https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html
The teachings of Jesus Christ. emphasize love, compassion, forgiveness, and non-violence. In the New Testament, Christ's message of love for one another, forgiveness, and helping those in need are central themes. His actions, such as healing the sick and feeding the hungry, exemplified compassion and care for others. The Golden Rule, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you," encapsulates the spirit of empathy and kindness that Christ advocated. These principles continue to inspire and guide the lives of millions of people around the world.
The Bible's Sixth Commandment in the Old Testament states, "Thou shalt not kill," which is interpreted by many Christians as a prohibition against murder. Destruction is viewed negatively within Christian teachings, as the emphasis is often on creation, preservation, and the sanctity of interpretations of religious teachings can indeed vary among different Christian denominations and individual believers. Here are some key points related to the topic:
Interpretations of Religious Teachings:
Different Christian denominations may interpret the Bible and religious teachings in varying ways, leading to diverse perspectives on topics such as self-defense and just war theory.
The interpretation of key scriptures, such as passages from the Old and New Testaments, can significantly influence a Christian's perspective on issues like self-defense and just war.
Self-Defense in Christian Ethics:
The topic of self-defense within Christian ethics is multifaceted and can be understood through different theological and ethical lenses.
Some Christians advocate for the right to self-defense based on the principle of preserving life and protecting oneself and others from harm.
Others may emphasize non-violence and the teachings of Jesus, such as turning the other cheek and loving one's enemies, as guiding principles in ethical decision-making.
Just War Theory:
Just war theory is a framework within Christian theology that seeks to establish ethical principles for the use of force and engagement in warfare.
It outlines criteria for determining when a war can be considered just, emphasizing concepts such as proportionality, just cause, and the principle of last resort.
However, even within just war theory, there can be differences of opinion regarding its application to specific conflicts and situations.
Complex and Debated Topics:
Both self-defense and just war theory are complex and debated topics within Christian ethics, with a wide range of viewpoints existing among theologians, religious leaders, and Christian communities.
Ethical considerations, theological perspectives, and real-world circumstances contribute to the ongoing discussions and debates surrounding these issues.
It's important to recognize the diversity of perspectives within Christianity and the ongoing dialogue and reflection that shape ethical understandings within the faith.
However, we still need to remember that we are not dealing with Christians when referring to the brutality of Israel against unarmed Palestinian citizens—but Jews who are renowned for their viciousness right throughout history.
One of the main reasons Israel was their state was because of the murder of millions of Jews exterminated by the Nazis. In response to the kindness they have been shown by the United States—they then turn around and commit the most heinous war crimes in history against innocent Palestinian civilians.
The difference between self-defense and revenge lies in their intentions, actions, and outcomes:
Self-defense:
Intention: Self-defense is a response to protect oneself or others from imminent harm or danger. The intent is to neutralize the threat and prevent further harm.
Action: It involves using a reasonable amount of force to stop the attack or threat.
Outcome: The goal is to protect oneself or others, and once the threat is neutralized, the self-defense ends.
Revenge:
Intention: Revenge is motivated by a desire to retaliate or inflict harm on the person who committed the initial attack or wrong.
Action: It often involves disproportionate or excessive force, and the intent is to harm the aggressor as payback for the initial attack.
Outcome: The goal is to inflict harm or suffering on the aggressor, often leading to a cycle of retaliation and further harm.
In summary, self-defense is about protection and prevention of harm, while revenge is about retaliation and causing harm in return. The key distinction lies in the intent and the proportional use of force.
So that attack by the Palestinian resistance fighters was the attack that instigated self-defense by Israel has now gone beyond the norms of a reasonable amount of force and onto a disproportionate or excessive force, with the intent of killing as many innocent Palestinians as possible. That is a payback that has now gone onto one of the most brutal forms of revenge in human history.
While Israel has the right to defend itself, the use of disproportionate or excessive force by Israel is not justified because it has led to the loss of life for well over 31,000 innocent civilians and about 70,000 being seriously injured or maimed. Israel lost approximately 1300 lives most of which were caused by friendly fire as a result of Israel defending itself.
It's important to prioritize the protection of human life and avoid actions that could be considered retaliatory or vengeful. Instead of pursuing payback, it's important to work towards a peaceful resolution that respects the rights and dignity of all parties involved.
However, that is not what Israel has chosen to do. Instead, they are still intent on killing more and more Palestinians and displacing them from their land for their benefit to establish illegal settlements.
Special note: there is nothing in the Bible whatsoever anyone can point at to offer as proof that God codons these sorts of actions by Israel. If anyone happens to come forth with verses they claim as evidence of this false assertion—they are either lying, twisting the Bible around to suit a misguided perspective—or don't understand the Bible. That means they are not saved.
It is not appropriate to use the Bible as a justification for violence or discrimination. It is a sacred text that is meant to be interpreted and applied in a way that promotes love, compassion, and understanding.
There is a special place in Hell for Netanyahu and his cabinet of war criminals and for those who codon the outright murder Israel is committing. From there, they will have a long time to mull over their numerous sins.
Blessings
No comments:
Post a Comment