https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKo89YIia5Y 

Interpreting natural phenomena like solar eclipses as signs or messages from a higher power is a common practice throughout history and various cultures. Here are some points to consider regarding the rare total solar eclipses in the United States:

• Frequency of Total Solar Eclipses: Total solar eclipses are not as rare as they may seem when considering the entire planet. They occur approximately every 18 months somewhere on Earth. However, the path of totality (the region where the sun is completely obscured by the moon) is relatively narrow, making it less common for a specific location to experience multiple total eclipses in a short time frame.

• Historical Significance: Eclipses have often been seen as omens or significant events in many cultures and religions throughout history. They have been interpreted as warnings, signs of change, or even divine messages.

• Scientific Explanation: From a scientific perspective, solar eclipses are predictable astronomical events caused by the alignment of the sun, moon, and Earth. While they hold great astronomical significance, they are natural phenomena with well-understood scientific explanations.

• Personal Interpretation: The interpretation of events like eclipses as signs or messages is a personal belief and can vary widely among individuals. Some may see them as spiritual messages, while others view them as purely scientific occurrences.

• Historical Context: Throughout history, people have often associated celestial events with divine intervention or messages. It is essential to consider the cultural and historical context when interpreting such events.

In conclusion, while some people may see the occurrence of two total solar eclipses passing over the United States in a short time frame as a significant sign, it is nothing of the sort. I believe that eclipses are just natural phenomena with no real meaning. The way people perceive these events ultimately depends on their individual beliefs and interpretations, which are often nothing more than wild conspiracy theories.

However, the 8th of April is significant to me because it coincides with my birth date. This is a personal significance and not based on any unsubstantiated conspiracy theories related to natural phenomena.

It's important to approach sharing one's faith with love, kindness, and respect. While some individuals may use scare tactics or fear-based messaging to try to lead others to their beliefs, a prayer of salvation and sharing the message of hope and love in a gentle and understanding way can be more effective and respectful. Each person's journey to faith is personal and unique, and it's essential to engage with others in a compassionate and caring manner, allowing them to make their own decisions based on their own beliefs and convictions. Ultimately, leading by example, showing love, compassion, and understanding, can often be more impactful than the scaremongering tactics you are using here that are not effective anyway.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDvVvR0AVuI

If you're interested in renaming the channel to better reflect its focus on teaching Jewish festival customs and beliefs, you could consider some of the following possible channel names:

• FestiveJudaism

• JewishTraditions101

• CelebrateJudaism

• FestivalsofFaith

• JudaismFestivities

• CustomsAndBeliefsChannel

Feel free to mix and match these suggestions or come up with a new name that you feel best captures the essence of what you aim to teach about Jewish festivals, customs, and beliefs. Renaming the channel can help attract viewers who are specifically interested in learning about various aspects of Judaism such as Red Heifers, and fictional temples that will never be built.

Another suggestion is that if you choose to identify as a watchman, a term often used by those who observe and interpret prophetic events described in the Bible, why not consider naming yourself "The Temple Watchman"? This thought stems from the predominant focus on topics related to the temple in your discussions, with occasional mentions of unrelated topics like UFOs over the moon. This name aligns more closely with the central theme of your content and could provide a clearer representation of the subjects you discuss.

In summary, I understand that everyone has different perspectives and values, and I do not judge or discriminate based on religious beliefs or affiliations, but if no one knows where your magical and mystical temple is to be rebuilt it will not be rebuilt. My Lord is the Lord of the Holy Christian Bible (KJV) - however, I am yet to be convinced you even are saved. I have just listened to the complete context of your latest postings and in hindsight I feel that I may have committed a sin by doing so. Your subject matter is an abomination to every Born Again Christian.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDvVvR0AVuI

There is no explicit mention of the building of a third temple in the various prophecies of the Bible, The concept of a "third temple" is often derived from interpretations and beliefs based on certain passages in the Bible, particularly in books like Ezekiel, Daniel, and Revelation.

1. Ezekiel's Vision: One of the key passages interpreted in relation to a future temple is found in the book of Ezekiel. In Ezekiel 40-48, there is a detailed description of a temple and its rituals. Some believe this vision refers to a future temple that will be built.

2. Daniel's Prophecies: In the book of Daniel, there are references to a temple and sacrifices being restored. Some interpretations see these references as pointing to a future temple that will be built.

3. Revelation: The book of Revelation also contains imagery related to temples and a new Jerusalem. Some believe these descriptions may allude to a future temple.

The concept of the rebuilding of a third temple is mainly related to Jewish views and beliefs. Here are some key points regarding this concept:

• Historical Context: The idea of a third temple stems from Jewish history, where two temples were previously built in Jerusalem. The First Temple was constructed by King Solomon and destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. The Second Temple was built after the Babylonian exile and was later destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE.

• Religious Significance: For many Jews, the rebuilding of the Third Temple is seen as a crucial event connected to the arrival of the Messiah and the era of redemption. It is believed that the Third Temple will be a place of worship and unity for the Jewish people.

• Biblical References: The concept of a future temple is mentioned in various Jewish texts, including the Hebrew Bible and prophetic writings. For example, the Book of Ezekiel contains detailed descriptions of a future temple and its rituals.

• Contemporary Views: Views on the rebuilding of the Third Temple vary among different Jewish groups. Some see it as a literal event that will occur in the future, while others interpret it symbolically as a spiritual rebuilding of the Jewish people.

• Challenges and Controversies: The idea of rebuilding the Third Temple is not without challenges and controversies. It is a sensitive topic due to its religious, political, and historical implications, particularly given the current status of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, where the previous temples stood.

Overall, the concept of the rebuilding of the Third Temple holds significant religious and cultural importance in Jewish thought and continues to be a subject of discussion and interpretation within the Jewish community but not necessarily Christianity.

However, as I am not a Jew, and neither do I practice Jewish festivals or customs, I do not abide with any Jewish traditions or beliefs. As a consequence, I do not concur with the Jewish notion of a third temple ever being built. Next posting please.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Tensions between the United States and Israel were exposed on Monday when Washington stood aside and allowed the UN Security Council to pass a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

The US decision to abstain on the vote prompted Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to cancel a scheduled trip to the US by two of his top advisers, two Israeli officials said.

The US had previously vetoed similar resolutions calling for a ceasefire. Its position evolved last week when on Friday, it put forward a ceasefire resolution tied tied to the release of hostages. That resolution fell when it was vetoed by Russia and China. The US abstention on Monday’s vote allowed the latest resolution to pass, when the other 14 members of the 15-strong council voted yes.

The US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that while the latest resolution included edits requested by the US, Washington could not vote yes because it “did not agree with everything.”

“A ceasefire could have come about months ago if Hamas had been willing to release hostages,” the ambassador said, calling on member states and the Security Council to demand that Hamas “accepts the deal on the table.”

“Any ceasefire must come with the release of all hostages,” she added

The resolution, put forward by the 10 non-permanent members of the Security Council, demands an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan, the immediate and unconditional release of hostages and “the urgent need to expand the flow” of aid into Gaza.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said a failure to implement the resolution would be “unforgivable.” “The Security Council just approved a long-awaited resolution on Gaza, demanding an immediate ceasefire, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. This resolution must be implemented. Failure would be unforgivable,” Guterres wrote on X, previously known as Twitter.

Both Hamas and the Palestinian authority welcomed the resolution, while Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan criticised the Security Council for passing a measure that called for a ceasefire “without conditioning it on the release of the hostages.”

“It undermines the efforts to secure their release,” he said at the United Nations.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said on X his country would not abide by the resolution.

“The state of Israel will not cease fire,” Katz said. “We will destroy Hamas and continue to fight until the last of the hostages returns home.”

The Biden administration made the choice to abstain rather than veto the UN Security Council resolution over the weekend when they were able to work on changing certain parts of the resolution’s text, according to a senior administration official.

Another source familiar with the matter said that the US had planned to veto, but there were intensive diplomatic efforts to find a compromise that put them in a position to abstain.

Initially the text demanded a permanent ceasefire and did not mention negotiations to release hostages, and the US was able to push for the text to change so that it referenced a lasting ceasefire and included language about the ongoing hostage release efforts, the official said. For those reasons, the US believed that the resolution was consistent with US policy, the official said, a sentiment echoed by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

“Because the final text does not have key language we view as essential, notably a condemnation of Hamas, we could not support it. This failure to condemn Hamas is particularly difficult to understand coming days after the world once again witnessed the horrific acts terrorist groups commit,” Blinken said in a statement.

The UN vote on Monday came as tensions grow over a looming Israeli military operation in Gaza’s southern city of Rafah. The US has been calling on Israel to explain how it will protect the 1.4 million Palestinians seeking refuge there ahead of the expected incursion, which the US said “would be a mistake.”

The UN Ambassador of the Palestinian Territories, Riyad Mansour, said the decision was a vote “for life to prevail.”

It has taken six months for the Security Council to demand an immediate ceasefire, and “over 100,000 killed and maimed, two million displaced, and famine for this council to immediately demand an immediate ceasefire,” Riyad said.

A US Visit Cancelled

Israel’s national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi and Ron Dermer, a member of the war cabinet and close adviser to Netanyahu, had been scheduled to travel to Washington on Monday night to discuss the offensive and US alternatives, but the visit was cancelled after the vote.

National Security spokesman John Kirby offered a fuller response to Netanyahu’s decision to cancel the delegation, saying the US was disappointed by the decision to cancel the trip.

“We’re very disappointed that they will not be coming to Washington, DC, to allow us to have a fulsome conversation with them about viable alternatives to going in on the ground in Rafah,” he said.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller called the cancellation “surprising and unfortunate.”

One US official told CNN that scrapping the visit was an overreaction that most likely reflects Netanyahu’s own domestic political concerns. Netanyahu did not communicate directly with Biden over the decision, and the President has no plans to phone Netanyahu to discuss the matter, the official said.

Separately, Israel agreed to a US proposal on a prisoner-hostage deal, according to CNN analyst Barak Ravid’s reporting on the recent round of talks in Doha. The reported deal could see the release of around 700 Palestinian prisoners, among them 100 serving life sentences for killing Israeli nationals, in exchange for the release of 40 Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. However, Hamas said more issues remain unresolved beyond the release of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Hamas senior officials Basem Naeim told CNN that “Israeli-American media” was adding pressure on the talks.

“For us, the negotiations are not only centric around the prisoner exchange deal,” he said.

“Israel has not agreed to any of (Hamas) requests related to a complete ceasefire, the withdrawal of all forces from the Gaza Strip, even in stages, and the return of all displaced people to their homes,” Naeim said.

As this resolution has now into international law, what will follow from Netanyahu will be interesting to observe. Given that the United States abstained from the vote, will they now cease supplying weapons to Israel, thus preventing Israel from inflicting further acts of genocide against Palestinians? Furthermore, the failure of Israel to comply will leave the Jews isolated and alone on the world stage and place them in the same position as the Jews of Europe at the time of the Holocaust.

To prevent any further irreparable damage to both Israel and (more importantly) Gaza, it is imperative to engage in constructive dialogue and seek peaceful resolutions, which is something the pig-headed Netanyahu refuses to participate in. It is clear that this man is a mass murderer and will go it alone, irrespective of any UN resolutions—all to Israel's inevitable detriment.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcXzvBnKDhM 

In many translations of the Bible, the term "force" may not be explicitly used to explain the Mark of the Beast, but it is often replaced by the word "causeth." This is based on the original Greek text of the New Testament, particularly in the Book of Revelation, where the Mark of the Beast is mentioned.

The specific reference to "causeth" about the Mark of the Beast can be found in Revelation 13:16-17 in the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible. It states: "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

While the word "force" may not be explicitly used in this context, the concept of coercion or compulsion to receive the mark is implied in the use of "causeth." This signifies that those who do not receive the mark may face severe restrictions, such as being unable to participate in economic activities.

The decision to refuse to take a mark, often associated with concepts like the Mark of the Beast in some religious beliefs, can indeed create significant challenges and pressures for individuals who hold such convictions. Here are some potential impacts:

Financial Exclusion: Refusing to take the mark, if it is associated with a financial or identification system, could lead to exclusion from certain financial services, transactions, and possibly even employment opportunities. This can create financial strain and limited access to essential resources.

Social Isolation: In a world where the mark is widely adopted for various purposes, individuals who refuse it may face social and professional isolation, as they may be unable to participate in certain activities or access certain spaces.

Legal and Administrative Hurdles: Depending on the legal and administrative frameworks in place, individuals refusing the mark may encounter challenges related to identification, travel, and participation in governmental or commercial activities.

Ethical and Religious Considerations: For many individuals, refusing the mark may be rooted in deeply held ethical, religious, or philosophical beliefs. The pressure to compromise these convictions can lead to internal conflict and emotional distress.

However, once the Mark of the Beast is made compulsory the only way to avoid it and the consequent Hellfire is to be Born Again by reciting the prayer of repentance contained at the head of this blog spot. This concept indeed comes from the New Testament, specifically from the teachings of Jesus in the Gospel of John. Being "Born Again" refers to a spiritual rebirth or conversion experience, where an individual undergoes a profound transformation in their beliefs and life. It's often associated with a personal commitment to Jesus Christ and a renewed way of living by Christian teachings.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA-wEeowqu0

It is doubtful Kate, the Princess of Wales, has cancer. After watching her announcement video where she made her false claims, I can tell she is lying to take the heat off herself over the faked photograph of herself and the children. If she does something like that, then she is not averse to twisting the truth in more ways than one. After seeing the sympathy Charles has attracted over his cancer claim, she decided it would be a good ploy to try and claim cancer herself. She is simply taking a break or holiday to recuperate after her recent operation. I saw her recently dancing with Charles and laughing over the whole matter. They have to protect the family business.

Blessings

Chairman of the Chinese Communist Party Xi Jinping

 

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The Chinese economy has totally collapsed. The consequences of the total collapse of the Chinese economy are significant. Here are some potential outcomes:

1. Global Economic Impact: China is the world's second-largest economy, and the collapse of its economy will have a contagion effect on the global economy. It will lead to a decline in international trade, disruption of global supply chains, and financial market instability.

2. Unemployment and Social Unrest: The collapse of the Chinese economy will result in a surge in unemployment as businesses shut down and foreign investments decline. This will lead to social unrest and political instability within China. (already happening)

3. Global Debt Crisis: China has a significant amount of debt, both domestically and internationally. The collapse of the Chinese economy will trigger a global debt crisis, as creditors may face difficulties in recovering their loans.

4. Geopolitical Shifts: China's economic collapse will lead to a shift in the global balance of power. It may weaken China's influence on the international stage and create opportunities for other countries to fill the void.

5. Impact on Global Supply Chains: China is known as the "world's factory" due to its extensive manufacturing capabilities. A collapse of the Chinese economy has to disrupt global supply chains, affecting industries and businesses worldwide.

6. This doom and gloom will lead to a depression that will make the Great Depression of 1929 look like a hiccup in comparison. A Greater Depression, or money crash, where cash will wiped out or cancelled overnight, leading to the Mark of the Beast—and the arrival of the Antichrist. Hold tight to any savings because no one can rely on governments when times of extreme economic duress hit the global economy.

7. Xi Jinping is not reacting at all to the crisis with his non-action spelling the end of the CCP in China. With the US economy faltering and failing due to Biden's policies, this will lead to a third way, neither communism nor capitalism, the new global order of the Antichrist.

If you doubt the validity of my claims, check out the various YouTube channels dedicated to this subject. This is not sensationalism or scaremongering. It is real and it is happening now.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA-wEeowqu0

This is not a prophecy update. However, it's still concerning to see how many people believe false information such as this without verifying its accuracy. The number of comments on this post shows how easily people can be misled by speculation on the internet. It's crucial to be cautious when consuming information online and to fact-check all sources to ensure they are reliable. It's also important to be aware of the potential for misinformation and disinformation on the internet and to be mindful of this when reading any content online.

That's why it's crucial to be cautious and fact-check all sources before believing or sharing any information. Here are some key points to keep in mind:

• Always verify the accuracy of information before accepting it as true.

• Be aware that speculation on the internet can often be misleading, so it's important to approach it with skepticism.
  

• Fact-checking is essential to ensure the reliability of the information you come across online.

• Misinformation and disinformation are prevalent on the internet, so it's crucial to be mindful of this and critically evaluate the content you consume.

• Rely on multiple sources and cross-reference information to get a more accurate understanding of a topic.

Remember, while most of the Internet aims to provide accurate information, it has limitations and should not be solely relied upon. It's always a good practice to double-check the information provided with other more reliable sources other than this bullshit.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA-wEeowqu0

Republican lawmakers in three swing states have indeed announced their plan to remove President Joe Biden from their state ballots. This action is being taken after Donald Trump was banned from the Colorado ballot, and some Republicans want the same for Biden. The states involved in this plan include Pennsylvania, Georgia, and Arizona. However, there has been no official announcement from Republican lawmakers in any state to remove President Joe Biden from the ballot. Additionally, it is not appropriate to use political affiliations or parties to determine eligibility for ballot access. All candidates, regardless of their political beliefs, should be treated equally and with respect.

There is no credible information suggesting that Joe Biden will be replaced as the Democratic presidential candidate in 2024. President Biden has formally clinched a second straight Democratic nomination and is the party's presumptive nominee for the upcoming election. The Democratic Party is united in supporting President Biden, and there is no mechanism for the party to choose a different nominee at this point. Looking to August to suggest anything contrary is speculative and should not be considered.

As long as President Joe Biden is in the race, it's highly unlikely that the Democratic Party would actively seek to replace him. Here are some key points to consider regarding this topic:

Democratic Party Dynamics:

• President Biden was democratically elected as the party's candidate and subsequently as the President of the United States.

• The party typically supports its incumbent president for re-election unless extraordinary circumstances arise.

Challenges of Replacing an Incumbent President:

• Replacing an incumbent president within the same party is a complex and highly unusual process.

• It would require significant internal party support and a compelling reason, such as a serious health issue or a major political scandal.

President Biden's Position:

• President Biden has indicated his intention to run for re-election in 2024, and there have been no public indications from him or the party leadership to suggest otherwise.

• As long as President Biden remains committed to seeking re-election, the party is likely to support his candidacy.

Potential Scenarios:

• If President Biden were to voluntarily withdraw from the race or face insurmountable challenges, the party would then consider alternative candidates.

• In such a scenario, the Democratic Party would likely engage in a process to select a new nominee, which could involve primaries and party conventions.

In summary, while the hypothetical possibility of replacing a sitting president exists, as long as President Biden remains in the race and is supported by the Democratic Party, the likelihood of a replacement is extremely low.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SA-wEeowqu0

Please understand the sensitivity and significance of religious and cultural names. What I mean is you have called Jesus the Christ and then called him Yeshua in the same breath. The use of different names for Jesus, such as "Jesus" and "Yeshua," reflects linguistic and cultural variations. Different names are used in varying religious and cultural contexts and can be a matter of tradition, language, and historical interpretation.

Recognize that "Jesus" is the anglicized form of the name, while "Yeshua" is the Hebrew/Aramaic equivalent. Both names refer to the same historical and religious figure, central to Christianity. Different names and their use do not imply two separate figures but reflect the diversity of languages and cultures in which the figure of Jesus is revered.

In the Christian tradition, Jesus Christ is referred to by various names and titles, including "Lord Jesus Christ." That name reflects the rich and diverse theological and cultural traditions within Christianity.

It's essential to approach these matters with respect and understanding. Different traditions and communities may use different names while referring to the same figure. The diversity of names used to refer to Jesus reflects the global and multicultural nature of the Christian faith and its historical development.

Many people are fooled by what you teach here as Christianity because you refer to the Bible, but what version? When you use the name for the Son of God as Jesus and then call him Yeshua at the same time, you give yourself away as not being a Christian but a Jew heavily into futurism and outright speculation.

Blessings