensitive topics with empathy, understanding, and a commitment to finding peaceful solutions that prioritize the safety and well-being of all people involved.

However, the argument that you keep on referring to about October the 07th and the killing of 1300 Jews by the Palestinian resistance fighters hardly warrants consideration in comparison to the slaughter of 26,000 slaughtered so far by Israel with the toll rising daily. Israel has been brought to trial by the ICJ and found guilty of genocide which lays your pathetic defense of Israel to rest.

I was not saddened by what happened in Israel on October the 07th. However, I am still appalled and shocked to see the mass murder in Gaza taking place every day by Israel while at the same time pleased to see that something has at last been done to stop the wanton slaughter of innocent women and children by the Israeli psychopaths who are now classified by an international court as war criminals.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk

One possible common denominator for those who are coming out with conspiracy theories related to the Bible is a **lack of trust** in the established sources of authority and information, such as the government, the media, or the scientific community. Some Christians may feel that these sources are **biased against** their faith or worldview, and may seek alternative explanations that align with their beliefs and values. For example, some Christians may be drawn to QAnon, a movement that claims that Donald Trump is waging a secret war against a worldwide cabal of Satan-worshiping pedophiles. According to one follower of QAnon, she feels that God led her to this movement and that she does not need to verify its claims.

Another possible common denominator is a **misunderstanding** of the nature and purpose of biblical prophecy. Some Christians may interpret certain passages of the Bible, especially those in the books of Daniel and Revelation, as **predicting** specific events or figures in the present or near future. For example, some Christians may believe that a public figure is the Antichrist, or that a new technology is the mark of the beast, or that a global crisis is a sign of the end times. However, these interpretations are often based on **speculation** and **selective reading** of the biblical texts, rather than on sound exegesis and historical context. Moreover, they may distract Christians from the main message of the Bible, which is to proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ and to live according to his teachings.

However, there is still one obvious denominator that is glaring obvious in conspiracy theorists that hardly anyone mentions, the Pentecostal Charismatic Movement. Most are aligned or affiliated with Pentecostals. Think in terms of the late but not-so-great Tom Horn, a Pentecostal Pastor. I have just come across another Pentecostal conspiracy theorist on YouTube named Allen Nolan. Then of course there are the likes of you. All out to cash in on the word of God with alternative viewpoints that are hardly correct and all are dispensationalists aligned to Israel.

John Nelson Darby is recognized as the father of dispensationalism later made popular in the United States by Cyrus Scofield's Scofield Reference Bible. Charles Henry Mackintosh, 1820–1896, with his popular style spread Darby's teachings to humbler elements in society and may be regarded as the journalist of the Brethren Movement. CHM popularised Darby more than any other Brethren author. As there was no Christian teaching of a “rapture” before Darby began preaching about it in the 1830s, he is sometimes credited with originating the "secret rapture" theory wherein Christ will suddenly remove His bride, the Church, from this world before the judgments of the tribulation. 

Dispensationalist beliefs about the fate of the Jews and the re-establishment of the Kingdom of Israel put dispensationalists at the forefront of Christian Zionism, because "God is able to graft them in again," and they believe that in His grace he will do so according to their understanding of Old Testament prophecy. They believe that, while the methodologies of God may change, His purposes to bless Israel will never be forgotten, just as He has shown unmerited favour to the Church, He will do so to a remnant of Israel to fulfill all the promises made to the genetic seed of Abraham. 

I am not a dispensationalist; it is unbiblical and nor do I favour Israel. 

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCdrH550XDE

Aliens, as described in popular culture and science fiction, are often depicted as extraterrestrial beings originating from other planets or celestial bodies outside of Earth. The concept of aliens is a common theme in science fiction literature, movies, and television shows. While there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of extraterrestrial life, the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) continues to be an active area of scientific research.

It's important to note that the existence of aliens or extraterrestrial life has not been confirmed, and any claims of contact or sightings are not scientifically verified. The search for extraterrestrial life is ongoing, and scientists use various methods to explore the possibility of life beyond Earth, including studying exoplanets, analysing radio signals from space, and conducting missions to celestial bodies within our solar system, such as Mars and moons of outer planets.

In summary, the origin of aliens, if they exist, would be from other planets or celestial bodies beyond Earth.

However, is it possible that aliens are not originating from another planet, or even as some conspiracy theorists claim, from an inter-dimensional realm, but rather, are they emerging from within the earth's core, through caves and other portals from Hell? That is the theory that I am most inclined to believe the most.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-7CvBtgvGk 

There is exciting news to share with you! I have the official confirmation: This is something the whole world has been looking for over the past 70 years. It has been a long time coming but finally, someone has acted against the terrorist state of Israel and succeeded in their expectations all thanks to South Africa.

The good news is that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered its first ruling in a landmark genocide trial against Israel on 26 January 2024. The case was brought by South Africa, which accused Israel of committing genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza during its ongoing war that started on 7 October 2023. The ICJ found a prima facie case of genocide and imposed six provisional measures on Israel to prevent the commission of acts that could amount to genocide under the 1948 Genocide Convention.

These measures include:

1. Taking all measures within its power to prevent the killing of members of the Palestinian group in Gaza.

2. Ensuring that its military and other officials do not incite or encourage the commission of genocide.
   Cooperating with the United Nations and other humanitarian organizations to facilitate the delivery of aid and medical assistance to Gaza.

3. Refraining from any action that may aggravate or extend the dispute or make it more difficult to resolve.

4. Reporting to the ICJ on the steps taken to comply with these measures within one month and thereafter every three months until a final decision is rendered.

5. Respecting the ICJ's jurisdiction and complying with its orders.

The ICJ also rejected Israel's argument that it was acting in self-defence and that South Africa had no standing to bring the case. The court said that South Africa had a legal interest in ensuring the observance of the Genocide Convention, which both states are parties to, and that Israel's actions in Gaza raised serious questions of international law that required judicial scrutiny.

The ruling was welcomed by South Africa as a decisive victory, while Israel denounced it as a biased and politicized decision that ignored its right to defend itself against Hamas's attacks. The ruling is binding on both parties.

Although the word ceasefire has not been mentioned what it does mean is that if any of the war criminals carry on with the war and leave Israel they will be arrested. The king of spin himself Netanyahu called the decision a disgrace when he is the one who is a disgrace and more than that a monster.

This decision will place pressure on Netanyahu from within Israel to bring the captives home. It will also pressure the United States, the EU and the UK to reconsider supplying weapons to the terrorists. The United States has shown its hypocrisy once again by claiming that it had already proposed what has now gone into law. This is a blatant falsehood that contradicts their previous statements and actions.

One of the reasons why a ceasefire was not possible at this time was because it would have contradicted the prophecy of Daniel 9, 27. This prophecy predicted that there would be seven years of tribulation and war before the return of the Messiah. However, before happens there has to be a ceasefire allowing the Antichrist to step forth and confirm the treaty.

A ceasefire now would have interrupted this divine plan and prevented its fulfilment. Once the war is over, then we will see the Antichrist.

One of the most rewarding aspects of posting comments like this online is being able to help others achieve their goals and solve their problems. I enjoy listening to their needs, understanding their challenges, and providing them with the best possible solutions. I always strive to deliver high-quality service and exceed their expectations. It is always a pleasure to be of assistance and to see the positive impact of my efforts on their lives.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHhMOv8Xggc

Speaking in tongues is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that is often associated with certain religious practices. Here are some key points to consider:

Glossolalia: Glossolalia, or speaking in tongues, is a practice in which individuals vocalize speech-like sounds that are not easily understood. This phenomenon is often associated with certain religious or spiritual experiences.

Religious and Cultural Context: Speaking in tongues is a significant aspect of some Christian traditions, particularly within charismatic and Pentecostal communities. It is often viewed as a form of spiritual communication with a higher power. 

Allen Nolan

Diverse Perspectives: Views on speaking in tongues vary widely among religious scholars, practitioners, and skeptics. Some believe it to be a genuine spiritual gift, while others may interpret it differently.

Cultural Interpretations: In some cultures, speaking in tongues may be perceived as a genuine expression of religious fervor and connection to the divine, while in others, it may be met with skepticism or even concern.

Psychological and Anthropological Perspectives: From a psychological and anthropological standpoint, glossolalia has been studied as a cultural and linguistic phenomenon, with researchers exploring its origins, cultural significance, and potential psychological underpinnings.

Interpretation and Beliefs: Beliefs about speaking in tongues are deeply interconnected with religious, cultural, and personal interpretations. Individuals may view it as a profound spiritual experience, a learned behavior, a psychological manifestation, or something else entirely.

Speaking in tongues is not a natural or authentic phenomenon. It is usually feigned and may be a manifestation of evil within the person practicing it.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eIWNii7tVfk

It's important to note that different Christian denominations may have varying beliefs and practices regarding public and private expressions of faith, repentance, and salvation. The concept of publicly acknowledging one's faith and repentance in front of a congregation is often associated with certain denominations and traditions.

Here are some points to consider regarding this topic:

Variety of Practices: Different Christian denominations may have different practices when it comes to public displays of repentance and acceptance of Christ's plan of salvation. Some may emphasize the importance of public confession and repentance, while others may place more emphasis on private, personal expressions of faith.

Biblical Perspectives: The Bible contains various teachings on the topic of repentance and salvation. Some passages emphasise the importance of openly confessing one's faith, while others speak to the significance of personal, private prayer and repentance.

Individual Beliefs: Personal beliefs and interpretations of scripture also play a significant role in how individuals approach the act of repentance and acceptance of Christ's salvation. Some people may feel called to publicly express their faith and repentance, while others may find a more personal, private approach to be meaningful.

Church Community: The dynamics of a specific church community can also influence how individuals approach the act of repentance. Some congregations may place a strong emphasis on public displays of faith, while others may prioritize a more private and personal approach.

It's essential for individuals to seek guidance from their religious leaders and to engage in thoughtful reflection and study of scripture to discern how they should approach the act of repentance and acceptance of Christ's plan of salvation. Ultimately, the decision to publicly or privately express one's faith and repentance is a deeply personal and spiritual matter.

Being "Born Again" in a public setting is often associated with religious or spiritual experiences, particularly within the Christian faith. The idea of a public spectacle in the eyes of God and men refers to an outward demonstration of one's faith or a public declaration of spiritual transformation.

In Christian tradition, being "Born Again" is linked to a personal commitment to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, often marked by a public declaration of faith, such as through baptism or a public profession of faith in a religious gathering.

The concept of a public spectacle in the eyes of God and men reflects the desire for one's spiritual transformation to be witnessed and acknowledged by both the divine and the community. This public aspect can serve as a powerful symbol of personal renewal and a commitment to living out one's faith in a visible and tangible way.

It's important to note that interpretations of "Born Again" experiences and their public expression can vary widely across different Christian denominations and individual believers. The significance of the public aspect often depends on the specific beliefs and practices of a particular religious community.

As a general practice, Pentecostals do not engage in public displays of repentance and salvation. Instead, they prefer to do it privately while in a public setting. However, this can sometimes lead to the perception of Pentecostals as abnormal or unsaved, although these are not necessarily my views. When I was a teenager attending a Baptist Church 55 years ago, I went to the front of the church after the call was made and publicly repented and accepted Christ as my saviour.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

As a Fundamentalist Born Again Christian, I hold the Bible in high regard and consider it to be the ultimate source of guidance and truth. The belief that the Bible is the sole authoritative source of divine revelation is a fundamental tenet of many Christian denominations. Here are a few points to consider based on my statement:

Sola Scriptura**: The belief in "Sola Scriptura" (Scripture alone) is a key principle of many Protestant Christian traditions, emphasizing the Bible as the ultimate authority for faith and practice.

Interpretation**: Different Christian denominations and individuals may interpret the Bible in various ways, leading to diverse theological perspectives and doctrinal differences. This diversity can sometimes lead to disagreements about the interpretation of certain passages.

Ancillary Works**: While some Christians rely solely on the Bible for spiritual guidance, others may find value in supplementary works such as commentaries, theological writings, and historical context to aid in understanding the scriptures.

Personal Conviction**: Your belief in the sufficiency of the Bible is a personal conviction, and it's important to respectfully engage with others who may hold different perspectives on the role of extra-biblical works in understanding the scriptures.

It's important to acknowledge that Christians hold a range of views on the relationship between the Bible and other sources of spiritual insight. Ultimately, these perspectives are shaped by individual or denominational beliefs and interpretations.

It's important to approach the Bible with a discerning mind, considering various interpretations and perspectives while also comparing them to the actual text of the Bible. The Bible itself is considered by many to be the infallible word of God, and therefore, it's crucial to test any human interpretations or doctrines against the teachings and principles found within the Bible. This approach allows for a thoughtful and well-rounded understanding of the scriptures, acknowledging the potential for different interpretations while also prioritising the integrity of the biblical text.

It is also important to stick to one interpretation of the Bible without constantly searching for new verses in different versions of the Bible to support personal arguments. Some people believe in the importance of a single, consistent interpretation, I am of that school.

Others may see value in exploring different perspectives and interpretations. The use of original Hebrew or Greek texts for interpretation is also a subject of debate among scholars and religious communities. It's a valid perspective that the version of a text someone chooses to read can reflect their preference and that should be enough.

People may select a specific version based on factors such as language, cultural relevance, or personal interpretation. The decision to favour a particular version doesn't necessarily require proving one's choice by referring to the original texts to prove anything. This is especially true for literary works that have been translated multiple times, as different translations can offer unique insights and interpretations. Ultimately, the most important thing is to engage with the text in a way that resonates with the individual reader, regardless of the version they choose.

Ultimately, the approach to interpreting religious texts is deeply personal, and individuals often find meaning and guidance in different ways but going back to the original texts is not one of those ways because the translation has already been performed.

I am a King James reader (KJV): Also known as the Authorised Version, this is one of the most widely known English translations of the Bible, first published in 1611.

The New Living Translation (NLT) is a modern English translation of the Bible that aims to be both accurate and readable. The NLT is based on the most recent scholarship in the theory of translation, and the translators sought to render the message of the original texts of Scripture into contemporary English. It combines the latest biblical scholarship with a clear, dynamic writing style that aims to communicate God's Word powerfully to all readers.

While the NLT is available in numerous editions and study Bible editions, such as The Life Application Study Bible and The Life Recovery Bible, some readers may prefer to consult different versions of the Bible for various reasons. It's common for readers to refer to different versions of the NLT or other translations to gain different perspectives, compare translations, or explore different nuances of the text.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

The Bible is the inspired word of God and does not contradict itself. However, some people may misunderstand or misinterpret some passages that seem to say opposite things. To avoid this, we need to consider the context, the writer's viewpoint, the genre, the language, and the intended audience of each passage. We also need to compare Scripture with Scripture and use clear and explicit teachings to explain the implicit and unclear ones. The Bible itself warns us not to twist or distort its teachings (2 Peter 3:16). The Bible also tells us to study it carefully and correctly (2 Timothy 2:15). By doing so, we can discover the harmony and truth of God's word.

Unfortunately, that is what you are doing, and I refuse to have anything to do with whatever spirit you operate under. I will not watch you on YouTube again. However, you look as if you are doing quite well otherwise racking the money in.

A con man is an individual who deceives others by lying to them to obtain their money or property. The term "con man" is short for "confidence man" because they often gain the trust or confidence of their victims before defrauding them. Con men use a variety of techniques to manipulate people, such as pretending to be someone else, making false promises, creating fake documents, exploiting people's religious beliefs, or preying on people's emotions. Examples of con men include those who run pyramid schemes, lottery scams, romance scams, identity thefts, and even churches. Although most con men eventually get caught, they can often succeed for a time.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEmHBBeYQAI

The question of whether the Bible says there will be a third temple is not easy to answer. Different interpretations of biblical prophecies may lead to different conclusions. Some passages seem to imply that a third temple will be built in Jerusalem before the return of Jesus Christ, while others suggest that the temple is symbolic of God's people or presence.

One passage that is often cited as evidence for a third temple is Daniel 9:27, which mentions a "prince who is to come" who will make a covenant with many for one week and then put an end to sacrifice and offering in the middle of the week. Some Christians believe that this prince is the Antichrist, who will make a peace treaty with Israel and allow them to rebuild the temple, only to break the treaty and desecrate the temple after three and a half years. However, this interpretation is not universally accepted, and some scholars argue that the prince is actually a reference to Jesus or a historical figure such as Antiochus Epiphanes, who persecuted the Jews and defiled the second temple in the second century BC .

Another passage that is often used to support the idea of a third temple is 2 Thessalonians 2:4, which says that the "man of lawlessness" will exalt himself above all that is called God or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, showing himself that he is God. Some Christians interpret this as meaning that the Antichrist will claim to be God in a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem, fulfilling Daniel's prophecy. However, others point out that the Greek word for temple (naos) can also mean a shrine or a sanctuary, and that it is used metaphorically in other parts of the New Testament to refer to the church or the body of Christ (1 Corinthians 3:16-17; 6:19; Ephesians 2:21). Therefore, it is possible that the man of lawlessness will not literally sit in a physical temple, but rather oppose and deceive God's people .

A third passage that is sometimes seen as a proof for a third temple is Revelation 11:1-2, which describes John measuring the temple of God and the altar, and counting those who worship there, while leaving out the outer court which is given to the Gentiles who will trample the holy city for forty-two months. Some Christians take this as a literal description of a future temple in Jerusalem that will be partially occupied by Gentile forces during the tribulation period. However, others argue that this vision is symbolic of God's protection and judgment of His faithful witnesses, and that the temple represents His presence among them. They also note that Revelation uses imagery from Ezekiel's vision of a restored temple (Ezekiel 40-48), which many believe is not a literal blueprint for a future building, but rather a picture of God's ideal relationship with His people .

In conclusion, there is no clear consensus among Christians on whether the Bible says there will be a third temple or not. Some see it as a necessary fulfilment of prophecy before Christ's return, while others see it as irrelevant or allegorical. Ultimately, what matters most is not the physical structure of a temple, but the spiritual reality of God's dwelling with His people through His Son and His Spirit and that is the temple the Bible is referring to.

Blessings