https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vJzQb7PYPPw

The term 'the seed of Satan' is a derogatory and unacceptable expression that has no place in any discourse. It is shocking that you are still promoting a book with this title, as I would have expected it to be discontinued by now. This book is spreading hatred and misinformation, and it should be removed from your platform immediately. You have a responsibility to uphold ethical and professional standards, and this book clearly violates them even though it is total fiction.

I remember a time when I sent an email to A. Franklin, a journalist and author I respected, to voice my disagreement with his coverage of a certain topic. I thought he had been biased and unfair in his reporting, and I wanted to let him know how I disagreed with some his doctrines.

I tried to be polite and respectful, but I also expressed my disappointment and frustration. I hoped he would reply and explain his perspective, or at least acknowledge my feedback. I was hoping for some compassion and understanding from him, since he claimed to be a follower of Christ. However his response was not what I had expected at all from someone calling themselves Christian. He was cold, judgemental and dismissive of my situation and finished the email by calling me a Seed Of Satan. He told me to stop complaining and to repent of my sins. He showed no empathy or kindness, only self-righteousness and condemnation.

Quite politely I told him in response to take the neck tie he wears with the British flag embossed on it and go and hang himself. He was stunned by what I said and then he blamed me for lacking any Christian compassion. This is not the first time I have encountered such hostility in relation to Franklin. Many people have expressed their resentment and anger towards him for his actions and words. He is not a nice man at all.

After that incident, I decided to cut off all ties with Franklin. I didn't want to have anything to do with him ever again. He had betrayed my trust and hurt me deeply. I realised that he was someone with a toxic personality who only brought forth negativity.

This man presents a contradictory image of himself. On his website, he claims to be a follower of Christ and adheres to the teachings of the Bible. However, his actions and words do not reflect the values and principles of Christianity. He is dishonest, hypocritical, and manipulative. He uses his faith as a cover for his selfish and harmful motives.

Andrew Smith disclosed his past relationship with AF, a former colleague and friend of his father Barry. Barry R Smith was a famous preacher and writer, who advocated a the mid-tribulation rapture, among other things. Andrew Smith said that he and AF often had cordial debates about this doctrine, which AF did not endorse. Andrew Smith said that he did not share AF's beliefs, but he respected them. He also praised his father Barry as a godly man and a charismatic speaker, and said that AF was not in the same league as him in terms of influence and impact.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

Many people in the United States believe that there is a significant difference between the two major political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans. They think that these parties represent different ideologies, values, and policies and that their choice of party reflects their own identity and preferences. However, this is a misconception that is perpetuated by the media, the corporations, and the elites who benefit from maintaining the status quo. In reality, the Democrats and the Republicans are just brand names for the same product: a system that serves the interests of the wealthy and powerful, while ignoring or exploiting the needs and rights of the majority of the people. The two parties may differ on some superficial issues, such as social or cultural matters, but they agree on the fundamental ones, such as economic or foreign policy. They both support neoliberalism, imperialism, militarism, corporatism and surveillance capitalism. They both accept donations from the same lobbyists and donors. They both serve the same masters. The two parties are not adversaries, but collaborators in a rigged game that excludes any meaningful alternative or challenge. The two parties are just brand names for one product: a product that is harmful to democracy, justice, and humanity.

The political landscape of the United States has changed dramatically since the 2020 election when Joe Biden defeated Donald Trump in a close race. Trump, who refused to concede and claimed widespread fraud, faced impeachment, lawsuits, and criminal investigations for his role in inciting the violent insurrection at the Capitol on January 6, 2021. He was banned from most social media platforms and lost much of his influence and support among the Republican Party and the public. Biden, on the other hand, has been working to restore trust in democracy, combat the COVID-19 pandemic, and advance his agenda on climate change, health care, and immigration. He has also reached out to allies and adversaries abroad, seeking to repair the damage done by Trump's isolationist and erratic foreign policy.

As the 2024 election approaches, it is clear that it will not be another toss-up between Biden and Trump. Trump will never be allowed near the White House again because he chooses to handle matters himself, without regard for the law, the Constitution, or the will of the people. He has become a pariah in American politics, facing legal challenges and financial troubles that prevent him from running for office again. Biden, meanwhile, has proven to be a steady and effective leader, enjoying high approval ratings and broad support from his party and the public. He has not yet announced whether he will seek a second term, but he has many potential successors who could carry on his legacy. The 2024 election will be a decisive moment for the future of America, but it will not be a repeat of the past.

The Democrats will trot out another puppet to do their bidding. That will not be Kamala Harris. She is more despised than Biden and seen as even more incompetent.

In a historic moment for the United States, Nikki Haley will be elected as the 47th president and the first woman to hold the office. Haley, a former governor of South Carolina and ambassador to the United Nations, ran on a platform of strong leadership, economic recovery, and national security. She will defeat her opponent, Senator Bernie Sanders, by a narrow margin of 51% to 49% in the popular vote and 279 to 259 in the electoral college. Haley is the first president of Indian descent and the second person of colour to lead the nation, after Barack Obama. She is also the first Republican woman to be nominated for president by a major party. Haley's imminent victory is seen as a sign of hope and change for many Americans, especially women and minorities, who have faced discrimination and inequality in the past. Haley has promised to work across party lines and unite the country in the face of the challenges posed by, climate change, terrorism, and global instability. She has also vowed to restore America's reputation and influence in the world, as well as its alliances with its allies. Haley will be sworn in as president on January 20, 2025, along with her vice president, Marco Rubio, a senator from Florida and a son of Cuban immigrants. The inauguration ceremony will mark a new era in American history and politics, as well as a new opportunity for progress and prosperity.

Many people had high hopes that a new president would bring about some positive changes in the country, but they will be disappointed. The president will fail to deliver on her promises and will continue with the same policies and practices of her predecessor. She will not address the pressing issues of the economy, health care, education, or the environment. She will also face criticism for her handling of foreign affairs, human rights, and corruption. It seems that the new president will be just another politician who cares more about her power and interests than the welfare of the people. Therefore, it does not appear anything will change under his administration as the United States will continue its downward spiral to the fulfillment of Revelation Chapter 18.

Blessings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=75s

Contrary to popular belief, Putin and not Hamas were not responsible for the October 07th attack on Israel. This was a clever strategy by Russia to divert the attention of the United States from its interference in Ukraine. By provoking a conflict between Israel and Gaza, Russia made the United States focus on supporting its ally in the Middle East. As a result, the United States gave Israel more weapons and military aid, while neglecting the situation in Ukraine. This allowed Russia to gain more influence and control over the region.

Benjamin Netanyahu looked at the advantages of retaliation against Palestine to benefit himself so that he could distract attention away from his problems in Israel by launching an all-out assault against innocent citizens in Gaza. Now he won't stop because he knows if does there will be consequences for his war crimes against humanity.

He has ignored efforts for a ceasefire including protests against the war in Tel-Aviv, Global pro-Palestinian rallies with crowds numbering hundreds of thousands, numerous UN Resolutions outlawing the war, and now his latest proclamation that he will ignore any verdict of the international court in the Hague.

As a consequence, Russia, China and Turkiye have now formed an alliance that some have proposed would attack Israel if Netanyahu’s war did not cease immediately.

Russia and Iran have a long history of cooperation and rivalry, dating back to the 16th century. In the contemporary context, both countries share some common interests and challenges, such as countering US influence, supporting the Assad regime in Syria, and maintaining stability in the region. However, they also have divergent goals and agendas, such as competing for energy markets, balancing relations with other regional actors, and pursuing different visions of regional order. However, Russia has engaged in a pragmatic and strategic partnership with Iran that is based on mutual benefits and limited trust.

China has historical ties with Palestine and supports its right to an independent state with East Jerusalem as its capital. China also maintains diplomatic and economic relations with Israel, which is one of its partners in the Belt and Road Initiative. China has criticized the U.S. role in the region and accused it of double standards and interventionism. China has also tried to showcase its diplomatic leadership by hosting a conference of Arab and Muslim ministers in Beijing to seek a peaceful resolution of the Gaza war.

However, China's influence in the Middle East is limited by several factors. China has a policy of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, which sometimes clashes with its ambition to be a global power. China also has to balance between regional rivals, such as Iran and Saudi Arabia, which have different interests and agendas in the Middle East. China does not have a strong military presence in the region, unlike the U.S. and Russia, which limits its ability to project power and protect its interests. China also faces domestic challenges, such as the Uyghur issue, which could affect its relations with some Muslim countries.

Turkiye's stance on the Gaza war is one of strong support for the Palestinians, especially Hamas, and condemnation of Israel's actions. Turkiye has a long history of close ties with Israel, but under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, relations have been strained by ideological differences and clashes over the Palestinian issue. Turkiye considers Hamas a legitimate political actor and has hosted its representatives in Ankara. Turkiye has also provided humanitarian aid to Gaza and denounced Israel's blockade and military operations as genocide. Turkiye's position reflects Erdoğan's vision of regional leadership and his appeal to his domestic support base, which is sympathetic to the Palestinian cause.

I wrote this comment with the hope of expressing my views without offending or provoking Israel or its people. I seek peace and harmony with the fulfillment of the covenant of Daniel Chapter 9 Verse 27. I respect the beliefs and traditions of Israel and I do not wish to impose my own interpretation of the scriptures.

Blessings

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c

The relationship between Israel and the Bible is a complex topic. While it is true that the Old Testament contains many references to Israel, it is not accurate to say that those who support Israel rely solely on the Old Testament. In fact, the New Testament also contains many references to Israel and the Jewish people. For example, Jesus himself was alleged to be a Jew by some and many of his followers were Jewish. The apostle Paul, who wrote many of the books in the New Testament, was also a Jew.

It is important to note that the relationship between Israel and the Bible is a matter of interpretation, and there are many different views on this topic. Some people believe that the Bible teaches that Israel has a special place in God’s plan, while others believe that the Bible does not support this view. Ultimately, the best way to understand the relationship between Israel and the Bible is to study the scriptures for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

Here are some Bible verses that refer to Israel:

• Genesis 12:3 - “I will bless those who bless you, and whoever curses you I will curse; and all peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”

• Isaiah 49:7 - “This is what the Lord says—the Redeemer and Holy One of Israel—to him who was despised and abhorred by the nation, to the servant of rulers: ‘Kings will see you and stand up, princes will see and bow down, because of the Lord, who is faithful, the Holy One of Israel, who has chosen you.’”

• Genesis 15:13 - “Then the Lord said to him, ‘Know for certain that for four hundred years your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own and that they will be enslaved and mistreated there.’”

• Psalm 25:22 - “Redeem Israel, O God, from all their troubles!”

These verses are from the Old Testament and are relevant to Israel’s history but not to their significance today. However, it is important to note that the interpretation of these verses is a matter of debate among scholars and theologians.

Here are some Bible verses from the New Testament that support Israel:

• Romans 11:1-2: “I ask, then, has God rejected his own people, the nation of Israel? Of course not! I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham and a member of the tribe of Benjamin. No, God has not rejected his own people, whom he chose from the very beginning.”

• Romans 11:25-26: “I want you to understand this mystery, dear brothers and sisters, so that you will not feel proud about yourselves. Some of the people of Israel have hard hearts, but this will last only until the full number of Gentiles comes to Christ. And so all Israel will be saved. As the Scriptures say, ‘The one who rescues will come from Jerusalem, and he will turn Israel away from ungodliness.’”

• Romans 15:27: “They were pleased to do it, and indeed they owe it to them. For if the Gentiles have shared in the Jews’ spiritual blessings, they owe it to the Jews to share with them their material blessings.”

• Galatians 6:16: “Peace and mercy to all who follow this rule—to the Israel of God.”

The Bible contains many prophecies about the future of Israel and its role in God’s plan. One of the most significant passages is Romans 11:25-26, which declares that “all Israel will be saved” and that God will “take away their sins”. This implies that Israel will experience a national repentance and restoration when Christ returns. Moreover, Romans 11:1-2 assures us that God has not forsaken his chosen people, Israel.

Another important reference is Galatians 6:16, where Paul speaks of “the Israel of God”. Some interpreters understand this phrase to mean the church, which consists of both Jews and Gentiles who believe in Christ. However, others argue that Paul is referring to a distinct group of Jewish believers within the church, who are still part of the natural Israel.

Furthermore, the website Bible.org offers a comprehensive study of the biblical doctrine of the restoration of Israel, based on Romans 11:26 3. The article argues that the verse indicates that Israel’s current state of hardness and unbelief will end when the fullness of the Gentiles comes to pass.. Clearly that has not happened yet. Then, God will fulfill his promises to Israel and bring salvation to the whole nation AFTER CHRIST RETURNS. Until that happens Israel is a land of hedonistic, mongol dogs, baying at their own, and every other nations arses.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=1s

Monster

 

Monsters among men is a phrase that refers to the worst examples of human cruelty and evil. It is often used to describe people who commit atrocities, such as genocide, torture, rape, murder, or terrorism. Some examples of monsters among men are Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Osama bin Laden, Ted Bundy and now Benjamin Netanyahu. These people have caused immense suffering and death to millions of innocent victims, and have shown no remorse or empathy for their actions. They are considered to be beyond redemption and unworthy of any sympathy or respect.

Monsters among men are not born but made. They are the product of various factors, such as psychological disorders, traumatic experiences, ideological indoctrination, social influences, or personal ambitions. They may also have some genetic or biological predispositions that make them more prone to violence or aggression. However, these factors do not justify or excuse their behaviour, as they still can choose between right and wrong. They are ultimately responsible for their actions and the consequences they bring.

Monsters among men pose a serious threat to the security and well-being of humanity. They often have followers or supporters who share their twisted views or benefit from their crimes. They may also have access to weapons of mass destruction or other means of causing harm on a large scale. They must be stopped by any means necessary before they inflict more damage or inspire others to follow their example. They must be brought to justice and held accountable for their crimes, either by legal systems or by moral forces. They must be exposed and condemned by public opinion and the media, and their legacy must be erased from history. The Jews who occupy Israel are a prime example of this kind of scenario, monsters they are.

I am not referring here to the average run-of-the-mill Jew but to the unholy trinity of the Israeli war cabinet. The Israeli war cabinet was established on October 11, 2023, which was five days after the start of the 2023 Israel-Hamas war. The war cabinet is comprised of Benjamin Netanyahu as the prime minister, Yoav Gallant as the defence minister, and Benny Gantz, former Chief of the General Staff. There are two observers, namely Gadi Eizenkot and Ron Dermer. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Palestinian militant groups, led by Hamas, is known as the 2023 Israel-Hamas war.

At this stage, there does not appear to be any way of stopping these brutes from their ongoing cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people as they wage an all-out -apartheid war of attrition against every living person in Gaza.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gY11mVLeqsg

You have stated the birth mother of Christ was Jewish which would determine Christ as Jewish according to the custom of the mother of a Jew having to be Jewish. `

According to your statement, the biological mother of Jesus was a Jewish woman, which implies that Jesus was also Jewish by the tradition that the mother's identity determines the child's Jewish status. This is a common argument used by some Christian groups to claim a connection between Christianity and Judaism, but it is not universally accepted by all Jewish or Christian authorities. There are many factors that influence the religious identity of a person, such as their beliefs, practices, community, and historical context. Therefore, it is not accurate or respectful to simply assume that Jesus was Jewish based on his maternal lineage alone. The Bible does not give a direct answer to this question, but it provides some clues that can help us infer her ethnic and religious identity.

First, we need to understand that the term "Jewish" can have different meanings depending on the context. It can refer to a person's ancestry, culture, religion, or nationality. In the time of Jesus, there were different groups of Jews who had different beliefs and practices, such as the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Essenes, and the Zealots.

Second, we need to examine the biblical evidence that relates to Mary's background. The most obvious clue is that she was a descendant of King David, as shown in the genealogies of Matthew 1 and Luke 3. This means that she belonged to the tribe of Judah, one of the twelve tribes of Israel. She was also a relative of Elizabeth, who was a descendant of Aaron, the first high priest of Israel (Luke 1:5, 36). This implies that she had a priestly lineage as well.

Third, we need to consider the cultural and religious environment that Mary lived in. She was born and raised in Nazareth, a small town in Galilee, which was a region that had a mixed population of Jews and Gentiles. However, she was betrothed to Joseph, who was also a descendant of David and a devout follower of the law of Moses (Matthew 1:19-20). She also visited the temple in Jerusalem with Joseph and Jesus when he was twelve years old (Luke 2:41-52). She also participated in the Jewish festivals and rituals, such as the Passover (John 2:13), the Feast of Tabernacles (John 7:2), and the purification rites after childbirth (Luke 2:22-24). She also expressed her faith in God and his promises to Israel in her song of praise, known as the Magnificat (Luke 1:46-55).

Based on these clues, we can conclude that Mary was Jewish in terms of her ancestry, culture, and religion. She was part of God's chosen people who were waiting for the Messiah to come and fulfill his covenant with them. She was also privileged to be the mother of Jesus, who was not only the Son of David, but also the Son of God and the Savior of the world.

A possible objection to this view is that it relies on a situational analysis rather than a direct reading of the biblical text. The argument assumes that the context and the circumstances of the original audience are more important than the literal meaning of the words. This may lead to a distortion or a misapplication of the scriptural message, especially if the situation changes over time. A more faithful approach would be to examine what the bible actually says, without imposing any external or subjective factors on the interpretation. The Bible does not state Christ's Jewish identity, which is determined by the mother's Jewishness.

According to the Gospel of Matthew, Joseph, Mary, and Jesus fled to Egypt to avoid Herod's order to kill all children under two years old. After some time, an angel told Joseph in a dream not to go back to Judea because the new ruler, Archelaus, was Herod's son. Instead, they traveled north to Nazareth in Galilee, where Jesus grew up. Matthew says that this was to fulfill what prophets had foretold, that "He shall be called a Nazarene". However, this hypothesis is not universally accepted, especially by Messianic Jews. The term Nazarene is derived from the name of the city of Nazareth, where Jesus was raised. It is possible that the term Nazarene also refers to those who strongly adhered to, and defended the Mosaic Law but does not mean Christ adhered to these laws. It is important to note that these are based on religious beliefs and interpretations that may not be shared by everyone. Lastly, it is important to clarify that Christ was not a Jew and neither does the Bible identify Christ as a Jew.

The Mosaic Law is a set of religious and moral codes that God revealed to Moses on Mount Sinai, according to the Hebrew Bible. The Mosaic Law consists of the Torah, or the first five books of the Hebrew Bible, which contain various laws and commandments for the Israelite's to follow. The Mosaic Law can be divided into three categories: moral, ceremonial, and civil. The moral laws include the Ten Commandments, which are universal principles of righteousness and justice. The ceremonial laws include the regulations for worship, sacrifices, festivals, and rituals. Civil laws include the rules for social and political life, such as property rights, inheritance, marriage, and crime. The Mosaic Law was given to Israel as a covenant between God and his chosen people. It was designed to show them God's holiness, their sinfulness, and their need for a Savior. The Mosaic Law also foreshadowed the coming of Jesus Christ, who fulfilled the law by his perfect obedience and sacrifice. Christians are no longer under the Mosaic Law as a rule of life, as that only applies to the Israelite Jews of the Old Testament, but they can learn from its wisdom and apply its moral principles to their lives.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=295s 

You are mistaken, Jews did not write all of the Bible and I will explain why. The authorship of the Bible is a topic that has been widely debated and discussed by scholars and religious leaders. Although the exact origins of the Bible remain shrouded in mystery, it is generally accepted that the Bible was written by many different authors over centuries. The Old Testament, also known as the Hebrew Bible, provides a historical account of the people of Israel over around a thousand years. It begins with God's creation of the world and humankind and contains various stories, laws, and moral teachings that form the basis of religious life for both Jews and Christians.

For a long time, Jewish and Christian traditions held that a single author wrote the first five books of the Bible, known as the Torah and Pentateuch. These books are Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy. Moses, the Hebrew prophet who led the Israelites out of captivity in Egypt and guided them towards the Promised Land, was believed to be that single author. However, after years of study and research, scholars still have many questions about the Bible's origins and authorship. While various theories have been proposed about who wrote the Bible, there is still no definitive answer.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c&t=295s 

Hezbollah is a political and military organization of resistance fighters based in Lebanon that participating in the conflict between Israel and Palestine. The resistance has a strong military branch and is known for its use of unconventional methods such as suicide attacks, killings, and abductions of foreign soldiers, but not with the same ferocity as Israel. That said, What other option do the Hezbollah resistance fighters have in their defense of Palestine other than to fire a few puny rockets over Israel that are usually intercepted anyway by the Israeli Iron Dome defense system?

It is not inappropriate to talk about or support violent actions that could harm people or groups of people in the manner of Israel. However, it is important to encourage peaceful dialogue and non-violent solutions to conflicts but that is not something the Israelis wish to engage in and never have.

I suggest we talk about ways to foster peace and understanding between different groups of people and not take the one-sided stance you have displayed here. This is a constructive and respectful way to express your disagreement with someone's opinion or perspective. You are not attacking or dismissing their views, but inviting them to engage in a dialogue that can broaden both of your horizons. You are also acknowledging that there are multiple sides to any issue and that you are willing to listen and learn from others. By suggesting to talk about ways to foster peace and understanding, you are showing that you care about the common good and the well-being of all people, regardless of their differences. You are also implying that you have some ideas or suggestions on how to achieve this goal, which can spark a productive and meaningful conversation. You fail to do this.

Blessings

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MQPhOdIk02c

This is a monster, not a man

Displaying anger at the beginning of this presentation violates the norms of professional communication and conduct and could damage your relationships, reputation and trust. I will not reciprocate with a similar form of emotion. Calm down.

Indeed, you are not a prophet who can foresee the future with divine inspiration. Instead, you are a futurist who analyses present trends and patterns and extrapolates them to possible future scenarios using scientific methods, data and evidence. Your predictions are not based on faith, intuition or the Bible. You understand the complexity and uncertainty of the future and do not make absolute or dogmatic predictions. Instead, you offer multiple perspectives and possibilities. Your goal is to inform, inspire and challenge your audience. However, you aim to manipulate, deceive or coerce your audience into believing a one-sided perspective that portrays Israel as faultless in the current conflict. The whole world knows of the war crimes they have committed in Gaza. Sugarcoating anything will not change facts.

Palestinians have not been trying to wipe out Israel. A statement such as that is fictitious. What you are engaged in here is a negative stereotype about every Arab nation in the Middle East and Israel by putting all of them into one boat by falsely stating they are all out to get Israel as if to excuse their current brutality.

Some analysts argue that the main source of hostility towards Israel in the Middle East is not the Palestinian issue, but rather the Iranian regime. They claim that Iran has been pursuing a radical agenda of spreading its influence and ideology across the region, and that it views Israel as a major obstacle to its ambitions. They point out that Iran has supported various militant groups that oppose Israel, such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Islamic Jihad, and that it has repeatedly threatened to wipe Israel off the map. They also cite Iran's nuclear program as a serious threat to Israel's security and existence. Therefore, they suggest that resolving the conflict with Iran is a more urgent and effective way of achieving peace and stability in the region than focusing on the Palestinian question.

The relationship between Iran and Israel has been tumultuous for many decades. The history of their relations can be divided into four main phases: the period of uncertainty from 1947 to 1953, a friendly period during the reign of the Pahlavi dynasty from 1953 to 1979, a worsening period post the Iranian Revolution between 1979 to 1990, and an ongoing period of open hostility since the Gulf War ended in 1991. In recent news, Iran has been accused of sponsoring and supporting the Palestinian resistance fighters in their recent attack on Israel on October 07th. Additionally, the UK Defence Secretary, Grant Shapps, has warned Iran to stop encouraging the Houthis to intervene in the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza. It is important to note that the conflict between Iran and Israel is a complex issue with a long history, and it is not possible to provide a comprehensive overview in a single response.

I fully support Iran if they can finally bring peace to the Middle East when all attempts to broker peace with Israel by the United Nations passing one resolution after another have failed to achieve anything.

However, I do not advocate violence in the Middle East, nor do I support any parties or factions that resort to it. I believe that the only way to achieve lasting peace and stability in the region is through dialogue, cooperation and respect for human rights and international law. Violence only breeds more violence, and creates a cycle of hatred and revenge that harms innocent civilians and undermines the prospects of a peaceful resolution. I urge all sides to renounce violence and to engage in constructive negotiations that address the root causes of the conflict and the legitimate aspirations of all people. I also call on the international community to play a positive and impartial role in facilitating such a process and providing humanitarian assistance to those in need.

Blessings

https://www.cuttingedge.org/newsletters/index.html

God Thundered from His Throne: "But whosoever shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea."

There is nothing I could agree with more. But oh Israel, how many innocent children have you killed in Gaza and all in the false name of revenge, thousands, and how severe will your punishment be? I would not be in your shoes for all the money in the world.

The kind of Hypocrisy the Cutting Edge Ministries displays is the act of pretending to have beliefs, opinions, virtues, feelings, qualities, or standards that one does not actually have. Hypocrisy is thus a kind of lie. Hypocrisy can also refer to the practice of engaging in the same behavior or activity for which one criticises another person. For example, a person who claims to be an environmentalist but drives a gas-guzzling car is a hypocrite. Hypocrisy can have negative effects on individuals and society, such as eroding trust, undermining moral values, and creating cynicism and resentment. 

In this instance pretending to have compassion for innocent children victimized by Pedophiles while at the same time edifying Israel for butchering thousands of children in Gaza is the height of intolerance.

You refuse to listen to or respect the views and beliefs of others, even when they do not agree with them. Intolerance is a form of discrimination that can lead to violence, oppression, and injustice. Intolerance can be based on religion, ethnicity, race, gender, sexuality, or any other aspect of human diversity. Intolerance is harmful to individuals and societies, as it erodes trust, cooperation, and peace. Intolerance is also contrary to the values of democracy, human rights, and pluralism. To overcome intolerance, we need to foster a culture of dialogue, understanding, and mutual respect among people of different backgrounds and perspectives. We need to challenge stereotypes, prejudices, and hate speech that fuel intolerance. We need to promote education, awareness, and empathy that celebrate diversity and inclusion. We need to stand up for the rights and dignity of all people, regardless of their differences. Intolerance has no place in a civilized world. Surely you are not Christians but wolves in sheep’s clothing.

Wolves in sheep's clothing such as Cutting Edge Ministries are people who pretend to be good or trustworthy, but are actually malicious or deceitful. They use their disguise to manipulate, exploit, or harm others, often for their own benefit. Wolves in sheep's clothing can be found in many contexts, such as politics, business, religion, or personal relationships. They may appear to be friendly, helpful, or sincere, but their true intentions are hidden behind a mask of lies. Wolves in sheep's clothing can cause a lot of damage to the people they target, such as ruining their reputation, stealing their money, or breaking their hearts. Therefore, it is important to be careful and vigilant when dealing with strangers or acquaintances who seem too good to be true. One should always verify the facts, ask for references, and trust their intuition before trusting someone who claims to be a friend or an ally. Wolves in sheep's clothing are dangerous and cunning predators who prey on the innocent and the naive. They should be exposed and avoided at all costs.

Blessings