https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XryKZESwd9Q  

The Antichrist will reign for 42 months, after the signing of a seven-year peace treaty

I'm not sure if I understood your response correctly. It seemed like you were suggesting that the reign of the Antichrist lasted for seven years when you asked where the first three and a half years went in response to a previous comment. This comment infers that you are getting into the Rapture debate again, which is somewhere that I am not going because the Bible never mentions two events.

In Revelation 13:5, it is said that the unbridled reign of the Antichrist will last for **42 months**, which corresponds to **3½ years**.

While it does not, some interpretations propose that this period represents the Great Tribulation.

**Calculating Days**:

- Using this figure for the number of days in a Jewish year (360 days), each month must be 30 days in length (360/12 = 30).

- Therefore, the total length of the Antichrist's reign can be calculated as exactly **1,260 days** (42 months × 30 days/month) or **the first 3½ years leading to the end** and then when he breaks the treaty and the final 1,260 days of the Great Tribulation begins.

There are differing opinions on how long the Antichrist will reign, with some attributing this to the fake Rapture controversy. However, it is generally believed that this period will be marked by great turmoil and deception. It will culminate in significant events such as the Last Judgement and the return of the Lord culminating at the end of seven years, beginning after the signing of the covenant mentioned in Daniel Chapter 9 Verse 27.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHcMX1Fad2M 

It is irrelevant what one believes or thinks, and it is of no importance to anyone except oneself what one's beliefs or thoughts are. We are all individual entities, responsible for our actions, and one day we will all be held accountable for our wrongdoings, including John Hagee. Every person has the freedom to choose whether or not to believe in Jesus Christ.

• Beliefs and Thoughts: Beliefs and thoughts are indeed personal and can vary greatly among individuals. Each person's beliefs shape their worldview and guide their actions.

• Isolation and Individuality: The idea of each person being an "island" suggests a sense of isolation and individuality in our beliefs and experiences. While we can connect with others, our inner beliefs are unique to us.

• Accountability for Actions: The mention of answering for our sins implies a belief in personal accountability and the idea that our actions have consequences, whether in this life or beyond.

• Free Will: The concept of free will acknowledges that individuals have the autonomy to make choices, including beliefs about spirituality and religion.

• Choice in Belief: The reference to choosing to believe in Christ or not reflects the idea that faith is a personal decision that individuals can make based on their own convictions and experiences.

• John Hagee: John Hagee is a well-known American pastor and author who leads a megachurch in San Antonio, Texas. He is known for his conservative views and teachings on Christian prophecy.

Remember that beliefs are deeply personal and can shape our lives in profound ways. Each person's journey is unique, and respecting diverse beliefs is essential in fostering understanding and empathy in our interactions with others.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XkQHG3osw4&t=69s

Satan's Fake Rapture

You keep saying, "I will meet you in the clouds." Many people believe that they will meet other Christians in the clouds, which suggests a concept of the church being taken away. However, the Bible does not describe two separate events—namely, the Day of the Lord and an alleged Rapture. Those who claim they will meet others in the clouds are merely speculating about when the Day of the Lord will occur?

Interestingly, despite millions of near-death experiences recorded worldwide, not one describes meeting the Lord in the air. Instead, most accounts involve travelling through a tunnel towards a bright light that many identify as a divine presence. Therefore, when some people say they will meet the Lord in the air, they imply that they believe they will still be alive when Christ returns when the Day of The Lord cannot be identified in scripture.

1. **Meeting in the Clouds**: The belief that Christians will meet the Lord in the air is primarily rooted in **1 Thessalonians 4:17**, which states, "Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air." This passage is often referenced in discussions about the Rapture, where believers anticipate being taken up to meet Christ.

2. **Speculation on Events**: Various interpretations exist regarding the timing and nature of these events. Some theologians argue that the **Day of the Lord** and the Rapture are distinct occurrences, while others see them as interconnected. This latter view is typically associated with those who favour Israel. The lack of clear separation in scripture can lead to speculation about when these events will occur, which has spurred a new industry of end-times material that is none Biblical.

3. **Belief in Being Alive at His Return**: When individuals express the belief that they will meet the Lord in the air, it often implies an expectation of being alive at the time of His return. This belief is rooted in the hope of being part of the group described in **1 Thessalonians 4:17**. Many Christians hold on to the idea of the imminent return of Christ, which shapes their understanding of these events.

In summary, while many Christians strongly believe in meeting the Lord in the air, interpretations of scripture and personal experiences can vary widely. The connection between these beliefs and the timing of the Day of the Lord continues to be a topic of theological discussion and personal conviction that is mainly wrong.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XkQHG3osw4

The Two-State Solution to the Middle East crisis

UN PUSHES TWO-STATE SOLUTION BY JUNE 2025, but what are the biblical connotations?

The concept of a **two-state solution** for Israel and Palestine carries significant implications in both contemporary politics and biblical contexts.

Here are some key biblical considerations related to this issue:

1. **Peace and Coexistence**: The idea of two nations living side by side can be viewed as a pursuit of peace, a recurring theme in the Bible. Scriptures often emphasise the importance of peace and justice, suggesting that both nations should strive for a harmonious existence.

2. **Covenants and Promises**: The Bible contains various covenants that are foundational to the Jewish faith, particularly the **Abrahamic Covenant**. This covenant is interpreted as God's promise to Abraham and his descendants regarding the land of Israel. The implications of this covenant can influence perspectives on land rights and sovereignty.

3. **Prophetic Visions**: Some biblical prophecies speak of a future in which nations will not wage war against one another. For example, passages in **Isaiah** and **Micah** envision a time when swords will be turned into ploughshares, symbolising a transition from conflict to peace. This can be seen as a hopeful vision for a two-state solution.

4. **Justice and Righteousness**: The Bible emphasises the importance of justice, particularly in the treatment of marginalised individuals. Advocates of a two-state solution often argue that it serves as a means to achieve justice for the Palestinian people, aligning with biblical principles of righteousness.

5. **Historical Context**: The land of Israel holds deep historical and spiritual significance for both Jews and Palestinians. The biblical narrative includes various peoples and nations that have inhabited the land, complicating modern claims and aspirations.

6. **Diverse Interpretations**: Different religious and political groups interpret biblical texts in diverse ways, leading to varying views on the legitimacy and feasibility of a two-state solution. Some argue that the Bible supports a singular Jewish state, while others advocate for coexistence based on biblical teachings of love and compassion.

In summary, the biblical implications of a two-state solution are complex and multifaceted, reflecting themes of peace, justice, and historical significance. These interpretations can influence ongoing dialogue and efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

The passage in **Daniel 9:27 (KJV)** states,  And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate. This verse is often interpreted in various ways, particularly in the context of eschatology and prophecy.

Here are some key points to consider regarding the question:

1. **Interpretation of the Covenant**: The “covenant” mentioned in Daniel 9:27 is subject to different interpretations among scholars and theologians. Some view it as a peace treaty related to Israel, while others see it as a broader spiritual or prophetic agreement.

2. **Two-State Solution Context**: The concept of a two-state solution refers to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel. The Bible does not explicitly mention modern political solutions or the opposition of Jewish groups to such solutions. Interpretations of biblical prophecy typically reflect contemporary political contexts, but the text itself does not provide specific guidance on these modern issues.

3. **Opposition Among Jews**: Jewish perspectives on the two-state solution vary widely. Some support it, while others oppose it for various reasons, including security concerns and historical claims to the land. The Bible does not address these contemporary divisions directly.

4. **Prophetic Nature**: Many interpretations of Daniel 9:27 focus on its prophetic nature rather than its applicability to current political situations. The emphasis is often on the fulfilment of prophecy rather than the specifics of political agreements.

While Daniel 9:27 discusses a covenant, it does not explicitly state that it can or cannot be signed without a two-state solution or that it is opposed by all Jews. The interpretations of this verse are diverse and often influenced by current events and theological perspectives.

Even though B.M. said Israel will not agree to it that is irrelevant. If the UN decides on a two-state solution, it will be established irrespective of Israel’s stance for or against such a proposal. Any opposition by Israel could be met with military action and cause further violence and bloodshed in the Middle East according to the word of God.

In summary, I do not intend to propose a solution to the Middle East crisis, but I want to emphasise that a "Two-State Solution" will likely lead to further chaos and bloodshed in this region. 

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN_rhc-LWYU&t=357s 

The **European Union** has condemned Israel's recent military strikes in **Syria**. Here are the key points regarding the EU's response:

1. **Condemnation of Airstrikes**: The EU has expressed strong disapproval of Israel's airstrikes, particularly those targeting military installations and naval assets in Syria. This condemnation reflects concerns about violations of international law.

2. **Sovereignty Issues**: EU officials have emphasised that these actions are viewed as attacks on a sovereign state without provocation, raising significant legal and ethical questions.

3. **Call for Restraint**: The EU has urged Israel to exercise restraint and to consider the broader implications of its military actions on regional stability.

4. **Ongoing Tensions**: This condemnation comes amid escalating tensions in the region, as Israel's military operations are part of a strategy to counter threats from Iranian-backed forces and other militant groups.

These developments underscore the complex dynamics in the Middle East and the international community's concerns about military actions that may further exacerbate conflicts.

The situation suggests Israel is not pursuing peace in the Middle East, raising concerns about the impact on innocent Palestinian civilians who are continually being slaughtered by the IDF daily. I find a Jewish perspective on the current Middle East crisis, for example, the aspiration to construct so-called third temples…biased and uninteresting.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GN_rhc-LWYU

There is a significant contradiction between Donald Trump’s campaign promise to lower grocery prices and the actual priorities of his nominated Cabinet, which primarily focuses on implementing tax cuts.

Trump's second-term Cabinet is composed mainly of billionaires, making it the wealthiest administration in history. This assessment doesn’t even include Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, whom Trump has appointed to lead an unofficial agency focused on public spending.

After reviewing news reports about Trump and his administration’s plans to renew expiring tax cuts, I realised, “Oh my God, they're not reducing grocery prices. They're just giving themselves a tax cut.”

“Do you know what this means? Donald Trump lied.” This also implies that everyone who voted for Trump has fallen into a trap of false promises and outright lies regarding grocery prices. 

They will have to endure a president who sought and won office solely for power and to enrich himself and his fellow billionaires over the next four years.

If he has lied about this, what else has he said to get reelected? One thing is for sure: he will not bring peace to the Middle East or assist his friend Vladimir Putin in resolving the conflict in Ukraine without making land concessions that will never be agreed to by Zelensky.

He cares little for those who voted for him under false pretences. It is no small wonder the world now looks for a savour, an Antichrist, (not Trump) who will lift them out of the economic morass into which they are now rapidly falling. The world is now willing to accept anyone, regardless of whether they come from God or the Devil.

CNN has called Trump a dirty, lying bastard who should be in jail. Since his election, NATO has now announced they are on a war footing fearing Putin will attack other nations.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuO1rYhouHE

Donald Trump is not the Antichrist, and neither is Elon Musk the False Prophet.

You raise some interesting points regarding the interpretations of biblical prophecy and the roles of public figures like **Elon Musk** and **Donald Trump**.

1. **Elon Musk's Role**: Recent reports indicate that **Elon Musk** has been significantly involved in supporting **Donald Trump**, particularly in the context of the 2024 election. For example, Musk has contributed over **$250 million** to assist Trump and the GOP, making him one of the largest donors in this election cycle. This financial backing suggests a close alignment with Trump's political agenda, but it does not imply a personal or official role as a "personal aide."

2. **Biblical Interpretation**: The concepts of a "False Prophet" and the "Antichrist" are often interpreted in various ways within Christian theology. The idea that a false prophet would grant authority to the Antichrist is a traditional interpretation; however, interpretations can vary widely among different denominations and scholars.

3. **Lack of Direct Correlation**: There is no explicit biblical text that directly associates **Trump** with the Antichrist or **Musk** with the false prophet. Many interpretations of scripture are subjective and can depend on individual beliefs and perspectives.

In summary, while Musk's financial support for Trump is notable, it does not automatically categorize him as a false prophet, nor does it confirm Trump as the Antichrist. The connections between these figures and biblical prophecy are complex and often debated among theologians and scholars. This view is not supported by various individuals who have contributed to the discussion on this misinformed channel suggesting otherwise.

Blessings

The Great Pyramid of Giza: A Bible in Stone

The question of who built the Great Pyramid of Giza has been surrounded by various theories and speculations, some of which verge on conspiracy theories. However, the prevailing historical consensus is based on archaeological evidence rather than cover-ups.

Here are some key points to consider:

1. **Historical Evidence**: The Great Pyramid of Giza, built around **2580–2560 BC**, is attributed to Pharaoh **Khufu** (also known as Cheops). Historical records, including inscriptions and writings from Ancient Egypt, support this attribution.

2. **Labour Force**: Contrary to popular belief, there is little evidence suggesting that the pyramids were built by slaves. Instead, they were constructed by a workforce of skilled labourers who were likely organised into teams. These workers were well-fed and housed in nearby workers' villages, as indicated by archaeological findings.

3. **Conspiracy Theories**: Various conspiracy theories have emerged over the years, such as the notion that aliens aided in building the pyramids or that there is a deliberate cover-up regarding their construction. These theories often lack substantial evidence and are generally dismissed by historians and archaeologists.

4. **Modern Interpretations**: Contemporary discussions focus on the advanced engineering techniques used by the ancient Egyptians, which continue to fascinate researchers. However, these discussions highlight the ingenuity of ancient civilisations.

While there are many theories and speculations about the construction of the Great Pyramid of Giza, the evidence supports the idea that it was built by a large, organised workforce under the direction of Pharaoh Khufu: rather than through any form of conspiracy.

The theories proposed by the late New Zealand preacher and author Barry R. Smith, they present a unique perspective that blends historical interpretation with biblical symbolism.

Here are some key points to consider regarding his assertions:

1. **Unknown Builders**: Smith suggested that the Great Pyramid was constructed by **unknown individuals** who were not part of the later Egyptian civilisation. This idea proposes that the original builders had a different cultural or spiritual background, raising questions about the origins of pyramid construction techniques.

2. **Pharaohs as Imitators**: According to Smith, the **Pharaohs** later copied the design of the Great Pyramid to create the smaller pyramids. This implies that the architectural knowledge and inspiration for pyramid construction were not entirely indigenous to Ancient Egypt, but rather borrowed from an earlier, perhaps more advanced, civilisation(s).

3. **Biblical Interpretation**: Smith's assertion that the Great Pyramid can be viewed as a “**Bible in stone**” indicates his belief that the structure holds significant spiritual or prophetic meaning. This perspective aligns with his evangelical background, proposing that the pyramid may encode biblical truths or messages.

4. **Fallen Angels Theory**: While Smith did not propagate the idea that the pyramid was built by **fallen angels**, this notion reflects a broader interest in mystical interpretations of ancient structures. Such ideas often garner scepticism from historians and archaeologists, who prefer evidence-based explanations.

5. **Cultural Impact**: Smith's theories have contributed to ongoing discussions about the **Great Pyramid** and its purpose. They invite both intrigue and criticism, as they challenge conventional archaeological narratives and encourage the exploration of alternative historical interpretations.

In summary, Barry R. Smith's theories about the Great Pyramid of Giza offer a fascinating, albeit controversial, perspective on this ancient monument. While some of his ideas may lack empirical support, they stimulate dialogue about the pyramid's origins, purpose, and significance in both history and spirituality.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFUgjztJ00U

Pope Francis

In response to the recent arson attack on the Adass Israel Synagogue in Ripponlea, Victoria, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has expressed concerns about the rising antisemitism in Australia. This incident, which occurred early on Friday morning, is considered a significant escalation in antisemitic acts within the country.

Here are some key points regarding the situation:

**Nature of the Attack:** The synagogue was set ablaze by masked individuals, resulting in extensive damage. This attack is part of a troubling trend, as it marks the third arson incident linked to antisemitic sentiments in recent weeks.

**Government Response:** In light of this incident, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) has established a task force named "Avalite" to combat antisemitism. This initiative reflects the government's commitment to addressing hate crimes and ensuring the safety of the Jewish community.

**Community Reaction:** Jewish community leaders have voiced their concerns, stating that this attack is indicative of a broader increase in antisemitism in Australia. They emphasize the need for vigilance and support from the government and the public.

**Official Statements:** Prime Minister Albanese has labelled the attack as a potential act of terrorism and has reiterated the importance of standing against hate in all its forms.

However, his change of attitude was not before he faced outrage and significant pressure within the Jewish community regarding his initial characterization of the incident as simply an unfortunate act of antisemitism.

Furthermore, in context of larger geopolitical issues, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has criticized Albanese, suggesting he bears responsibility for the attack because of his initial response claiming he is Anti-Israel.

As if he can point the finger at anyone when he is responsible for butchering well over 40,000 defenceless Palestinians. According to Netanyahu, there is one set of rules for Jews and another set of rules for everyone else which only goes to exasperate the Middle East situation.

However, the core of this matter extends beyond an innocent comment by a Prime Minister. Albanese is a self-proclaimed Roman Catholic.

The relationship between Catholics and Jews has evolved significantly over the centuries, but tensions and misunderstandings still exist today. Here are some key reasons for the ongoing clashes:

1. **Historical Grievances**: The long history of antisemitism within Christianity, including accusations of Jewish deicide (the belief that Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus), has left deep scars. Although the Catholic Church has officially repudiated these views, the historical context still influences perceptions.

2. **Theological Differences**: Fundamental theological differences between Catholicism and Judaism can lead to misunderstandings. For instance, beliefs about Jesus as the Messiah and the nature of God differ significantly between the two faiths, which can create friction in interfaith dialogues.

3. **Cultural Misunderstandings**: Cultural practices and traditions can sometimes clash. Differences in religious observances, dietary laws, and holidays may lead to misunderstandings or a lack of appreciation for each other's customs.

4. **Political Context**: Contemporary political issues, particularly those related to Israel and Palestine, can exacerbate tensions. Some Catholics may have strong political views regarding Israel that do not align with Jewish perspectives, leading to conflict.

5. **Ongoing Dialogue and Education**: While there have been significant efforts to improve Catholic-Jewish relations, such as the Second Vatican Council's *Nostra Aetate*, which called for mutual respect and understanding, there is still much work to be done. Miscommunication and lack of education about each other's beliefs and histories can perpetuate stereotypes and tensions.

6. **Recent Events**: Current events, such as conflicts in the Middle East, can reignite old tensions and lead to renewed clashes between communities. For example, discussions around the Gaza conflict have highlighted differing perspectives and can lead to misunderstandings.

While there have been significant strides toward reconciliation and understanding between Catholics and Jews, historical grievances, theological differences, cultural misunderstandings, and contemporary political issues continue to contribute to clashes between the two communities.

In summary, this situation has resulted in a significant increase in end-times material produced by those who support Israel, often referred to as the "profits of God." these individuals frequently attack the Roman Catholic Church, even going so far as to label the Pope—any Pope—as the Biblical False Prophet.

An example of individuals who support Israel while simultaneously criticizing and attacking Catholics can be found in the book "The Antichrist, The Vatican, and the Alien Cern Delusion" by B.M, a Jewish futurist. This book includes numerous conspiratorial claims, and I choose not to engage with such biased and poorly constructed material. Blessings.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RFUgjztJ00U

A Jewish Scroll

1. **Nature of the Incident**: A synagogue in Melbourne was set on fire in what authorities are treating as a **deliberate arson attack**. This occurred early on Friday, December 6, 2024.

2. **Response from Authorities**: The federal joint counter-terrorism task force has been called in to assist with the investigation. Police were actively patrolling the area following the incident.

3. **Community Impact**: The attack has been widely condemned by political and religious leaders. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expressed his dismay, emphasising the importance of protecting the Jewish community, which includes many Holocaust survivors.

4. **Additional Incidents**: Following the synagogue attack, there was a related incident where a man was removed by police from a nearby Jewish bakery after he was reported to be wielding a hammer and verbally abusing community members.

This attack has raised concerns about safety and security within the Jewish community in Victoria, Australia, while authorities are working diligently to address these issues.

The Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan visited the site of the bombing and pledged $100,000 for the rebuilding efforts. However, her announcement was met with heckles from those in attendance.

Many feel this government is wasteful, particularly as the state is burdened with nearly $200 billion in debt for infrastructure projects. They argue that taxpayers' money is being squandered. Furthermore, if a Pentecostal church had been firebombed, the government likely would not have provided any funds for its reconstruction.

What this firebombing indicates is the intense hatred the community has for Judaism and all its affiliates. Millions of dollars' worth of religious books related to the Torah were destroyed.

Blessings