https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The reported increase in abdominal cancers in young people under 45 is indeed concerning. Here are some key points to consider regarding this trend:

• Global Trend: The rise in cancer rates among young individuals is not limited to a specific region but is being observed worldwide.

• Focus on Abdominal Cancers: The specific focus on abdominal cancers indicates a particular concern for malignancies affecting organs in the abdominal region, such as the stomach, liver, pancreas, and intestines.

• Influence of Public Figures: Mentioning Kate Middleton's recent diagnosis brings attention to the potential impact of public figures sharing their health challenges in raising awareness about specific health issues.

• Importance of Early Detection: Detecting cancer at an early stage is crucial for successful treatment outcomes. Young individuals need to be proactive about their health, attend regular check-ups, and consult healthcare professionals if they notice any concerning symptoms.

• Risk Factors: Understanding the risk factors associated with different types of cancer, including lifestyle choices, environmental factors, genetic predispositions, and family history, is important for both prevention and early detection.

• Encouraging Healthy Lifestyles: Promoting healthy lifestyle choices, such as maintaining a balanced diet, engaging in regular physical activity, avoiding tobacco and excessive alcohol consumption, and managing stress, can help reduce the risk of developing cancer.

Healthcare systems, policymakers, and the public need to work together to address this concerning trend and implement strategies to promote cancer awareness, early detection, and access to quality care for all individuals, especially young people. Healthcare systems, policymakers, and the public must collaborate in addressing the concerning trend of cancer and implementing strategies to promote awareness, early detection, and access to quality care, particularly for young individuals.

 However, there is no scientific evidence linking COVID-19 vaccinations to an increased risk of cancer among young people. COVID-19 vaccines have undergone thorough testing and monitoring to ensure their safety and efficacy in preventing COVID-19.

Fact is, it is doubtful Kate, the Princess of Wales, has or ever has had cancer. After watching her announcement video where she made her false claims, I can tell she is lying to take the heat off herself over the faked photograph of herself and the children. If she does something like that, then she is not averse to twisting the truth in more ways than one. After seeing the sympathy Charles has attracted over his cancer claim, she decided it would be a good ploy to try and claim cancer herself. She is simply taking a break or holiday to recuperate after her recent operation. I saw her recently dancing with Charles and laughing over the whole matter. They have to protect the family business.

Rather than sick, she looks like someone who is very healthy with no sign whatsoever of her ever having undergone chemotherapy. Kate appears to be in robust health, showing no traces of her past chemotherapy treatment. She exudes vitality and well-being, belying any history of chemotherapy. Her vibrant appearance belies any experience with chemotherapy. She radiates good health, masking any remnants of her chemotherapy journey if she has not had chemotherapy in the first instance.

It's important to be cautious about believing or spreading such unfounded claims without reliable sources to support them. As a public figure, Kate Middleton may have given false information about her health or personal life that could be harmful to the status of the Royal Family. I would like these claims to be verified by reputable sources before accepting them as true.

We need to verify information from credible sources before believing or spreading claims about someone's health, especially when it concerns public figures like Kate Middleton, the 

Here is some important information regarding the claims about Kate Middleton and cancer:

• No credible evidence: There is currently no credible information or evidence to suggest that Kate Middleton has cancer. It is crucial to rely on reliable sources when making serious claims that could impact someone's reputation.

• Doubtful claims: Sensational claims should be approached with scepticism, especially when they lack credible backing. It is important to be cautious about accepting information as true without verifiable proof.

• False claims: Spreading false information about a serious illness like cancer can be very harmful. Kate Middleton should avoid spreading unsubstantiated rumours that could negatively impact others.

• Hair loss: Chemotherapy, a common cancer treatment, often causes hair loss. Observing physical signs like hair loss can sometimes indicate whether someone is undergoing cancer treatment. However, not all cancer treatments result in hair loss while she still looks very healthy.

• Public figures: Public figures like members of the Royal Family are often under intense media scrutiny. It is important to handle information about their health or personal lives with care and rely on verified sources for accurate information.

It is crucial to exercise caution when considering unverified claims. Due to the strict security and secrecy surrounding the Royal Family, obtaining information from reliable sources has proven difficult. As a result, it is impossible to verify the accuracy of the claims made by this individual. The world has accepted her statements as true based solely on her word.

It is also possible for someone who appears healthy and doesn't show any visible signs of sickness is undergo chemotherapy and they may not suffer hair loss. Here are some possible explanations for this scenario:

• Wig: Kate may be wearing a very realistic wig that mimics natural hair, which can make it difficult to tell if they have lost their hair due to chemotherapy.

• Cold Cap Therapy: Some cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy use cold cap therapy to reduce the chances of losing their hair. This treatment involves wearing a special cap filled with a cold gel to reduce blood flow to the scalp during chemotherapy, which can help minimise hair loss.

• Different Types of Chemotherapy: Not all chemotherapy drugs cause hair loss. Depending on the specific treatment regimen the person is receiving, they may not experience significant hair loss.

• Early Stage Treatment: If the person is in the early stages of their chemotherapy treatment, hair loss may not have occurred yet. Hair loss usually begins a few weeks after starting chemotherapy.

• Hair Regrowth: Some people experience hair regrowth during their chemotherapy treatment, which can make it appear as though they have not lost their hair.

It's important to remember that each person's experience with chemotherapy is unique, and not everyone will lose their hair as a side effect. Additionally, advancements in cancer treatment have led to different ways to manage side effects like hair loss.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKo89YIia5Y

As of now, Joe Biden has been in office for about three and a half years as the President of the United States. Here are some key points to consider when evaluating his tenure:

• COVID-19 Response:

  • Biden's administration has focused on ramping up vaccination efforts and rolling out economic relief packages to help Americans and businesses affected by the pandemic.

  • The administration set a goal to administer 100 million vaccine doses within the first 100 days in office, which was later increased to 200 million doses.

• Economic Policies:

  • Biden signed a $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package known as the American Rescue Plan, which included direct payments to Americans, extended unemployment benefits, and funding for vaccine distribution.

  • The administration has also proposed a $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan aimed at creating jobs and improving the country's infrastructure.

• Climate Change:

  • Biden rejoined the Paris Climate Agreement on his first day in office, signaling a commitment to addressing climate change.

  • The administration has set ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and promote clean energy initiatives.

• Foreign Policy:

  • Biden has emphasized rebuilding alliances with traditional U.S. allies and taking a multilateral approach to international relations.

  • The administration has taken a tougher stance on Russia and China while reengaging with international organizations like the WHO and the UN.

• Social Issues:

  • Biden has signed executive orders to promote racial equity, LGBTQ rights, and immigration reform.

  • The administration has also focused on police reform and gun control measures.

It is important to acknowledge that opinions on President Biden's performance vary depending on individual perspectives and political affiliations. As the 2024 election approaches, voters will have the opportunity to evaluate his presidency and decide on the future direction of the country.

Regardless of how one looks at Joe Biden's presidency, his performance has been remarkable, and he deserves congratulations for his considerable achievements so far. Some of his accomplishments are mentioned above, but there are other areas where he has done excellent work as well.

Infrastructure:
He has pushed for a large infrastructure bill aimed at creating jobs and improving the country's infrastructure.

Diplomacy:
He has worked on rebuilding relationships with allies and engaging in diplomacy on various global issues.
Social Issues: He has advocated for police reform and racial justice initiatives and has signed executive orders to promote equity and inclusion.

While opinions on political leaders vary, often due to their respective political views, it is essential to recognize the efforts and accomplishments that Biden has made during his time in office so far, which have been excellent.

It's important to focus discussions around political figures on their policies, actions, and impact, rather than resorting to personal attacks or extreme language. Political debates should be conducted respectfully, with a focus on facts and reasoned arguments. While it's valid to have concerns about the potential consequences of a certain individual becoming president again, it's crucial to express these concerns constructively and civilly. All individuals have the right to support or oppose political figures, but it's essential to do so in a way that promotes healthy dialogue and understanding.

However, in the case of Trump, it's imperative to note that everything must be done to prevent him from becoming the president again. Even if Biden has been the best president the United States has had for decades, foul or crooked means can and must be adopted to stop Trump if necessary. This is because the outcome for the United States and the rest of the world will be disastrous if he becomes the president again—it could even be earth-shattering for the entire globe.

Blessings

 https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

“I find it highly interesting that Steve Jackson was invaded by the Secret Service at the time he was about ready to publish this game; he had to sue them to be able to publish it. Once you see the almost "prophetic" nature of this game, you will see why the government tried to prevent it from being created and distributed to the general public”. End Of Quote.

The information the Cutting Edge Ministries about the Steve Jackson Card Games is related to conspiracy theories surrounding the Illuminati and their alleged plans for population control through epidemics. It's important to approach such claims with a critical mindset and consider reliable sources of information.

Regarding the "Illuminati -- New World Order -- INWO Game" distributed in 1995, here are some key points to consider:

• The game was created by Steve Jackson Games, known for their complex and satirical card games.

• The game revolves around the concept of secret societies and players attempting to take over the world using various strategies.

• The cards you mentioned, "Population Reduction", "Center For Disease Control", and "Epidemic", are part of the game's mechanics and themes, not necessarily indicative of real-world events or intentions.

It's essential to distinguish between fictional games or stories and actual events or plans. While some conspiracy theories may draw connections between fictional works and real-life occurrences, it's crucial to verify information from credible sources before drawing conclusions.

Steve Jackson card games, such as "Munchkin" and "Illuminati," are works of total fiction with no direct correlation to real-life events. These games are designed for entertainment purposes, often featuring fantasy themes, humorous elements, and creative story-lines.

Players immerse themselves in these fictional worlds, engaging in battles, quests, and strategic game play that are purely imaginary and do not reflect actual historical or current events. The primary goal of these card games is to provide players with a fun and engaging experience in a fantastical setting without any connections to real life.

Furthermore, Bill Gates and Al Gore are not trying to kill people with vaccinations. Both Bill Gates, co-founder of Microsoft, and Al Gore, former Vice President of the United States, have been involved in philanthropic efforts and public health initiatives. Bill Gates, through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, has focused on global health issues, including vaccination programs to help prevent diseases and improve public health around the world. Al Gore has been an advocate for environmental issues and climate change awareness.

Vaccinations are a critical tool in public health to prevent the spread of infectious diseases and have been instrumental in reducing the burden of many illnesses worldwide. It is essential to rely on credible sources and scientific evidence when discussing vaccination and public health initiatives. Misinformation about vaccines can be harmful and undermine efforts to protect public health. It is critical to verify information from reputable sources and experts in the field of public health when discussing these topics and not take as fact conspiracy theories of the kind perpetrated by Cutting Edge Ministries.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

In response to the collapse of the Baltimore Bridge and the pledge made by U.S. President Joe Biden to rebuild the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, here are some key points to summarize the situation:

• Incident:

  • A massive freight ship collided with the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, causing a section of the bridge to collapse into the Patapsco River.

  • This incident resulted in cars and people falling into the river, prompting a rescue operation to save those affected.

• President's Pledge:

  • President Joe Biden stated that the federal government would cover the entire cost of reconstructing the bridge.

  • He emphasized the importance of swift action and indicated that Congress's support would be crucial for this effort.

• Rescue Operation:

  • Two survivors were rescued from the river, with one hospitalized for treatment.

  • Rescue teams continued to search for more individuals who may have been impacted by the bridge collapse.

• Bridge Importance:

  • The Francis Scott Key Bridge served as a vital link for drivers traveling between New York and Washington, providing an alternative route that bypassed downtown Baltimore.

  • It was a key part of the transportation infrastructure, with a significant traffic volume of 31,000 cars per day or 11.3 million vehicles annually.

• Government Response:

  • President Biden expressed empathy for those affected by the incident and assured that the search and rescue operation was the top priority.

  • Despite potential liability issues with the ship and its operator, Biden emphasized the immediate need to rebuild the bridge and reopen it for public use.

  • While infrastructure projects are typically funded by a mix of state and federal resources, the federal government will take the lead in financing the reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge.

• Future Plans:

  • President Biden mentioned his intention to visit Baltimore promptly to assess the situation firsthand, although the exact timing of his visit was not specified.

This tragic event underscores the importance of infrastructure safety and the swift response required to address such emergencies for the well-being of the affected communities. So well done to Joe Biden. May he live a long time and be reelected again at the end of 2024. That other option only spells disaster, not only for the United States but for the entire world.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Cutting Edge Ministries reported on Tuesday that independent journalist Lara Logan has claimed that multiple intelligence sources informed her that the Baltimore bridge collapse was a "brilliant strategic attack" on critical U.S. infrastructure, most likely through cyber means.

The statement provided by Cutting Edge suggests that the Baltimore bridge collapse was an intentional and strategically planned attack on critical infrastructure, potentially carried out through cyber means. This claim raises serious concerns about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure to cyber attacks and the potential impact on the national security of the USA. It underscores the importance of strengthening Cybersecurity measures to protect essential systems and infrastructure from such threats.

However, it is important to note that the credibility and reliability of the sources that made these claims should be verified. Without official confirmation or statements from relevant authorities or sources, such claims should be treated with caution as they can be based on speculation or misinformation.

Investigations are conducted by authorities to determine the cause of incidents like the bridge collapse, including whether it was due to a Cyber-attack or other factors. It is best to wait for official investigations to conclude before making any conclusions or speculations.

In cases like this, it is crucial to prioritisation facts over speculation. Patience and reliance on official reports can help in understanding the root causes and prevent the spread of misinformation.

Blessings

 https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

It is indeed a tragic event when accidents like the one involving the Singaporean-owned cargo ship hitting a pylon on the Baltimore Bridge occur, resulting in the loss of several lives. Here are some key points based on the provided information:

• The accident involving the cargo ship hitting a pylon on the Baltimore Bridge was a tragic event that led to loss of lives.

• It is crucial to exercise caution when discussing such incidents and wait for official investigations to determine the cause rather than speculating.

• It is important to rely only on credible sources for accurate information and avoid jumping to conclusions regarding the event.

• There is no apparent reason to believe that this accident was a deliberate act of war; dismissing such theories is essential.

• Our thoughts and prayers go out to the families and loved ones of the victims during this difficult time.

• Respecting the privacy of the affected families and allowing them space to grieve is crucial.

• The cause of the accident is currently under investigation, and it is advised to avoid speculation until the investigations are concluded.

• It is recommended to rely on credible sources for accurate information rather than sources that propagate conspiracy theories.

In times of tragedy, it is important to come together to support those affected and show empathy towards the victims and their families.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKo89YIia5Y 

Interpreting natural phenomena like solar eclipses as signs or messages from a higher power is a common practice throughout history and various cultures. Here are some points to consider regarding the rare total solar eclipses in the United States:

• Frequency of Total Solar Eclipses: Total solar eclipses are not as rare as they may seem when considering the entire planet. They occur approximately every 18 months somewhere on Earth. However, the path of totality (the region where the sun is completely obscured by the moon) is relatively narrow, making it less common for a specific location to experience multiple total eclipses in a short time frame.

• Historical Significance: Eclipses have often been seen as omens or significant events in many cultures and religions throughout history. They have been interpreted as warnings, signs of change, or even divine messages.

• Scientific Explanation: From a scientific perspective, solar eclipses are predictable astronomical events caused by the alignment of the sun, moon, and Earth. While they hold great astronomical significance, they are natural phenomena with well-understood scientific explanations.

• Personal Interpretation: The interpretation of events like eclipses as signs or messages is a personal belief and can vary widely among individuals. Some may see them as spiritual messages, while others view them as purely scientific occurrences.

• Historical Context: Throughout history, people have often associated celestial events with divine intervention or messages. It is essential to consider the cultural and historical context when interpreting such events.

In conclusion, while some people may see the occurrence of two total solar eclipses passing over the United States in a short time frame as a significant sign, it is nothing of the sort. I believe that eclipses are just natural phenomena with no real meaning. The way people perceive these events ultimately depends on their individual beliefs and interpretations, which are often nothing more than wild conspiracy theories.

However, the 8th of April is significant to me because it coincides with my birth date. This is a personal significance and not based on any unsubstantiated conspiracy theories related to natural phenomena.

It's important to approach sharing one's faith with love, kindness, and respect. While some individuals may use scare tactics or fear-based messaging to try to lead others to their beliefs, a prayer of salvation and sharing the message of hope and love in a gentle and understanding way can be more effective and respectful. Each person's journey to faith is personal and unique, and it's essential to engage with others in a compassionate and caring manner, allowing them to make their own decisions based on their own beliefs and convictions. Ultimately, leading by example, showing love, compassion, and understanding, can often be more impactful than the scaremongering tactics you are using here that are not effective anyway.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDvVvR0AVuI

If you're interested in renaming the channel to better reflect its focus on teaching Jewish festival customs and beliefs, you could consider some of the following possible channel names:

• FestiveJudaism

• JewishTraditions101

• CelebrateJudaism

• FestivalsofFaith

• JudaismFestivities

• CustomsAndBeliefsChannel

Feel free to mix and match these suggestions or come up with a new name that you feel best captures the essence of what you aim to teach about Jewish festivals, customs, and beliefs. Renaming the channel can help attract viewers who are specifically interested in learning about various aspects of Judaism such as Red Heifers, and fictional temples that will never be built.

Another suggestion is that if you choose to identify as a watchman, a term often used by those who observe and interpret prophetic events described in the Bible, why not consider naming yourself "The Temple Watchman"? This thought stems from the predominant focus on topics related to the temple in your discussions, with occasional mentions of unrelated topics like UFOs over the moon. This name aligns more closely with the central theme of your content and could provide a clearer representation of the subjects you discuss.

In summary, I understand that everyone has different perspectives and values, and I do not judge or discriminate based on religious beliefs or affiliations, but if no one knows where your magical and mystical temple is to be rebuilt it will not be rebuilt. My Lord is the Lord of the Holy Christian Bible (KJV) - however, I am yet to be convinced you even are saved. I have just listened to the complete context of your latest postings and in hindsight I feel that I may have committed a sin by doing so. Your subject matter is an abomination to every Born Again Christian.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDvVvR0AVuI

There is no explicit mention of the building of a third temple in the various prophecies of the Bible, The concept of a "third temple" is often derived from interpretations and beliefs based on certain passages in the Bible, particularly in books like Ezekiel, Daniel, and Revelation.

1. Ezekiel's Vision: One of the key passages interpreted in relation to a future temple is found in the book of Ezekiel. In Ezekiel 40-48, there is a detailed description of a temple and its rituals. Some believe this vision refers to a future temple that will be built.

2. Daniel's Prophecies: In the book of Daniel, there are references to a temple and sacrifices being restored. Some interpretations see these references as pointing to a future temple that will be built.

3. Revelation: The book of Revelation also contains imagery related to temples and a new Jerusalem. Some believe these descriptions may allude to a future temple.

The concept of the rebuilding of a third temple is mainly related to Jewish views and beliefs. Here are some key points regarding this concept:

• Historical Context: The idea of a third temple stems from Jewish history, where two temples were previously built in Jerusalem. The First Temple was constructed by King Solomon and destroyed by the Babylonians in 586 BCE. The Second Temple was built after the Babylonian exile and was later destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE.

• Religious Significance: For many Jews, the rebuilding of the Third Temple is seen as a crucial event connected to the arrival of the Messiah and the era of redemption. It is believed that the Third Temple will be a place of worship and unity for the Jewish people.

• Biblical References: The concept of a future temple is mentioned in various Jewish texts, including the Hebrew Bible and prophetic writings. For example, the Book of Ezekiel contains detailed descriptions of a future temple and its rituals.

• Contemporary Views: Views on the rebuilding of the Third Temple vary among different Jewish groups. Some see it as a literal event that will occur in the future, while others interpret it symbolically as a spiritual rebuilding of the Jewish people.

• Challenges and Controversies: The idea of rebuilding the Third Temple is not without challenges and controversies. It is a sensitive topic due to its religious, political, and historical implications, particularly given the current status of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, where the previous temples stood.

Overall, the concept of the rebuilding of the Third Temple holds significant religious and cultural importance in Jewish thought and continues to be a subject of discussion and interpretation within the Jewish community but not necessarily Christianity.

However, as I am not a Jew, and neither do I practice Jewish festivals or customs, I do not abide with any Jewish traditions or beliefs. As a consequence, I do not concur with the Jewish notion of a third temple ever being built. Next posting please.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Tensions between the United States and Israel were exposed on Monday when Washington stood aside and allowed the UN Security Council to pass a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

The US decision to abstain on the vote prompted Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to cancel a scheduled trip to the US by two of his top advisers, two Israeli officials said.

The US had previously vetoed similar resolutions calling for a ceasefire. Its position evolved last week when on Friday, it put forward a ceasefire resolution tied tied to the release of hostages. That resolution fell when it was vetoed by Russia and China. The US abstention on Monday’s vote allowed the latest resolution to pass, when the other 14 members of the 15-strong council voted yes.

The US Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield said that while the latest resolution included edits requested by the US, Washington could not vote yes because it “did not agree with everything.”

“A ceasefire could have come about months ago if Hamas had been willing to release hostages,” the ambassador said, calling on member states and the Security Council to demand that Hamas “accepts the deal on the table.”

“Any ceasefire must come with the release of all hostages,” she added

The resolution, put forward by the 10 non-permanent members of the Security Council, demands an immediate ceasefire for the month of Ramadan, the immediate and unconditional release of hostages and “the urgent need to expand the flow” of aid into Gaza.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres said a failure to implement the resolution would be “unforgivable.” “The Security Council just approved a long-awaited resolution on Gaza, demanding an immediate ceasefire, and the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages. This resolution must be implemented. Failure would be unforgivable,” Guterres wrote on X, previously known as Twitter.

Both Hamas and the Palestinian authority welcomed the resolution, while Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations Gilad Erdan criticised the Security Council for passing a measure that called for a ceasefire “without conditioning it on the release of the hostages.”

“It undermines the efforts to secure their release,” he said at the United Nations.

Israeli Foreign Minister Israel Katz said on X his country would not abide by the resolution.

“The state of Israel will not cease fire,” Katz said. “We will destroy Hamas and continue to fight until the last of the hostages returns home.”

The Biden administration made the choice to abstain rather than veto the UN Security Council resolution over the weekend when they were able to work on changing certain parts of the resolution’s text, according to a senior administration official.

Another source familiar with the matter said that the US had planned to veto, but there were intensive diplomatic efforts to find a compromise that put them in a position to abstain.

Initially the text demanded a permanent ceasefire and did not mention negotiations to release hostages, and the US was able to push for the text to change so that it referenced a lasting ceasefire and included language about the ongoing hostage release efforts, the official said. For those reasons, the US believed that the resolution was consistent with US policy, the official said, a sentiment echoed by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

“Because the final text does not have key language we view as essential, notably a condemnation of Hamas, we could not support it. This failure to condemn Hamas is particularly difficult to understand coming days after the world once again witnessed the horrific acts terrorist groups commit,” Blinken said in a statement.

The UN vote on Monday came as tensions grow over a looming Israeli military operation in Gaza’s southern city of Rafah. The US has been calling on Israel to explain how it will protect the 1.4 million Palestinians seeking refuge there ahead of the expected incursion, which the US said “would be a mistake.”

The UN Ambassador of the Palestinian Territories, Riyad Mansour, said the decision was a vote “for life to prevail.”

It has taken six months for the Security Council to demand an immediate ceasefire, and “over 100,000 killed and maimed, two million displaced, and famine for this council to immediately demand an immediate ceasefire,” Riyad said.

A US Visit Cancelled

Israel’s national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi and Ron Dermer, a member of the war cabinet and close adviser to Netanyahu, had been scheduled to travel to Washington on Monday night to discuss the offensive and US alternatives, but the visit was cancelled after the vote.

National Security spokesman John Kirby offered a fuller response to Netanyahu’s decision to cancel the delegation, saying the US was disappointed by the decision to cancel the trip.

“We’re very disappointed that they will not be coming to Washington, DC, to allow us to have a fulsome conversation with them about viable alternatives to going in on the ground in Rafah,” he said.

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller called the cancellation “surprising and unfortunate.”

One US official told CNN that scrapping the visit was an overreaction that most likely reflects Netanyahu’s own domestic political concerns. Netanyahu did not communicate directly with Biden over the decision, and the President has no plans to phone Netanyahu to discuss the matter, the official said.

Separately, Israel agreed to a US proposal on a prisoner-hostage deal, according to CNN analyst Barak Ravid’s reporting on the recent round of talks in Doha. The reported deal could see the release of around 700 Palestinian prisoners, among them 100 serving life sentences for killing Israeli nationals, in exchange for the release of 40 Israeli hostages held by Hamas in Gaza. However, Hamas said more issues remain unresolved beyond the release of Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails. Hamas senior officials Basem Naeim told CNN that “Israeli-American media” was adding pressure on the talks.

“For us, the negotiations are not only centric around the prisoner exchange deal,” he said.

“Israel has not agreed to any of (Hamas) requests related to a complete ceasefire, the withdrawal of all forces from the Gaza Strip, even in stages, and the return of all displaced people to their homes,” Naeim said.

As this resolution has now into international law, what will follow from Netanyahu will be interesting to observe. Given that the United States abstained from the vote, will they now cease supplying weapons to Israel, thus preventing Israel from inflicting further acts of genocide against Palestinians? Furthermore, the failure of Israel to comply will leave the Jews isolated and alone on the world stage and place them in the same position as the Jews of Europe at the time of the Holocaust.

To prevent any further irreparable damage to both Israel and (more importantly) Gaza, it is imperative to engage in constructive dialogue and seek peaceful resolutions, which is something the pig-headed Netanyahu refuses to participate in. It is clear that this man is a mass murderer and will go it alone, irrespective of any UN resolutions—all to Israel's inevitable detriment.

Blessings