https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kCElgUuYcg

The image of the cross without Christ known as the crucifix, is a symbol deeply associated with Christianity and the concept of redemption. Here's how it relates to the idea of God's plan of redemption:

Symbolism of the Cross: The crucifix is a powerful symbol in Christianity representing the sacrifice of Jesus Christ on the cross for the redemption of humanity's sins. It serves as a reminder of Jesus' suffering, death, and resurrection, central to Christian belief in salvation. God's Plan of Redemption: According to Christian theology, God's plan of redemption involves sending Jesus Christ, His Son, to earth to offer Himself as a sacrifice for the sins of humanity. The crucifixion is seen as the culmination of this plan, where Jesus' death on the cross is believed to atone for the sins of believers. Redemption through Sacrifice: The crucifixion is viewed as the ultimate act of love and sacrifice by God, demonstrating His mercy and forgiveness towards humanity. Through Jesus' death and resurrection, Christians believe they can be reconciled with God and receive salvation. Depiction in Art: Images of the cross have been a common theme in Christian art for centuries, serving as a visual representation of the central event in Christian faith. These images are meant to evoke contemplation, reverence, and gratitude for the sacrifice of Jesus.

Images of the cross, such as the crucifix, are symbolic representations of God's plan of redemption through the sacrifice of Jesus Christ. They serve as a powerful reminder of the core beliefs of Christianity related to salvation, forgiveness, and the love of God for humanity.

Whether someone should attend a church or support social media that displays Christ still on the cross is a personal decision influenced by their beliefs and preferences. Here are some points to consider: Symbolism: For many so- called Christians, (such as Catholics and some religious Jews) the crucifix (with Christ on the cross) is a powerful symbol of Jesus' sacrifice and love. It serves as a reminder of the core beliefs of Christianity. Denominational Differences: Different Christian denominations have varying views on the use of crucifixes. Some traditions use them prominently in their worship spaces, while others prefer empty crosses to symbolize the resurrection which is the correct representation. Personal Preference: Some individuals may find comfort and inspiration in the visual representation of Christ's sacrifice on the cross. Others may prefer a more abstract or symbolic representation of their faith. However I am still in doubt about the salvation of such individuals Focus of Worship: It's essential to consider whether the presence of a crucifix enhances or detracts from your worship experience. Some incorrectly may find it aids in focusing on the significance of Christ's sacrifice, while others may feel it distracts from other aspects of their faith.

The image of Christ still on the cross at the end of this post is offensive to Christianity and all Christians. Christ has completed his work and is not still on the cross. This image seems to be made by someone who does not believe in God's plan of redemption, perhaps a non-Christian or a Jew? Call yourself a Christian or whatever you like, but sharing conspiracy theories and then asking people to accept the Lord when you haven't been saved yourself is hypocritical. You may think this image is harmless, but the Lord will see where your heart truly lies. You may have fooled many people, but I am not one of them.

Ultimately, whether you should attend a church or financially support online media that displays Christ on the cross (I would not) depends on your personal beliefs, comfort level, and how you connect with the symbolism of the crucifix. If you have reservations or preferences in this regard, you may want to explore different churches, denominations or social media that align more closely with your spiritual practices or in this instance non spiritual practices.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

In a recent development, a New York jury has found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records. This is the first time a former U.S. president has been convicted of a crime. The jury deliberated for 9½ hours to reach this verdict, in what is described as a historic case.

After the Trump verdict, most Republicans, such as the Cutting Edge Ministries, say they're okay with having a criminal as president. It will now be a case of how the American people view the respective criminals running for the presidency and who is the lesser scoundrel of the two—either the playboy clown or the senile old man who reads everything from a teleprompter.

Donald Trump is scheduled to be sentenced on July 11, just four days before the Republican National Convention. The penalties he faces range from a fine to up to four years in prison on each count. However, it is anticipated that he would likely be sentenced for the offences concurrently rather than consecutively.

Former President Donald Trump’s guilty verdict may indeed be hurting him in the polls, according to data published Wednesday. In a redo of a recent New York Times/Sienna College poll, Trump’s three-point edge over President Joe Biden before the jury rendered its verdict shrank to just one point when respondents were quizzed after the decision.

It is quite rare that out of a nation of well over 350 million American politics has resorted to these two. What has gone wrong with the USA?

The current political situation in the USA has been influenced by several factors. Here are some reasons based on real-time information:

1. Partisan Fighting: Overwhelming majorities in both parties believe there is too much partisan fighting, which can lead to gridlock and hinder progress.

2. Campaign Costs: Many Americans feel that campaigns cost too much, leading to concerns about the influence of money in politics.

3. Lobbyists and Special Interests: The influence of lobbyists and special interests in shaping policies and decisions has raised concerns about the fairness and transparency of the political process.

4. Negative Views: Americans hold unrelentingly negative views of politics and elected officials, with little hope for improvement in the near future.

5. Challenging Problems: The country faces significant challenges such as climate change, immigration, inequality, gun control, debt, and deficits. The perceived inability of government and politicians to effectively address these issues contributes to the current political climate.

These factors have contributed to a sense of frustration and disillusionment among many Americans regarding the state of politics in the USA. Recognizing these challenges is the first step towards addressing them and working towards a more constructive and inclusive political environment.

There is no doubt that if Trump is reelected, the world will have far less security than it does now. The entire time he was previously in power, I felt anxious about his potential actions. The situation remains unchanged. Consequently, there will still be those who see Trump as a savior (such as the Cutting Edge Ministries) because of his false promise of economic prosperity and will vote based on their own financial interests.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kCElgUuYcg 

Recently, there have been discussions and reports surrounding the permission granted to Ukraine to attack sites within Russia. This development comes in the context of the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, fuelled by territorial disputes and historical tensions.

Here are some key points to consider regarding this sensitive issue:

• Permission Granted: Reports suggest that Ukraine has been given the green light to target certain sites within Russia. This move marks a significant escalation in the conflict between the two nations.

• International Reaction: The international community has expressed concern over the potential consequences of such actions. Many countries have called for restraint and a peaceful resolution to the conflict.

• Legal and Ethical Implications: The permission to attack sites within another sovereign nation raises serious legal and ethical questions. International law prohibits acts of aggression against other countries, and such actions could have far-reaching consequences.

• Humanitarian Concerns: The escalation of hostilities between Ukraine and Russia raises concerns about the impact on civilians in the region. It is essential to prioritize the safety and well-being of innocent people caught in the crossfire.

• Diplomatic Efforts: Diplomatic channels remain crucial in resolving conflicts and preventing further violence. Dialogue and negotiations must be pursued to seek a peaceful solution to the ongoing crisis.

• Global Stability: The conflict between Ukraine and Russia has implications for global stability. It is essential for all parties involved to exercise restraint and work towards de-escalation to avoid further destabilisation in the region.

The permission granted to Ukraine to attack sites within Russia represents a dangerous escalation in an already volatile situation. It is crucial for all parties to prioritise peace, dialogue, and respect for international law to prevent further harm and suffering in the region. Diplomatic efforts must be intensified to find a sustainable solution to the conflict and protect the well-being of all people involved.

However, it will not be possible to negotiate with Putin because he is steadfast in his desire to control Ukraine. This is akin to controlling the Jews and the genocide they are committing in Gaza

Russia-Ukraine Conflict: Russian forces have made "tactically significant advances" near Kharkiv, with the war now in its third year. The conflict continues to escalate, and it is crucial to monitor the latest developments.

Retaliatory Actions Against Putin: There are discussions about possible retaliatory measures against Putin. Putin has warned against certain actions, and countries are considering their responses to the ongoing situation.

Putin's Nuclear Weapons Threats: Putin has made veiled threats to use tactical nuclear weapons against the West. This has raised concerns about the potential consequences of such actions.

In conclusion, given that Russia is currently pushing back Ukrainian forces, some are arguing that any retaliatory action is justified to stop Putin. Putin's threats to use nuclear weapons is sabre rattling. If he follows through, the devastation inflicted on Russia in response will be unimaginable, and it could potentially be catastrophic for the whole nation. China (despite supplying Russia with weapons) is not expected to intervene. Putin has been the instigator from the beginning by attacking Ukraine. It is now time to respond decisively and hit Russia hard before potential future complications arise, such as the possibility of Trump returning to the presidency of the United States.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kCElgUuYcg

Barry R. Smith was a controversial figure known for his evangelistic and apocalyptic messages. He was often criticized for using fear tactics to try to persuade people to adopt his religious beliefs. Some detractors claimed that he attempted to scare people into embracing his version of Christianity in order to be Born Again and find a place in Heaven.

This approach of using fear to motivate spiritual decisions is a topic of debate within religious communities, with some seeing it as effective in prompting repentance and others viewing it as manipulative or coercive. Even while his supporters saw him as one of the world’s biggest conspiracy theorists, Smith's methods and messages generated mixed reactions and opinions among both supporters and critics. Smith often headed his meetings with the term, New World Oder.

The concept of a global government (New World Oder) you advocate here is a complex and controversial topic.

Global Government: The idea of a global government refers to a hypothetical system in which a single political authority would govern the entire world. Such a system would supersede national governments and have authority over international issues such as security, economy, and environment.

Real or Made Up Concept: Currently, there is no formal global government in place. The world is primarily governed by independent sovereign states with their own governments. However, there are international organizations like the United Nations (UN) that facilitate cooperation between countries on various global issues.

Secret Individuals and Organizations: While there is no concrete evidence to suggest the existence of a secret global government, conspiracy theories sometimes speculate about secretive groups or individuals exerting influence over global affairs. These theories often lack substantial evidence and are widely regarded as speculative.

Global Influence: It is important to note that certain powerful individuals, corporations, and organizations do have significant influence on global politics, economics, and societal issues. This influence can manifest through lobbying, financial power, media control, and other means. However, this falls short of a formal global government.

While the concept of a global government is not a current reality, there are influential entities that shape international affairs. The idea of a secret global government remains largely speculative and lacks substantial evidence. It is essential to critically evaluate sources and information when considering such complex and controversial topics.

It seems like you're using scare tactics or fear-mongering to manipulate people for personal gain, such as attracting more subscribers to a channel. It's important to be aware of such tactics and critically evaluate the information presented to you. Here are a few points to consider in such situations:

• Critical thinking: It's essential to think critically and question information that is presented to you, especially if it seems designed to evoke fear or manipulate emotions.

• Fact-checking: Verify the information you receive from sources that use scare tactics. Look for reputable sources to confirm the validity of the claims being made.

• Emotional manipulation: Be cautious of content that preys on your emotions, particularly fear. Emotional manipulation can cloud judgement and lead to hasty decisions.

• Seek diverse sources: It's beneficial to seek information from a variety of sources to get a well-rounded view of a particular topic. This can help you avoid falling victim to biased or manipulative content.

• Educate yourself: Take the time to educate yourself on various topics so that you can discern between factual information and fear-based manipulation.

In conclusion, by staying informed, thinking critically, and being aware of manipulative tactics, you can protect yourself from being swayed by scaremongering tactics of the kind displayed here and make more informed decisions based on reliable information.

It's important to recognize that information shared online or in postings can sometimes be specific to certain regions or contexts. Sensationalism and exaggeration are common in various media outlets, and it's crucial to discern what is relevant to your own situation or location. If a post seems overly sensationalized or focused on a specific region like the UK, it may not necessarily apply universally. It's always a good idea to fact-check and consider the broader perspective before drawing conclusions or making judgements based on sensational content. Most people (myself included) already have plenty of problems without needing to take the content of this post seriously. This channel and its contents do not lead to salvation.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

President Joe Biden outlined a three-phase deal proposed by Israel to Hamas militants in an effort to achieve peace in the Middle East and end the longstanding conflict in the region. Here are the key points about the proposed deal and the related developments:

Details of the Proposal:

• Three Phases: The proposal consists of three phases aimed at securing a lasting cease-fire and the release of all hostages.

Phase 1:

• Duration: Six weeks

• Actions: Full cease-fire, withdrawal of Israeli forces from densely populated areas of Gaza, and release of specific groups of hostages (women, elderly, wounded).

• Reciprocity: Release of hundreds of Palestinian prisoners.

Phase 2:

• Actions: Release of all remaining living hostages, including male soldiers, and complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.

Phase 3:

• Focus: Commencement of major reconstruction efforts in Gaza to address the extensive damage caused by the conflict.

Biden's Remarks:

• Enduring Cease-fire: Biden referred to the proposal as a "road map to an enduring cease-fire and the release of all hostages."

• Hamas Commitments: Emphasized the importance of Hamas honoring its commitments for the cease-fire to become permanent.

• Challenges: Acknowledged the difficulties and details that need to be negotiated to transition between phases.

Congressional Invitation:

• Israeli PM Address: Congressional leaders invited Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to deliver an address at the U.S. Capitol.

• Concerns: Some Democrats express concerns about Israel's approach to the conflict.

• No Set Date: No specific date has been scheduled for Netanyahu's speech at the Capitol.

Israeli Military Operations:

• Current Operations: Israeli forces are engaged in expanding their offensive in central parts of Rafah in southern Gaza.

• Decisive Moment: Biden described the situation as a critical moment, emphasizing the need for peace efforts to progress.

Challenges Ahead:

• Negotiations: Both sides need to agree on the release ratios of hostages and prisoners for the subsequent phases.

• Commitment: Israel remains committed to a military defeat of Hamas, posing a challenge to the peace process.

The proposed deal represents a significant opportunity for progress towards peace in the region, but resolving the remaining issues and ensuring both parties' compliance will be key to its success.

The Biden peace incentive was precisely the same one brokered in Egypt, already agreed upon by Hamas but soundly rejected by Israel. Nothing has changed with Israel not agreeing to anything and wishing to continue with their slaughter of defenceless Palestinian civilians despite international condemnation of their actions.

Now Netanyahu has come out and said he will not negotiate peace until Trump regains the presidency of the United States, which appears to be just an excuse to prolong the genocide anyway.
However - remembering the covenant of Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27 - this form of rhetoric is misleading for those who view Trump as the Antichrist.

It's important to differentiate between personal beliefs and factual information. The claim that Trump is the Antichrist is not supported by any verifiable evidence or biblical scripture.

The concept of the Antichrist is a theological idea found in some interpretations of the Bible, particularly in the Book of Revelation, but attributing this title to a specific individual, such as Donald Trump, is a matter of personal opinion rather than fact.

Trump has nothing to do with any current or future Bible prophecies. For anyone to suppose this guilty verdict is a sign from God is a matter of concern.

I am waiting for someone to come out and draw comparisons between his trial and guilty verdict to that of Christ and then claim it proves he is the Antichrist. Nevertheless, this trial is only the beginning, Trump still has four more ahead of him.

Approach matters of faith and prophecy with caution and discernment. Drawing comparisons between current events and biblical prophecies can be subjective and speculative.
The Beast has to receive a fatal wound from the sword (meaning a weapon) and then miraculously recovers. Rev 13: 3. This has not happened in the instance of Trump. Furthermore, there is no correlation between Trump and the ten-nation confederacy the Antichrist controls.

In summary—Peace Incentive: The peace initiative mentioned involving Biden, Hamas, and Israel reflects the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Negotiations and agreements in this region often face challenges and obstacles from various parties involved. Netanyahu's Statement: Netanyahu's reported stance on not negotiating peace until Trump regains the presidency may reflect political strategies and dynamics rather than solely related to biblical interpretations. Biblical Interpretations: References to biblical scriptures, such as Daniel Chapter 9, Verse 27, and discussions about the Antichrist, are deeply rooted in religious beliefs and interpretations. These views vary among individuals and religious groups. Trump and Antichrist Claims: Connecting modern political figures like Trump to biblical prophecies, such as the Antichrist, is a matter of personal belief and interpretation. It's essential to differentiate between theological interpretations and factual information. Caution in Interpretations: When discussing matters of faith, prophecy, and current events, it's crucial to approach them with discernment and critical thinking. Drawing parallels between individuals and biblical figures should be done carefully to avoid misinformation or misinterpretation. Prophecy and Current Events: While some may find similarities between certain events and biblical prophecies, it's important to remember that interpretations can vary widely. Correlations should be examined thoughtfully and with an understanding of historical context. the discussion of political events, biblical prophecies, and personal beliefs is intricate and multifaceted.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb2Hbbp_puc

I understand what you are attempting to do here with some of these postings, but it looks to me like you are right out of line in this instance.

Firstly, It's important to differentiate between personal beliefs and factual information. The claim that Trump is the Antichrist supposed by some is not supported by any verifiable evidence or biblical scripture. The concept of the Antichrist is a theological idea found in some interpretations of the Bible, particularly in the Book of Revelation, but attributing this title to a specific individual, such as Donald Trump, is a matter of personal opinion rather than fact.

Trump has nothing to do with any current or future Bible prophecies. For anyone to suppose this guilty verdict is a sign from God is a matter of concern. I am waiting for someone to come out and draw comparisons between his trial and guilty verdict to that of Christ and then claim it proves he is the Antichrist. This trial is only the beginning, Trump still has four more ahead of him.

It's important to approach matters of faith and prophecy with caution and discernment. Drawing comparisons between current events, legal proceedings, and biblical prophecies can be subjective and speculative. Here are a few points to consider regarding the statements you've shared:

• Interpretation of Prophecy: Interpreting current events as fulfilment of biblical prophecies can vary widely among individuals and religious groups. It's crucial to exercise critical thinking and seek guidance from trusted spiritual leaders or sources.

• Caution with Comparisons: Drawing parallels between contemporary figures like Donald Trump and biblical figures such as Christ or the Antichrist should be done with care. Such comparisons can be sensitive and have significant implications.

• Legal Proceedings and Faith: While legal verdicts have real-world consequences, linking them directly to divine signs or prophecies can be a complex and contentious matter. It's essential to separate legal outcomes from theological interpretations.

• Anticipation of Future Events: Speculating about future trials or events involving specific individuals can lead to unfounded conclusions and undue anxiety. It's advisable to focus on verifiable information and maintain a balanced perspective.

In times of uncertainty or controversy, seeking clarity from reliable sources and engaging in respectful dialogue can help navigate challenging discussions related to faith, prophecy, and current events.

Apart from that, If you have specific claims or statements about Trump that you believe are real and want to discuss how they align with biblical teachings, feel free to share them with us all. We can all help you explore relevant passages from the Bible to clarify any misunderstandings or discrepancies.

When it comes to making things up or drawing the wrong conclusions, it's essential to be mindful of the following: Fabricating information or inventing possible future events like you are doing here can lead to misinformation and confusion.

Making things up such as the elitists (whoever you suppose them to be) don't want him in power, can damage your credibility and trust in communication. It's important to verify information from at least two reliable sources before sharing it to avoid spreading false or misleading details when all you doing here is playing a guessing game.

Drawing the Wrong Conclusions:

• Jumping to conclusions without sufficient evidence can lead to misunderstandings.

• Misinterpreting data or misreading situations can result in incorrect judgements.

• It's crucial to analyze information critically and consider multiple perspectives before concluding.

• Seeking clarification and additional information can help prevent drawing inaccurate conclusions.

Honesty, critical thinking, and a commitment to accuracy are crucial to avoid misrepresenting facts or situations, and it is just about time you saw the forest for the trees. Trump being found guilty of the 34 charges is the top news story of the day, but there is no one, let me repeat that, no one has put a twist on this historical event in the manner have. Anyone listening to any of this would have reason for concern.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ULBoMUE4dZc

This terminology you use at the beginning of your presentations a prophecy update in the light of world events, does not apply to your videos: and has not for some time. It is a term that was used by the late Barry R Smith decades ago to describe world events he saw unfolding relative to scripture. It should never be used by you and for you to do so represents a fake representation of your postings. Helicopter crashes are not prophecy updates. What is the idea behind this deliberate deception? It is akin to the fake Rapture. Get another line because the usage of the term “a prophecy update in the light of world events” language in your instance is an insult to the word of God.

A prophecy update in the light of world events typically refers to an analysis or discussion that connects current global occurrences with predictions or prophecies from religious texts, particularly focusing on the end times or apocalyptic events. Here are some key points related to this topic based on real-time information:

1. Matthew 24:4-14: Jesus provides a list of events that are expected to happen in the Last Days according to the Bible.

2. April 2024 Prophecy Update: Recent signs of the times are discussed, indicating how current events align with biblical prophecies.

3. The Last Generation: This book explores how Bible prophecy is being fulfilled in the present era, drawing on evidence from ongoing world events.

4. Conflict in Israel: Attention is drawn to the conflict in Israel involving Hamas and Iran, suggesting a potential fulfilment of biblical prophecy.

5. March 2024 Prophecy Update: Focuses on the prevalence of wickedness deceiving the world and the importance of wisdom as depicted in Scripture.

These updates and discussions aim to provide insights into how contemporary global events may relate to or fulfill prophetic scriptures, offering perspectives on the significance of these occurrences in the context of religious beliefs.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Donald Trump has been found guilty of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in a scheme to conceal damaging information. The District Attorney announced a 34-count felony trial conviction of Donald J. Trump. Jurors in New York found him guilty on all 34 counts related to falsifying business records to cover up hush money payments. While falsifying business records is typically a misdemeanor charge, it becomes a felony when done in furtherance of certain actions. Trump had pleaded not guilty to these charges. The verdict indicates that he could potentially face jail time for these convictions.

In the United States, a felony conviction does not automatically disqualify someone from running for president or being elected. The U.S. Constitution sets out the requirements for presidential candidates, but it does not specifically address felony convictions as a disqualification.

Here are some key points to consider regarding this issue:

Legal Eligibility: The Constitution states that a person must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, at least 35 years old, and a resident of the country for at least 14 years to be eligible to run for president. It does not mention felony convictions as a barrier to candidacy.

Disqualification by Congress: While there is no explicit legal barrier based on a felony conviction, Congress does have the authority to challenge the election or qualifications of its members, including the president. However, the decision to disqualify a candidate would likely be a complex and contentious political process.

Public Opinion and Perception: The impact of a felony conviction on a candidate's electoral prospects would likely be influenced by public opinion, media coverage, and political discourse. Voters may take into account a candidate's criminal record when deciding whether to support them. Historical Precedents: In the past, there have been instances of politicians with legal issues, including felony convictions, running for and holding public office. The outcome of such cases can vary depending on the circumstances and the response of the electorate.

Overall, while a felony conviction does not automatically disqualify someone from running for president in the U.S., it can have significant implications for their candidacy, including how voters perceive them and how political opponents may use it against them during the campaign.

There are ongoing legal risks and investigations surrounding Donald Trump, with various legal challenges and probes still in progress.

These are the key criminal cases that Donald Trump is currently involved in.

Legal Risks:

1. He has been charged with four criminal counts, including conspiracy to defraud the US and conspiracy against the rights of citizens.

2. The charges against him include willful retention of national security information, obstruction of justice, withholding of documents, and false statements.

3. Counts against Trump also include racketeering, conspiracy to commit forgery, and conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer.

4. He faces charges of defrauding the US government, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of justice, and attempt to obstruct justice.

Investigations:

1. Trump was hit with 13 criminal counts, subsequently reduced to 10, including one alleged violation of Georgia's Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

2. There are ongoing criminal and civil investigations into Donald Trump and his business activities.

3. In addition to the criminal indictments, Trump is also fighting a civil lawsuit that threatens the future of his real estate empire.

If a scenario occurred where Donald Trump won the presidency but was jailed for any of the allegations against him, the country and the international community would likely react in the following ways:

Domestic Reaction:

• Legal and Constitutional Challenges: There would be significant legal and constitutional challenges to a president running the country from jail. Questions would arise about the legality and legitimacy of decisions made by a president who is incarcerated.

• Political Turmoil: The country would experience heightened political turmoil, with debates about the rule of law, separation of powers, and the functioning of democracy.

• Public Opinion: Public opinion would likely be divided, with supporters of the president defending his actions and opponents calling for his removal from office.

• Calls for Impeachment or Resignation: There would be strong calls for impeachment or resignation, as many would argue that a president cannot effectively govern from jail.

International Reaction:

• Loss of Credibility: The international community may view the situation with scepticism and concern, leading to a loss of credibility for the country on the global stage.

• Diplomatic Challenges: Other countries may hesitate to engage with a nation whose leader is in jail, potentially leading to diplomatic challenges and strained relationships.

• Impact on International Agreements: The situation could impact international agreements and treaties that the country is a part of, as other countries may question the legitimacy of agreements made by a jailed president.

Overall, a president running the country from jail would create a highly unusual and unprecedented situation with far-reaching implications both domestically and internationally. It would likely lead to uncertainty, legal battles, political debates, and challenges in governance and diplomacy. 

A jailed president would divide and alienate Americans against each other. In theory, the possible script of the recent movie “Civil War” could come to the fore with the Republicans against Democrats batting each other right across the country. The writers of Cutting Edge Ministries are doing a superb job in helping to create that possible scene with their support of Trump while at the same time showing antagonism against Biden.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Hitler considered himself to be a Christian for several reasons:

1. In a speech during the early years of his rule, Hitler declared himself as "not a Catholic, but a German Christian."

2. Despite being confirmed as a Catholic, Hitler was not a conventional Christian as he rejected beliefs such as the deity, resurrection, and miracles of Jesus.

3. There is overwhelming evidence that Hitler saw himself as a Christian doing God's work, even though his church often opposed him.

4. Hitler was prepared to see Jesus as having been martyred due to his opposition to Jewish practices, but he did not believe in the Resurrection.

These points highlight the complex and controversial nature of Hitler's religious beliefs, However, because he considered himself to be a Catholic Christian his intentions were never to set out to kill Christians, as you allege, only Jews.

Even though the shoe is now on the other foot, the same scenario exists today with those within the United States supporting Israel and the genocide taking place in Gaza calling themselves Christian but acting in the same manner as Hitler by advocating the murdering of thousands of defenseless Palestinians. Please do not make out that is not true, because it absolutely is.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

The concept of the Antichrist and the idea of a global dictatorship or control over a quarter of the world are discussed in apocalyptic and religious contexts. Different interpretations exist among various traditions, particularly within Christian theology.

Here are some common perspectives on this topic:

• Global Dictatorship: Some interpretations suggest that the Antichrist will rise to power and establish a global dictatorship, exerting control over the entire world. This view is often associated with a one-world government or a system of total domination that could equate to the Mark of the Beast. However, there is nothing in the Bible mentioning a global dictatorship of the Antichrist.

• Control of One-Quarter of the World: Other interpretations propose that the Antichrist may not necessarily control the entire world but could have influence or dominion over a specific region or a portion of the world, such as one-quarter. This perspective is based on certain passages in religious texts that mention the Antichrist's reign over a limited territory, such as either China Russia or even the EU. That is the view that I most align with.

It is important to note that beliefs about the Antichrist and the nature of their rule vary among different religious traditions and individual interpretations. The concept of the Antichrist is a complex and symbolic one with diverse viewpoints on how his influence and power will manifest.

Ultimately, discussions about the Antichrist and his potential rule are often rooted in theological, philosophical, and speculative interpretations, and opinions on the specifics of their governance can differ significantly.

The concept of the Antichrist and the New World Order is a topic that has been widely discussed and interpreted in various ways by different religious and cultural beliefs. In the Book of Revelation, Chapter 6 introduces the four horsemen of the apocalypse, which are often associated with various interpretations and symbols, including conquest, war, famine, and death.

Here are some key points to consider regarding the Antichrist and the New World Order:

• Antichrist in Revelation: The Antichrist is a figure commonly associated with evil and deception in Christian eschatology. While the Book of Revelation does not explicitly mention a world government or global dictatorship led by the Antichrist in Chapter 6, the concept of the Antichrist is further elaborated on in other parts of the Bible.

• Interpretations: Interpretations of the Antichrist and the New World Order vary among religious traditions and individuals. Some believe that the Antichrist will rise to power and establish a global reign of tyranny, while others view the concept differently.

• New World Order: The New World Order is a term used to describe a hypothetical future in which a powerful, secretive elite group seeks to control the world through an authoritarian world government. This concept has been the subject of conspiracy theories and speculation in various circles.

• Differing Views: While some believe that the Antichrist will play a central role in the establishment of a New World Order, others argue that the two concepts are not necessarily linked. The idea of a global dictatorship led by the Antichrist is not universally accepted among scholars and religious leaders.

The relationship between the Antichrist and the New World Order is a complex and contentious topic interpreted in diverse ways. It is essential to consider various perspectives and sources when exploring these concepts and their implications in religious and cultural contexts.

In conclusion, we can still see what the Antichrist does by reading Revelation Chapter 6 and the four horsemen of the apocalypse. There is no mention in those verses of a world government or global dictatorship of the Antichrist. Accordingly, the concept of the New World Order/World Government until the control of the Antichrist is a fallacy.

Blessings