https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nu4Ik4YnIs

I am concerned about YouTube channels that may be using fear-mongering tactics to attract viewers. It's important to be critical of the information you come across online, especially when it pertains to sensitive or potentially misleading topics. YouTube has policies against content that is harmful, misleading, or exploits others.

The Bible describes seven years of tribulation, with the Great Tribulation occurring during the last three and a half years. This is based on the interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27 and Revelation 13:5. The prophetic year used in these calculations is 360 days, which means the Great Tribulation would last 1,260 days.

The use of the number seven concerning the Great Tribulation is deceptive and confusing, and it could explain a lot about your misguided beliefs about the fake Rapture.

It's important to remember that different Christian denominations and individuals interpret biblical passages differently. While some Messianic Jews may believe the Great Tribulation lasts seven years, genuine Christians interpret it as three and a half years.

The Bible uses seven years to describe the end times beginning with the signing of a seven-year Middle East covenant by the Antichrist and three and a half years in its description of the Great Tribulation.

There's no way to predict when the final seven years will begin, so your claim to know when it will is misleading. If you are not a prophet, you are surely giving the impression you are pretending to be one.

Ballistic missile attacks on Israel by Iran is not as urgent as you suggest. Making false statements such as this makes it seem your sole intention is always to gain more subscribers. I believe this channel should be removed from YouTube altogether.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2MwK77d8pc&t=565s 

The **Electoral College** is a group of electors established every four years during the presidential election to elect the President and Vice President of the United States. The Electoral College consists of **538 electors**, and a majority of **270 electoral votes** is required to elect the President. Each state is allocated a number of electors based on its population, as determined by the Census. The electors then cast their votes for the President and Vice President.

The national popular vote is not the deciding factor in determining the winner of the US presidency. The **Electoral College** system is used to elect the president, where each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on its population. The candidate who wins the majority of electoral votes wins the presidency, even if they lose the popular vote.

The Democratic candidate has won the national popular vote in every election since **1992**, except for **2004** and **2016**. However, it is important to note that the national popular vote is not a reliable indicator of the outcome of the Electoral College vote. For example, in **2020**, **Donald Trump** won the presidency despite losing the popular vote to **Hillary Clinton** by nearly **3 million votes**.

**California** is excluded, the Republican candidate has won the national popular vote since **1968**. However, it is important to note that this is a hypothetical scenario and does not reflect the actual outcome of the elections. The national popular vote is a complex issue with a long history. It is important to understand the different factors that contribute to the outcome of US presidential elections, including the Electoral College system, the role of swing states, and the influence of third-party candidates.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2MwK77d8pc

Allan Lichtman

The "Nostradamus of polling," historian Allan Lichtman, stated that an October surprise would not alter his prediction that Donald Trump will lose to Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. Lichtman, known for accurately predicting nine out of 10 presidential elections since 1984, dismissed the idea of an October surprise as a myth.

He explained that he has never changed his prediction in response to an October surprise, emphasizing that his method focuses on evaluating the big picture of incumbent governance and strength rather than being swayed by campaign events.

Lichtman's theory was validated in 2016 when he correctly predicted Trump's election win despite the October surprise of the Access Hollywood tape, in which Trump made shocking comments about women. Despite the revelation, Trump went on to win the election.

In response to what could be called fraud here is what Roger Stone said on his website.

https://www.stonecoldtruth.com/p/allen-lichtman-who-claims-to-have

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_2MwK77d8pc

You are now in a catch-22 type of situation. Once again, you are trying to predict the election outcome with poll numbers that can be rigged in favor of one candidate or another. In your case, you will go with any numbers to suggest Harris will lose and in doing so call Trump the Antichrist, even though there is no biblical evidence to support your false claims. This is now a game of hit or miss. If Trump wins, you can then continue to call him the Antichrist and continue with the same set of lies you have perpetrated for years.

On the other hand, if Harris wins, then your goose is cooked and you will be seen by the whole world as a false prophet. I have also noted that despite you answering a lot of comments, support for your Antichrist claim is waning in the comments section. At the end of the day, you still cannot win. Even if Trump loses, it is your word only that he is the Antichrist, which is not the opinion of the majority, and as a result, you will not gain any more subscribers than you already have.

I want to emphasize that the above statement is a hypothetical scenario about a person on YouTube (JK) making claims about a political figure. It's crucial to remember that making claims without evidence can be harmful and misleading. My response is purely an opinion only. When discussing political figures and the possibility of them fulfilling Bible prophecy, it's important to rely on credible sources and engage in respectful dialogue. This is what I have aimed to do here.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nu4Ik4YnIs

It's important to consider the potential risks of combining Pentecostal/Charismatic teachings with Judaism, particularly when these teachings contradict Jewish beliefs. 

Some specific challenges and conflicts can arise from this combination. For example, Pentecostal teachings may influence Messianic Jewish movements, leading to latent hostility between Jewish and Christian beliefs.

Additionally, some Pentecostal practices, such as speaking in tongues and faith healing, which have been proven to be baseless, may be considered superstitious by Jewish tradition.

It's crucial to be aware of these potential conflicts and to approach this combination with sensitivity to minimize such antagonism.

Publishing depictions of Christ still on the cross when he is off the cross and the job is finished favors unbelieving Jews, while teaching salvation at the same time is hypocritical and anti-Christ, and can only lead to a heightened strain. 

I hope all this helps you understand that all indicators suggest your salvation may be at risk.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nu4Ik4YnIs&t=329s

I understand your concern about comment moderation and its potential impact on subscriber retention. It's true that online platforms sometimes delete or choose not to publish comments. This is often done to maintain a safe and respectful user environment. While I strive to be as inclusive as possible, I also have a responsibility to prevent the spread of harmful content, such as hate speech, harassment, or misinformation. Balancing freedom of expression and the need for a positive online community is crucial. I am always working to improve my moderation policies and processes, and I welcome your feedback.

I stand by my previous comment about the supposed Fake Rapture of the church. In my view, the Rapture is misinformation and a money-making scam, even though you may see it differently. I don't believe the Bible speaks of a Rapture as an important prophetic event, but rather the Day of The Lord. You have now shown that you delete comments that don't align with your viewpoints and opinions. Your teachings on Judaism are disdainful and disrespectful to all Christians while you mostly report on news that's already in the headlines. I will continue to publish the comments you choose not to show to the world.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nu4Ik4YnIs

Solar Eclipse 2024

The Feast of Trumpets, also known as Yom Teruah, is a Jewish holiday that occurs on the first day of the seventh month of the Hebrew calendar, typically falling in September or October. It is a day of remembrance and reflection marked by the blowing of the shofar, a ram's horn.

The Feast of Trumpets is mentioned in the Bible in Leviticus 23:23-25, where God instructs the Israelites to observe this day as a Sabbath rest.

Some Christians and Jews believe that the Feast of Trumpets is a prophetic foreshadowing of the Rapture, the event when believers will be taken up to heaven. They point to passages like 1 Thessalonians 4:16, which speaks of a trumpet sounding at the time of the resurrection.

Solar eclipses are also mentioned in the Bible, often as a sign of God's judgement or divine intervention. For example, in Joel 2:30-31, the prophet Joel describes the sun being turned to darkness and the moon to blood before the coming of the Lord.

Some Christians and Jews interpret this as a prophecy of a solar eclipse occurring before the end of time. However, it's important to note that there are different interpretations of these biblical passages, and not all Christians agree on their specific meaning or application. It's also worth noting that solar eclipses are natural phenomena that occur regularly and they don't necessarily have to be interpreted as signs of the end times.

There are different perspectives on whether Christians should observe Jewish traditions, feasts, or customs. Some Messianic Jews believe that observing Jewish holidays can offer deeper insights into Jesus's life and teachings and enhance their understanding of the New Testament. Others believe that Christians are not obligated to keep Jewish holidays, as they were for the Jews, and that they have freedom in Jesus Christ.

The Bible does not explicitly state whether Christians should observe Jewish traditions. Still, it does mention that Jesus observed Jewish holidays, such as Sukkot (the Feast of Tabernacles or Festival of Booths). Some Christians believe that this indicates that it is acceptable for Christians to observe Jewish holidays, while others believe that Jesus was simply fulfilling the requirements of the Jewish law at the time. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to observe Jewish traditions is a personal one for each Messianic Jew.

Both religions share a common ancestor in Abraham, who is considered the father of both Judaism and Christianity. However, there are some key differences between the two:

Judaism

- Focuses on the Torah: The Torah, the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, is considered the most important text in Judaism. It contains the laws, stories, and teachings of God.

- Monotheistic: Judaism believes in one all-powerful and all-knowing God.
- Emphasis on ethical behavior: Judaism emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior, such as justice, compassion, and charity.

- No belief in Jesus: Judaism does not believe that Jesus was the Messiah or the Son of God.

Christianity

- Focuses on the New Testament: Christianity is based on the teachings of Jesus Christ, as recorded in the New Testament of the Bible.

- Belief in Jesus as the Messiah: Christians believe that Jesus was the Messiah, the Son of God, who died for the sins of humanity and rose from the dead.

- Emphasis on salvation: Christianity emphasises the importance of salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.

- Belief in the Trinity: Christianity believes in the Trinity, which is the belief that God exists as three distinct persons: the Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Spirit.

It's important to note that these are just some of the key differences between Judaism and Christianity, and there are many other nuances and beliefs within each religion.

As a fundamentalist Born Again Christian, I have no interest in Judaism, the Torah, or the Hebrew Bible.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nu4Ik4YnIs

 

It's important to remember that deeply held beliefs, especially those rooted in religious faith, such as the concept of a fake Rapture, can be challenging to change. People often cling to these false beliefs for comfort, meaning, and belonging.

While it might be challenging to convince someone to change their mind, consider these approaches:

* **Focus on common ground:** Instead of focusing on points of disagreement, try to find common ground with the person. Do you both believe in the Bible? Do you both believe in Jesus? Building a foundation of shared beliefs might make them more receptive to your arguments.

* **Listen actively:** Instead of trying to convince them, try understanding their perspective. Why do they believe as they do? What are their concerns about your view? Active listening can help you understand their position better and potentially find ways to bridge the gap.

* **Offer resources:** If you have resources that support your views, like scholarly articles or theological commentaries, offer them without being pushy. People are more likely to consider different perspectives if they feel respected and valued.

* **Respect their beliefs:** Even if you disagree with someone's beliefs, it's important to respect them. Avoid being judgmental or dismissive. Remember that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs.

It's important to remember that you can't force someone to change their mind. But by approaching the conversation with empathy, understanding, and respect, you might be able to open a door for dialogue and potentially lead to a more nuanced understanding of the topic. I hope this helps.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9jGvN-ziOk

There could be clues to a person's mindset if they start shifting from predicting future events with irrational thoughts (known as catastrophic thinking) and publishing their thoughts and then delving into a world of complete fantasy by writing fiction books.

The line between normal thought patterns and cognitive decline can be quite blurry. It's a spectrum, not a clear-cut division.

Catastrophic thinking, where someone predicts future events with irrational negativity, can be a sign. It's a form of anxiety, where the mind focuses on worst-case scenarios.

However, writing fiction doesn't necessarily indicate a shift into a world of total fantasy. Many people find solace and escape in writing, using it as a creative outlet to explore different realities. It can be a healthy way to process emotions and anxieties.

Here's where the distinction lies:
- Catastrophic thinking focuses on negative and unrealistic predictions about the future. It's often accompanied by intense fear and worry.

- Writing fiction can be a way to explore imagined scenarios, both positive and negative. It can be a form of self-expression and storytelling.

The key difference is intent. Someone engaging in catastrophic thinking is consumed by fear and negativity, while someone writing fiction is often seeking creative expression and exploration.

Of course, there are situations where writing fiction could be a sign of more serious cognitive decline. If someone's writing becomes increasingly detached from reality, filled with illogical or nonsensical ideas, and they are unable to distinguish between fiction and reality, it could be a cause for concern. (ie The Seed Of Satan)

A mental health professional can assess the situation and offer support, and that is what I suggest you do.

I hope this comment has been of assistance.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9jGvN-ziOk&t=459s 

It's important to recognize that irrational thoughts about future events, especially doomsday events, are often referred to as catastrophic thinking. This type of thinking involves assuming the worst-case scenario will occur, even when there is little evidence to support it.

It's commonly defined as imagining irrational, worst-case outcomes, falling within the bounds of cognitive distortions—errors in thinking where some people have exaggerated thoughts that have no basis in reality.

These thoughts can range from health concerns and social anxiety issues to generalized worries and even thoughts that a seven-year period of tribulation may begin soon, where negative outcomes are imagined if certain behaviors are not engaged in, such as publishing irrational thoughts online.

People with catastrophic thinking do seek help. The information I found states that empathically supporting someone to talk about their anxiety and—when appropriate—seeking help can be unburdening and immensely helpful. It also mentions that working with a mental health professional can be help if catastrophizing is tied to an underlying mental disorder.

So, while it's not explicitly stated that people with catastrophic thinking always listen to others when their illogical thoughts are discussed, it does suggest that they are open to seeking help and support.

Therefore, seek help for your disorder and avoiding burdening others with your reason-less thought patterns, which are non-productive and of very little help to anyone, is important. Deleting the comments of those who disagree with catastrophizing will not help but will only add to your anxiety. I hope this has been of some help.

Blessings